The Battle for the 3 Spot
Knickerblogger's got a great post up today regarding the starting small forward position. Mike statistically demonstrates that Wilson Chandler has been soundly outplaying Quentin Richardson in preseason action. Not that you need the stats if you've been watching Q sling threes all over the rim in the past three games. Now, three exhibition games don't tell the full story, but Wilson's recent play and Mike D'Antoni's preferred style lead me to agree that Chandler should and very well may start this season. I'm still not totally sold on his shooting improvement. Those threes he hit on Tuesday just didn't look like they should've been going in. If that shot is coming along, though, it's no contest. Wil's athletic as hell, can play some D, and tirelessly chases rebounds on both ends of the floor. I think Chandler's also got a better shot at guarding multiple positions. In different lineups, he's got the mix of size and agility to match up with shooting guards and rangy power forwards alike. I don't know if you can say that about Q, who's a gritty defender but a bit land-locked at this point.
That said, it's worth mentioning that Richardson has some plusses of his own. Q's by far the more vocal of the two. On a squad with an iffy point guard situation, that's not to be forgotten. He's got (ostensibly) a smoother shooting stroke and has proven that he can cause problems for the league's superstars. Q also has a history with Mike D'Antoni, for whatever that's worth.
In summary, Wilson Chandler is faster, more athletic, more versatile, and more down with the Jews than Quentin Richardson, and therefore gets my starting nod.
So that's my terribly biased opinion on the situation. What do you think?
0 recs |
4
comments
Read Related
Comments
real talk
if wilson fucks wit the jews, i fucks hardbody wit wilson!
by stingy d on Oct 16, 2008 4:45 PM EDT 0 recs
gallinari?
obviously he’s injured, but, isn’t he like our 3 of the future?
by Barnesgasm on Oct 16, 2008 5:47 PM EDT 0 recs
Yeah.
I mean now. I don’t think Gallinari will be starting in two weeks.
Posting and Toasting: Yes sir!
by Seth on
Oct 16, 2008 9:37 PM EDT
up
0 recs
even though
I voted for chandler… who starts the game is basically irrelevant. What will be important is who is finishing the games.
If Q is going to be one of the leaders of this team, he deserves to start. WC will get the spot soon enough… no need to rush him.
Q isnt going to be a great 3 shooter or a lock-down defender anymore (although, he is still an above average defender imo), so what he will best give this young team is leadership. Especially with a new and very different system, that he is comfortable in. That leadership dynamic will be greatly depreciated if he comes off the bench.
by gbaked99 on Oct 17, 2008 10:43 AM EDT 0 recs











