Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: 2011 In Extreme Home Runs

Knicks 111, Nets 105

(AP Photo/Bill Kostroun)

Well I didn't expect that. I predicted a loss tonight, and all early signs pointed in that direction. The Knicks quickly fell behind by double digits, but rallied and hang on to beat the Nets in what became a hard-fought, entertaining game. Notes:

  • Wilson Chandler's cool, but I really wish Chong Williams slipped to the Knicks. His shot-blocking could do wonders for this team.
  • I've often commented on Isiah's tendency to stare blankly into space while he's being questioned by the media. Funny thing is Stephon Marbury is exactly the same way. It's about as creepy and unsettling as an interview can be.
  • Tell me if this makes sense. Last night, Kenny Smith said Chris Paul wasn't one of the 10 fastest point guards in the league. Kinda bogus, but he backed it up by saying that he meant raw speed, not quickness with the ball. Whatever. But then tonight, he says that Jason Kidd is one of the three fastest people in the league. Come on. If Chris Paul raced Jason Kidd with a ball, without a ball, blindfolded, naked, on stilts, skis, or a bobsled, he would torch him. No contest.
  • Mike Breen made a good point: Between Kidd and Darrell Armstrong, the Nets have 74 years of point guard.
  • As the announcers noted, this game was noteworthy in that the Knicks fell pretty far behind pretty early and didn't quit for once. Sure, it took a spark from the second unit, but the defense stepped up and the ball moved more to close the gap by halftime. Impressive. And since we're giving other teams the benefit of the doubt for facing the Knicks at the end of tough stretches, let's give the Knicks credit for staging a gritty comeback in their third game in 4 nights.
  • Some clown named Jonathan Coachman was filling in for Al Trautwig as the pre-game and halftime guy. He was generally fine, except for boldly cutting off a whiny Knick-rant from Chris Rock.
  • Randolph and Curry hooked up a few times. Zach's not a good passer by any stretch of the imagination, but can throw a decent lob over the top to the big fella.
  • Speaking of Randolph, Isiah ran a zone a few times that had Zach out on the perimeter and a guard down low banging with Jamaal Magloire. Unorthodox, but it worked alright.
  • Crawford had the move of the night with a behind-the-back move to an and-one layup in Jason Kidd's face.
  • For a rookie ref, John Gobel's got some sack. He's the guy who tossed Allen Iverson last night, and tonight he called the game tight, including a particularly egregious traveling call on Vince Carter (which was, indeed, a travel, but that's besides the point). Guy needs to learn a thing or two about star treatment!
  • There was a little beefing in this one. Q put an intentional foul on Richard Jefferson, who kinda popped him with a 'bow on his way to the line. Q took offense and started yapping, and Jamaal Magloire responded with a two-handed push. Words were said, glares were glared, technicals were distributed, but nothing came of it. There was a point at which it looked like Nate was gonna take on (and probably take down) Magloire, but it was nipped in the bud. Probably better that way, but damn.
  • Zach Randolph is very good at rebounding with one hand. Just saying.
  • One moment in this game totally embodied the personality of Renaldo Balkman. In the fourth quarter, Fred Jones was called for a pretty questionable blocking foul. Jones was irate, Isiah was baffled, the Knick bench was concerned, and Balkman was sitting and laughing like an idiot. That's Humpty in a nutshell.
A Few Individual Performances of Note
  • Jamal Crawford was lights-out once again. He finished with 35 points on 11-20 shooting (including 6 threes), as well as 8 assists. More importantly, he hit a number of big shots down the stretch, including the dagger three that ultimately put the game out of reach.
  • Curry and Randolph both enjoyed modest success. Randolph had 24 and 11, and Curry had 17 and 5. Both managed to hold their own (after the first quarter anyway) on defense as well. That's all we ask.
  • Nate Robinson didn't shoot all that well (4-14) but looked great running the point, and made himself a real pest on defense.
In general, this game wasn't as pretty as the Wiz and Pistons blowouts, but was equally surprising in the resiliency the Knicks showed. It was one of the few times the Knicks made up for a shitty start, and they did so by getting to and connecting from the line, limiting turnovers, taking the right shots, and playing some D. Very refreshing. Thanks to all of you for participating in the game thread. Great turnout. Backatcha tomorrow. Peace.

Comment 6 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I only got to listen to the game last night
as my league pass was blacked out for some reason... and after the first quarter i gave up....

But im gonna watch it on replay because this could be the high point of the season...  and i wanna rub it in my bitch-ass Nets-fan mates face!!!!

pmac

by pmac on Jan 17, 2008 6:05 AM EST reply actions  

i heard a rumor that
the knicks had won three straight.  i came here to confirm it.

like ive said before, all this losing would be out the window if we could just play the nets every game.

it makes me feel good that we finally decided to start beating on our little brothers from down the road again.

Ewing with the step...YES! and the foul!

by Anthony Masons Haircut on Jan 17, 2008 9:04 AM EST reply actions  

IF..
They consistently shot free throws like they did last night they could beat anybody...oh and whats this talk that knicks are beating only tired teams? Please a pro team is supposed to be able to compete everynight anywayz...3 dubs in 4 nights bitches!

by mightykingcrayon on Jan 17, 2008 10:33 AM EST reply actions  

This winning streak
is the worst possible thing that could have happened to the Knicks. Just when it looked like Dolan was going to wise up and dump Isiah, this happens.

-- Ed
Big Blue View

by ETVal @ Posting and Toasting on Jan 17, 2008 10:58 AM EST up reply actions  

trades??
One proposed deal would have sent Crawford and a cap filler (Malik Rose and/or Jerome James) to the New Jersey Nets for Vince Carter. Another would have sent Crawford and others to the Cleveland Cavaliers for a package built around Larry Hughes. A third deal, which was squashed by the Bucks, would have sent Zach Randolph to Milwaukee.
--ESPN.com

every1s talkin about how isiahs turning down fair trades...those trades dont look very fair to me tho wut do u guys think??the z-bo to the bucks was supposedly for charlie v gadzuric and bobby simmons i think??thas ass..i woodnt do n e 1 of those trades

cop them dubs baby...you kno im burnin dubs

by bucketz3 on Jan 17, 2008 2:34 PM EST reply actions  

i completely agree
not one of those would make me happy.
Posting and Toasting: Unabashed Knicks fanaticism with the occasional poop joke.

by Seth on Jan 17, 2008 3:32 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Posting and Toasting: Blogging the Knicks Robin Hood-Style Since 2007

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Why Clyde Frazier is Banned in China
Bernard-king-new-york-knicks-crown-garden-autographed-photograph-3364338_small
Knicks Reels Weekly Issue #6 - Better Lin Than Never!
8_small
The Legend of Jeremy Lin
Jorts6_small
Mann-Mann
Untitled_small
My Solution - Everybody Wins! :)

Recent FanPosts

Small
Lin for MVP
Small
Would you trade Jeremy Lin for John Wall?
Small
Some live game notes from MSG South
Small
What next? So exciting... and so scary...
Jorts6_small
Why The Knicks Shouldn't Sign J.R. Smith
Small
steve novak is the key coming off the bench;;
Sterling_archer_small
Jeremy Lin's Future: Backup or PG of the Future
Jorts6_small
Feelin' Lucky

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >