Count on Nash in 2010, not Lebron Knick fans
I think Nash would be a great compliment to a Bosh or Amare (again), if we cant get LeBron.
7 months ago
cec21
6 comments
0 recs |
Email
PrintComments
in 2010
Steve Nash will be 36. Just saying.
Posting and Toasting: Yes sir!
by Seth on
Nov 26, 2008 2:53 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
You don't lose
your shooting or passing when you’re 36, though. Just your defense. Pair him with a well defending shooting guard and let him throw ridiculous passes to people in different time zones. Silly ass Canadians!
"I'll probably go get lifted right now with Greg. Hey, and come back tomorrow and try to get another win."
-Renaldo
by solanumbrella on
Nov 26, 2008 7:17 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You lose speed
It also becomes harder to recover from injuries
The Knicks are in trouble because they overspent for aging players -
by NYERinSF on
Nov 30, 2008 12:17 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
JJ
nash would be OK but i think id rather have Joe Johnson or D-Wade than Nas at 36
you lose a lot more than D at age 36 how will he create his own shot or shots for someone else, he’ll have 0 athleticism
you want a PG who can do some sick passes but not much else than TANK and draft Rubio at least he’s young.
BTW i actually do thik nash is a good idea if he is teamed with some good playerS and as maybe a third or fouth option
by gdizzle320 on
Nov 26, 2008 7:37 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Nash is plan F
as far as i’m concerned.
i still don’t see them striking out on Lebron.
Ewing with the step...YES! and the foul!
by Anthony Masons Haircut on
Nov 26, 2008 8:05 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
I think Nash with 36 year´s is not the best solution….it is sure that it can be other good options.
by Mirk on
Dec 6, 2008 12:26 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
New FanPost
Certain photos copyright © 2009 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
