What of David Lee?
For whatever reason, Danilo Gallinari's arrival in New York has pushed David Lee into the spotlight, with many media convinced that there's room for only one hunky white teenybopper sensation in New York. Lee might very well relinquish that title to a man whose youth, foreign accent, and schoolboy charm give him a decided advantage.
What, then, of Lee? Talk of Lee's departure draws from his contract, which has includes an option next year, as well as rumors of Mike D'Antoni's belief that the blue collar power forward won't fit his offense. Surely, some other city is in need of this big man's tenacious rebounding, budding offensive game, and affinity for the lotions. The discussion is raging at Knickerblogger over this rumor, floated by Frank Isola, of a deal involving Lee and Charlotte's Raymond Felton. There's also talk of picking up one of Memphis's excess point guards. This is pure rumor, but if the Knicks are really looking to deal Lee, what about looking to the future? If the goal is really to get under the cap, possibly to lure LeBron James or some other big name, why not stockpile some picks and address needs through upcoming drafts, all while getting younger and limiting money spent? New York could use a pure point guard and some low-post defense, and guys like Brandon Jennings, Ricky Rubio, and Hasheem Thabeet are expected in the draft in the next year or two. This probably contradicts things I said before the draft, but Walsh decided to pick a 19 year-old Italian who's considered more of a project than a "win now" type guy. He could follow through by trading Lee, if he is indeed to be traded, for picks and/or expiring contracts, while letting Marbury's deal expire and allowing guys like Robinson, Crawford, and Gallinari spin a little in D'Antoni's system. Then raid the draft and get back to work. Another losing season would suck, but it's pretty much bound to happen anyway, and these things take time.
All that said, I can understand the desire to get competitive quickly and, as solanumbrella says, that a guy like Felton might work in the long run. I just think that the Gallinari pick is a sure rebuilding move, and one long-term move begets another. If we're really ready to let New York's reigning shirtless white sensation go, leaving in his wake scores of heartbroken lotion-wielding females, then I'd like to get some hope in return. I'm interested to hear your thoughts in the comments.
0 recs |
11
comments
Read Related
Comments
DLee
Larry Bird could use another white guy. Want Tinsley? Come on…
by Both Teams Played Hard on Jun 28, 2008 4:41 PM EDT 0 recs
Felton is ok
and his rookie deal expires after this season, but i’m not completely thrilled with parting with Lee for him.
as for Tinsley, there’s no reason for any team to try to trade for him. Bird and everyone else in Indy knows that he won’t be wearing a Pacer uniform next season. unless they take on a bad contract in a trade, they’re going to have to end up eating Tinsley’s contract and cutting him loose.
Ewing with the step...YES! and the foul!
by Anthony Masons Haircut on Jun 28, 2008 6:36 PM EDT 0 recs
I agree with everything you said...
Particularly the part about how we won’t win next year anyway, so let’s keep with the rebuilding plan. I still think the LeBron thing is silly – he’s going to Brooklyn, not NY. And I think calling Danilo “a project, not a win-now” player is a bit off… no rookie is really a win-now player. Danilo, however, is more win-now than any other rookie; he led his team to a championship in Europe last year, and was the MVP (or Rising Star, or whatever his award was). I think Europe League is more competitive than the NCAA in a lot of respects. When this kid was 16, he was playing with men, grown men, while his American counterparts were playing with high school boys half their size.
Danilo’s game may not be NBA-dominant, maybe not ever (we’ll find out soon enough), but he’s as ready to do whatever he’s going to do now, as any rookie, than any other player selected in this year’s draft.
by stopmikelupica on Jun 29, 2008 1:32 AM EDT 0 recs
Good point.
Not many rookies have played pro ball already.
Posting and Toasting: Unabashed Knicks fanaticism with the occasional poop joke.
by Seth on
Jun 29, 2008 10:49 AM EDT
up
0 recs
"scores of heartbroken lotion-wielding females"
classic stuff. leads me to believe seth must be a creative writing major—am i right?
by SamH on Jun 29, 2008 2:01 PM EDT 0 recs
Psych and/or neuroscience
...but much appreciated!
Posting and Toasting: Unabashed Knicks fanaticism with the occasional poop joke.
by Seth on
Jun 30, 2008 12:33 AM EDT
up
0 recs
agreed with SML
Gallinari is as NBA ready as anyone except maybe Michael Beasley. He’ll play 20-25 minutes next year.
And while my first reaction during the draft was that Lee was a goner, perhaps it’s just us freaking out. Walsh is smart enough to know that Lee is by far his biggest asset and that considering how few he has, he needs to wait for the right deal. As far as I’m concerned, there’s not much to the Felton rumors, so I think we should breathe easy on him.
by riise on Jun 29, 2008 6:27 PM EDT 0 recs
draft pick
dont we have to give Utah our pick next year?
by gbaked99 on Jun 30, 2008 11:44 AM EDT 0 recs
Draft Pick
Why don’t we trade Lee to a team that is projected to be in the lottery, then in case we do make the playoffs somehow we have a lottery pick, and if we don’t we have two lottery picks. But then again is D. Lee really worth a first round draft pick?
You all did love him once. - The New York Knicks.
http://vramb.blogspot.com/
by THEWILLY on Jun 30, 2008 2:19 PM EDT 0 recs
2009 draft pick
its a protected pick, so its ours if its in the top 20 …in which case it becomes an unprotected 2010 pick to Utah
by bkcowboy on Jun 30, 2008 3:42 PM EDT 0 recs
Ron Artest
Lakers are After Ron Artest Last Chance for the Knicks to get Him.
by Beer_man on Jul 11, 2008 2:23 AM EDT 0 recs










