Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

Knicks After Allen Iverson?

The rumors were bound to come. From Frank Isola at the Daily News:

Donnie Walsh will spend the next 48 hours debating what impact, both negative and positive, Iverson could have on the organization. Walsh, the Knicks' president, confirmed last night that the club will explore the possibility of signing Iverson, the former league MVP who was placed on waivers Tuesday by the Memphis Grizzlies.

"We'll look into it," Walsh told the Daily News. "Right now, I'd say probably not but we'll see."

I see the logic behind this potential move, but my opinion falls in line with a few things Isola mentions in his article. I don't see the point. The idea that we need some sideshow to keep us occupied until July seems childish. Similarly, the notion of signing Iverson to win some games is shaky because 1. Iverson at this point in his career isn't enough to make these Knicks competitive, so why bother? and 2. Paying for wins just to spite Utah (the owners of New York's draft pick) is unnecessary. It's Utah. The big thing, though, is that Iverson would steal minutes from Toney Douglas, which seems backwards, given that Toney's a long-term investment and AI would be a rental.

Long story short, the interest is to be expected, but I don't see it amounting to anything for the reasons mentioned above. Would you guys support an Iverson signing? Share your thoughts (preferably in the form of limerick, if you can manage it) in the comments.

Comment 88 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Ok here goes..

The signing of AI would be silly
Even if just for 2 milli
He’ll fail to adapt
And Knicks’ll be trapped
Trying to unload him to Philly

"But when he saw it, he just put his hands up and they couldn’t give it to him. It just fell to the ground, I-I don’t, you know … So, that showed me he had great experience..." - Jeff Van Gundy

by Anthony Bonner's Subpoena on Nov 16, 2009 10:22 PM EST reply actions  

perhaps we could package him with jeffries
the sixers must love foolish recipes
we’ll get back their draft pick
and skeet down their ass splits
and pray for the love of the referees

twitter.com/aighttho
http://howmuchyouthink.tumblr.com/

by stingy d on Nov 17, 2009 1:53 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

nah.....

"It ain't over till its over"---

by FreeBradshaw on Nov 16, 2009 10:48 PM EST reply actions  

It would be a waste of TD.

by bm01bath on Nov 16, 2009 10:59 PM EST reply actions  

This is about tickets

That’s only reason it’s being discussed. Business transaction.

by DoctorK16 on Nov 16, 2009 11:03 PM EST reply actions  

We’re now entering the danger zone. I’d be very quick to question walsh’s decision making if we actually signed Iverson. Really hope it doesn’t happen. From a media standpoint, it’s only going to be negative. I’m sick of the knicks being a laughingstock in the media, and this would only help continue that trend.

by NYK on Nov 16, 2009 11:18 PM EST reply actions  

idk

if it was just for the rest of the year…

It could be fun. I dont think it would hurt TD’s time as much as it would hurt Duhon and Hughes time.

AI would make the games more fun to watch. A guy that can take the ball down the stretch?

Plus, AI could turn it around in NYC under a coach like MD… I feel like he could do well in this system with TD at the 1 and him at the 2…

I mean. We suck so much, why not?

by gbaked on Nov 16, 2009 11:26 PM EST reply actions  

kind of agree

if he cuts into hughes and duhons minutes, then why not? itll be entertaining. AI and nate? omg, sign me up

by enron4515 on Nov 16, 2009 11:28 PM EST up reply actions  

This isn't worth talking about.

Allen Iverson has been a few different places the past few years.
All of them got better when he left.

I didn’t know everyone missed Zach Randolph this much.

"I'll probably go get lifted right now with Greg. Hey, and come back tomorrow and try to get another win."

-Renaldo

by solanumbrella on Nov 16, 2009 11:42 PM EST reply actions  

This entire season Mike D has been searching for solutions to problems and i personally think its time for the ANSWER!!!

by Pellez0626 on Nov 16, 2009 11:44 PM EST reply actions  

im down for it

the season is abismal… i would have never imagined that we would be 1-9 and breaking records for teh worst start in team history. The ONLY reason why I say getting AI would be fine is b/c in this d’antoni system, he could play with freedom and make the players around him better. Gallo, chandler, harrington.. these players need one things, a ball handler that can create plays for others… although ai isnt known to be pass happy by any means… he is still imo, a better option than du, who is gone from this teams future plans.

by semsemma on Nov 16, 2009 11:49 PM EST reply actions  

td is gonna dwtdd.. ai will pplay the two with hughes off the bench.. and du backing up td and not douglas backing up du!! maybe so.. douglas ai gallo lee darko/curry ..then we can have chandler at the 3,4 as with harrington and j hill

by semsemma on Nov 17, 2009 12:27 AM EST reply actions  

sooo...

limericks aren’t cool anymore guys? no?

"But when he saw it, he just put his hands up and they couldn’t give it to him. It just fell to the ground, I-I don’t, you know … So, that showed me he had great experience..." - Jeff Van Gundy

by Anthony Bonner's Subpoena on Nov 17, 2009 12:27 AM EST reply actions  

i can't not

the “race”, or the iverson derby
is truly confining and dirty
a thirty percent shooter
who nobody boos fer
strikes me as rather disturbing.

twitter.com/aighttho
http://howmuchyouthink.tumblr.com/

by stingy d on Nov 17, 2009 1:29 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Please pass Knicks

Do we need yet another undersized guard? No way. Plus, we all know he HAS to start otherwise he’ll stage yet another mutiny. TD has looked good initially and even Duhon can’t be this bad through an entire season. With high usage NateRob in the wings, AI is just redundant.

As far as it being merely business, will the Knicks really be that much more of a draw? Aren’t they already leading the league in attendence? Also, consider that the youth might have to take a backseat with him around. The whole point of this season is to really see what these guys have so the FO can best decide a course of action for 2010.

Looking for in depth solid basketball analysis? Try www.basketballfreeforall.com!

by RedHopeful on Nov 17, 2009 12:38 AM EST reply actions  

why not sign iverson

when iverson was on the floor actually he looked pretty good and still has a little left.
he may not get a ring but it would be entertaining basketball, at this point the Knicks couldn’t get much worse and may actually win a few more games.

by autoprt on Nov 17, 2009 1:03 AM EST reply actions  

while every lug holds on his pud
and drags a.i.‘s name through the mud
we’re missing the point
we duly annoint
let’s let toney d. do what he dud

twitter.com/aighttho
http://howmuchyouthink.tumblr.com/

by stingy d on Nov 17, 2009 1:34 AM EST via mobile reply actions  

Toney will still get his minutes.
AI’s got unfinished buisness.
Let him start, let him score,
Build up a rapport
Then trade him in Feb for a draft pick.

by beelove on Nov 17, 2009 9:31 AM EST up reply actions  

word

I don’t care what they say, the limerick aint dead.

"But when he saw it, he just put his hands up and they couldn’t give it to him. It just fell to the ground, I-I don’t, you know … So, that showed me he had great experience..." - Jeff Van Gundy

by Anthony Bonner's Subpoena on Nov 17, 2009 10:43 AM EST up reply actions  

yet

if we must have a gunner
no one would be funner
for with each passing dawn
our chances are gone
the answer is truly a wonder.

twitter.com/aighttho
http://howmuchyouthink.tumblr.com/

by stingy d on Nov 17, 2009 1:44 AM EST via mobile reply actions  

WHY

Sorry to say it nicks fan but yall wont get lebron cuz he isnt stupid so your better off getting allen iverson whats the worst that would happen? What yall will loose. Oh my bad yall know all about that.

by lartho6 on Nov 17, 2009 8:39 AM EST reply actions  

hell yeah! (shoulda signed him for 1yr ova the summer)

we will miss out AGAIN if we dont sign him just for the rest of the season. we have done nothing but suck and focus on 2010. we failed in the draft last year (gallo was way too high) and then again this year (hill in top 10?). walsh and mike d got lucky so far with TD but do yall think he’s the pg future for us? maybe he is, but we cant continue this year like this. SIGN AI YESTERDAY! it doesnt hurt us for next year. we need scoring, energy, leadership and AI would give us that for 3/4 of this season.

by Mike Ho on Nov 17, 2009 9:01 AM EST reply actions  

It's a no-brainer: Yes

If he’s got anything left, you build him up and trade him to a contender near the deadline. Get a prospect or a draft pick from a win-now team.

Modern humanist I am, I hate to say flip a person like a house in ‘05 — especially a guy who was my favorite player 10 yrs ago, but it would work out for everyone . . . if he can still play — I haven’t seen him this year.

Knicks have no assets. One mega and one big contract in 2010 won’t give us a team. Piece by piece, people. Iverson might not be a piece, but he might be a trade chip.

by beelove on Nov 17, 2009 9:26 AM EST reply actions  

Given the current state of the Knicks .....

I’d sign Iverson for the rest of the year. Believe me …. I never thought I’d say this. I’ve always been impressed with his talent but, quite honestly, I never thought Iverson was the type of player you’d want to have on a team contending for a championship. I still believe this.

All that said, the Knicks season looks so dismal that I wouldn’t be opposed to bringing him in to add some life to the Garden, perhaps showcase a bit of what D’Antoni’s offense could do and, hopefully, win a few games that they wouldn’t otherwise win. Even with Iverson onboard, I think the Knicks will be hard pressed to even get to the 30-win total. But …. 28 or 29 is better than 22 or 23.

My only caveat is that Iverson would not so dominate things that Douglas and Gallo get marginalized to any significant degree. In my opinion, those two deserve an opportunity to get significant playing time this year and their share of shots, time with the ball, etc.

by Jeff I on Nov 17, 2009 9:37 AM EST reply actions  

my schtick isnt limmerick

I might be on board with Iverson in a Knicks uniform.
I think he is a different player than in the past. Detroit and Memphis really bugged him. Neither team was a good fit and to Iverson’s credit… I never heard anyone applaud either move because it was easy to see his spot was already filled. Detroit had Hamilton established, and Memphis is loaded with young talent; Conley at PG, Mayo at SG.

Iverson has his reputation, but actually, he generally does what he is asked. He is a scorer, sure, but he can be a playmaker if he is asked to play that role. He’s not stupid, and he doesn’t gun as much as his %s show. If people want to stand around and not create their own space, Iverson does it himself. That’s actually what New York needs though. Who on this team is willing to take charge and make things happen? Harrington talked the talk, but he’s far from a playmaker.

I wouldn’t call him such a mentor, but oney Douglas and even Nate Robinson can learn some things from AI. He comes to play every game. Iverson only became a headache when he felt disrespected by coaches. Larry Brown anyone? Michael Curry was a former teammate, and 1st time coach… awkward?! MEMPHIS straight up lied just to sell tickets… they knew damn well they weren’t gonna start him, yet when he made it clear at the start that he was looking for a starting gig, they said “ok”. NY knows better than that.

Iverson knows he could use this season to build his rep back up and also help the Knicks win some games and develop themselves. He would come into NY knowing full well that its not long term, so what does either have to lose?

by Chris Child's Fist on Nov 17, 2009 10:07 AM EST reply actions  

looks like

if the knicks got iverson, they’d couple it with another changing of the guards. I’ve heard either a hughes buyout, or trying to move duhon to a team who needs him as a backup. Sacramento for a draft pick perhaps?? That’s Sherlock-holmes interesting. Whatever happens, i think AI is a tempo player, and defensively conscious, something that the knicks really need. I agree it wont be TD that loses time over this if it goes down.

Also, AI is only volatile when he’s put into awful situations that don’t fit his game. Replacing Hamilton, who detroit loves and won a championship for them? terrible. Coming off the bench for a team looking to develop potential star guards in Memphis? Not smart. TD is the only developing guard in NY, and AI is a shoe-in starter here. Don’t be bashful donnie boy.

by Ray Smuckles on Nov 17, 2009 10:18 AM EST reply actions  

Iverson for only a year? Where do I sign up??

For people making the comments that he won’t our team won’t get better, please stop the silliness. Do you see our record?? ONE AND NINE. So don’t tell me he won’t help us, it’s not like we’re gonna get worse.

The bigger problem I see is that he’s a very similar player to Al Harrington, in that, Iverson has a high chance that he disrupts the flow of the offense by iso-ing and trying to create himself.

However, the difference here is that I think Iverson is a superior player to Al Harrington and his creating will actually be a positive. He can create space by driving in the lane and has at least some semblence of some passing vision, something outside of Gallo, everyone lacks on this team.

Besides, it’s one year, and like a lot of ppl have commented above, he could become a trade asset to a contender if they really want him. Worst case scenario, we suck just as much right now and stunt some of DWTDD playing time (which might not happen at the rate Duhon is playing) and we don’t see him ever again past the 2009/10 season. Best case, Iverson creates a spark plug, we win some additional games, and package him to another team with one of our toxic contracts.

by philee on Nov 17, 2009 10:27 AM EST reply actions  

I like it but...

His back he will put the whole team on,
without him, playoffs, oh dream on,
but no bench TD
so what i’d like to see
is the waivers for ol’ Chrissy Duhon.

The Knicks are 1-9, and have not had good point guard play. It’s clear Duhon is not in the plans after this year. Iverson is confident and ballsy, and I believe he can still play. On most teams, I don’t think he’d be very useful. But on the Knicks, with their offensive stagnation, I think he’s actually a perfect fit.

But I don’t want him to interfere with Toney’s development. So if they do this, they need to drop or find some way to trade Duhon for another expiring. What you offer Iverson is this: Put on the Knicks uniform and light up the garden. You have one chance to prove your detractors wrong, put this team on your back, and lead it to the playoffs for one more shot. Play him at point guard with Hughes or N8, at shooting guard with Douglas. That’s some exciting guard combos right there.

I believe Iverson is sincere when he says he would like to help the young guys, but he’s got to do it as a starter with minutes. I think they have a shot to make the playoffs with him. And it’s understood – this is Iverson’s last stand. Your job is to get us to the playoffs and help train Toney Douglas for the job.

I think it would be exciting and interesting. I do think Iverson’s got a lot left in the tank. But I don’t know about how he affects Toney Douglas. Maybe if you started Douglas and Iverson it might work.

by fuhry on Nov 17, 2009 10:52 AM EST reply actions  

I think you are right

Its easy to discount the playoffs, but even at 1-9, its not out of the question. We DO have some talent, we just haven’t unleashed it in the form of a team yet. We are a team in need of a veteran who can talk and walk. An inspired veteran may just make pieces click. THAT is the kind of thing LeBron or Wade, or other big name FAs want to see. If they watch a proven vet come in and see a big change in effort and such, they might just say “well, hell, if Iverson can bring out their good basketball, imagine what I can do!”

by Chris Child's Fist on Nov 17, 2009 11:02 AM EST up reply actions  

i'm with you guys

i was down with iverson during the off season, i thought he would be solid. and seriously, anything to have less duhon-esque pithy drives to the hoop.

twitter.com/aighttho
http://howmuchyouthink.tumblr.com/

by stingy d on Nov 17, 2009 11:44 AM EST up reply actions  

I don't see why not.

Let’s be honest here…we look like a high school squad right now, not even a good one either, we are talking JV status. The playoffs was wishful thinking before the season started and has since devolved into downright delusion. Yes it’s still early, but this team has a kinda track record for disappointment and I don’t think we have the manpower to turn it around.

So Why Not?

Worse case we’ll continue to lose like we would have anyway and A. I. , Dantoni and Walsh can all say they tried their best.

Best case A. I. re-energizes the team gives us some spark, we still may not see playoff action, but our confidence would boost and we’d pick up a few more wins.

I’m not concerned with Iverson hurtin the young guns cuz he’s not here yet and Dantoni is hurtin them. The best man should play and either Dantoni should learn that or get the boot. If The Answer comes aboard and starts being The Problem should TD start to blow up then we can toss him aside much like the Grizz’s did.

As for A. I. not fittin in, disrupting chemistry or being washed up? 1st, what chemistry??? 2nd the mans numbers have been on decline because his minutes have declined. The nuggets are the only team to improve without him and there are other factors involved with that success besides of ridding Iverson. Stop frontin like the nuggs were terrible with Iverson there cuz they won more than 45 games each of the two seasons he was there.

I’m not sayin make a move to make one, but he is better than any option we have at the one or two right now, He gives his all on the floor and he can handle putting a game on his shoulders.

I don’t think Iverson at first will be a fit for the system but so what…Dantoni managed to convince us Duhon was, am I right?

Leave TD’s minutes alone, Trade Duhon for a case of hot dogs and toiletry supplies and sign Iverson to start and play the one. That all.

What did the 5 fingers say to the face?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7CBwX1891A
HaHaHaHa!

by Lord Smackington on Nov 17, 2009 11:32 AM EST reply actions  

I want to sign him so much,
Because our current team sucks,
But while he makes tickets sell,
The young guys won’t develop as well,
And so as usual we seem to be stuck.

by StarksMiddleFinger on Nov 17, 2009 11:33 AM EST reply actions  

get rid of duhon

and Toney Douglas can still DWTDD without losing minutes. If we can’t trade him (New Orleans may take him in no???) then have him kidnapped and stuck in an abandoned warehouse for a month having him watch game footage of repeated “Du Turns” for the duration of his stay. His unexplained absence would give the Knicks grounds for termination!!!

What did the 5 fingers say to the face?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7CBwX1891A
HaHaHaHa!

by Lord Smackington on Nov 17, 2009 11:43 AM EST up reply actions  

+1

Honestly, they’re already paying Duhon no matter what. If they drop Duhon and pick up Iverson, you don’t think they’ll make that 2 million back in tickets and revenue? And if they make the playoffs, it’s well worth it. Even if they don’t I think he’ll return on the investment.

I’m pretty sure Dolan won’t see it that way though.

by fuhry on Nov 17, 2009 12:03 PM EST up reply actions  

for what it's worth

my mom thinks this limerick should win an award. seriously.

by Seth on Nov 18, 2009 11:48 AM EST up reply actions  

Duhon

Duhon only has a 1 yr left in his contract just waive him, hughes is much better than duhon and if you cut duhon douglass will keep him minutes and iverson on the decline is still better than duhon so yea sign iverson up for a 1 yr deal nd seeing nate and iverson on the same time would be pretty cool Iverson can still score especially in D’antoni’s system so i think it would work pretty good and well im tired of seeing teams using our draft pick to get a good player so i dont want utah to have a good pick at this point id sign anyone to help the knicks lets get camby resign spreewell lol i just want to see a few more wins lol

by arangowarrior on Nov 17, 2009 12:07 PM EST reply actions  

NO!!!!!

1:He’s on the wrong side of 30 and has a bad back

2:He’s a ball hog.Taking away more touches for Gallo

3:As soon as he does not get enough Minutes he will bitch to the NY papers and that will lead to more chaos around the Knicks

4:TD won’t be able to DWTDD

I don’t know what the ANSWER is for this years Knicks but it’s not A.I

DO WHAT JOSE REYES DO!!!

by Jadden Hopkins on Nov 17, 2009 12:08 PM EST reply actions  

if we trade for AI
Im not gonna lie
the games will be more fun
a real baller to run and gun
but it could also really suck ass

by gbaked on Nov 17, 2009 12:13 PM EST reply actions  

2 troo

twitter.com/aighttho
http://howmuchyouthink.tumblr.com/

by stingy d on Nov 17, 2009 12:21 PM EST up reply actions  

I figure

if we got him… i am down. Cant get any worse then whats goin on now.

I also think AI would be happy as the #1 option in NYC.
If it doesnt work out, he can be dropped.

But if we dont get him, I wont be mad.

either way Duhon is starting to really piss me off and he needs to change his game around ASAP.

by gbaked on Nov 17, 2009 12:40 PM EST up reply actions  

i'm sayin tho

yo seth, you used to do lookalikes, whats up? not until we win again or something?

twitter.com/aighttho
http://howmuchyouthink.tumblr.com/

by stingy d on Nov 17, 2009 12:43 PM EST reply actions  

Look...

How many times do we bitch that our young guys don’t have that killer instinct???

Chandler should drive more, Duhon needs to jus lay the damn ball in, Hill looks hesitant, yada,yada, yada.

I myself have wished for the gallant cock to bitch smack his teammates around until they pass him the damned ball more.

Why wouldn’t these younglings respond or learn from a Vet like A. I. who not only has that aggressive instinct but the talent to back it up.

Did he not help bring along another A. I. currently in Philly in Andre Iguana, who just happens to scorch us anytime we play them. And Melo had nothing but praise for him. Imagine if he could help mold Chandler into something formidable.

What did the 5 fingers say to the face?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7CBwX1891A
HaHaHaHa!

by Lord Smackington on Nov 17, 2009 1:07 PM EST reply actions  

do it

Although everyone says hes a cancer
A.I. could be “The Answer”
He’ll play for one year
And then he’ll be gone
Our cap will be clear
And we’ll go get LeBron

by Danny Walz on Nov 17, 2009 2:45 PM EST reply actions  

This has made my lunch break more fun!

Although my eyes turn red and almost bleed,
When I see Duhon meandering and killing our speed,
I think in the year 2010 at last,
We’ll be glad that on the Answer we passed,
Because our young core will have the experience they need.

by StarksMiddleFinger on Nov 17, 2009 3:21 PM EST reply actions  

though you have extra syllables, yes
my response is a marv albert “Yes!”
for our kids to mature
they need time on the floor
and not cleaning up Iverson’s mess

by fuhry on Nov 17, 2009 3:56 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm getting cold feet about it now

The guy has a very high opinion of himself and he likes to skip practices. He is very skilled and I do think he would help them score more points, and they would probably win more games.

I’m just wondering if it might be better to put Toney in charge and see if he can figure it out how to lead the team, rather than putting him in a situation where he is deferring to another guy that.

One thing I’ve always believed is that the great point guards (and any great player really) sometimes does not agree with his coach and kind of vetos his instructions on the floor. I always thought that a little dissent between point guard and coach is a good thing, and I think you’ll get that with Iverson, and that’s something maybe Toney should learn. But the ’I’m better than everyone else’ attitude? Not so much.

by fuhry on Nov 17, 2009 3:46 PM EST reply actions  

Forget AI

Monta Ellis is on the block and it’d be nice to see the Knicks go after him…

Looking for in depth solid basketball analysis? Try www.basketballfreeforall.com!

by RedHopeful on Nov 17, 2009 3:54 PM EST reply actions  

that'd be worse than getting Iverson.

He has a big contract, is not a PG and no more than a taller Nate Robinson

PASS!!!!!!!!!!

"It ain't over till its over"---

by FreeBradshaw on Nov 17, 2009 4:24 PM EST up reply actions  

plus...

I don’t really think they’re trading him after unloading Captain Jack. I also don’t think the Knicks have a single part other than Gallo that could get Ellis.

So

DOUBLE PASS!!!!!

"It ain't over till its over"---

by FreeBradshaw on Nov 17, 2009 4:25 PM EST up reply actions  

not worth it.

That’s an enormous contract for a guy that’s good, but not great.

by fuhry on Nov 17, 2009 5:21 PM EST up reply actions  

?????

Has anyone here even been to a Knick game this year? Aside from Gallo….not one competitor on the court . At this point you gotta put whatever reservations you have about AI to the side and admit he will reduce the suck factor at the Garden. Plain and simple you sign him. No Brainer.

by mightykingcrayon on Nov 17, 2009 4:51 PM EST reply actions  

UMMM, what this the problem with basketball fans

OF COURSE you sign Iverson for a one year deal. OF COURSE. This is about respect. We need to win, and we need to make the fucking playoffs no matter what. I like toney douglas too, but he shouldnt be playing 35 a night just yet. And I like Nate even more, but we dont have the balls to play him 35 a night.
But I do know this, if I have to watch Duhon or Hughes waddling up the court with the ball in their hands one more fucking time, I will shit my pants all over everything. Every time a coach or player lists a whole bunch of things wrong, and says thats it I dont have any answers, they should be FIRED because the answer is our point guard fucking sucks. Ill take the Iverson of 5 years from now, for a cheap one year deal. He is not old at all.

by teksurgical on Nov 17, 2009 4:59 PM EST reply actions  

i think my dad said it best last night

“The Knicks are already a circus, what’s another clown?”

Ewing with the step...YES! and the foul!

by Anthony Masons Haircut on Nov 17, 2009 5:03 PM EST reply actions  

Why not?

It’s not like AI is going to ruin the Knicks’ current roster of upstanding citizens. He can play instead of Duhon.
Anyone who is making Chris Duhon not play is probably good for the Knicks.

I support the Tornado Release ... and Young Bucks.

by Prevenge on Nov 17, 2009 5:16 PM EST reply actions  

conundrum

catch 22. riddle.

On one hand, the team could hardly get worse…

On the other, AI is nowhere near as quick or speedy as he used to be. He doesn’t seem close to the player he once was. Can he run in the uptempo offense and be effective? Is he fast enough?

Is is worth “sucking up to LeBron’s agent” to sign AI’s diminished skills and all of his baggage? Unfortunately, since we’re 1-9, the answer is maybe.

by M. on Nov 17, 2009 5:27 PM EST reply actions  

lebron and AI

have the same agent?!?!?!?

wow. um… now I fall into the sign him for 1 year and more then he is worth to make them all real happy.

by gbaked on Nov 17, 2009 5:56 PM EST up reply actions  

group

i fall into that group

by gbaked on Nov 17, 2009 5:56 PM EST up reply actions  

since he has the same agent...

wouldn’t that be another reason to NOT sign him?

Couldn’t his agent say…re-sign AI and you can get Lebron, if not…piss off?

Might get stuck with this fool for another year.

PASS!

"It ain't over till its over"---

by FreeBradshaw on Nov 18, 2009 3:04 PM EST up reply actions  

One thing you guys in the "why not" court underestimate.

Iverson is a cancer. The guy is not good for any wins, you gotta be nuts if you think he is.

Is the Knicks problem scoring? Is it ?

No, its defense. Iverson’s not gonna help them this year cuz he’s a ballhog and a cancer of a teammate.

PASS!

"It ain't over till its over"---

by FreeBradshaw on Nov 17, 2009 5:45 PM EST reply actions  

except when he

went to the finals
won mvp
went to the playoffs with the nugs in the west.

he is a damn good player.

fact: if we were to sign AI, he would be the best player on our team. Prob the best player we have had the past few years.

he would also say lots of funny things that we can laugh about.

by gbaked on Nov 17, 2009 5:54 PM EST up reply actions  

The East was horrible then

He WAS a good player.

He IS a cancer now cuz he still thinks he’s the same player.

I guess he might make this season a bit more watchable so maybe that’s the whole point of it.

That’s all he’s gonna bring. Wins? I doubt it.

He didn’t help Melo, K-Mart and Nene win any games (they won in spite of AI)

"It ain't over till its over"---

by FreeBradshaw on Nov 17, 2009 6:45 PM EST up reply actions  

Yo Free

Is it just me, or has everyone gone fucking crazy?

Does ANYONE remember Stephon Marbury?
Does ANYONE remember what Iverson JUST DID to the Grizzlies?

Jesus Christ, guys, you really want to bring in a fucking over-the-hill headcase to soak up minutes in the backcourt just because he was exciting once upon a time?

Why is everyone saying he’s good?
He is a terrible player.

If you want Allen Iverson on the Knicks this year, you have not been following them for the past few years. You’ve simply forgotten that we’ve been screaming to get younger and stop signing overpaid combo guards past their primes (Hey Steph! Whaddup Franchise!)

It’s almost comical that motherfuckers want to sign Iverson.

Are people really reading this shit online and saying to themselves “Wow, that’s a pretty good idea!”?

The only thing signing Allen Iverson would do is rob the young kids of chances to become on-court leaders. This is just plain silly.

"I'll probably go get lifted right now with Greg. Hey, and come back tomorrow and try to get another win."

-Renaldo

by solanumbrella on Nov 18, 2009 1:43 AM EST up reply actions  

I don't understand it...

what did he do on the Grizzlies to make anyone think he’s still a good player?

HE SIGNED with the Grizzlies. They didn’t start him cuz he sucks and he bitched about it.

Why are the Knicks gonna start him? Why would they start him over Duhon, AI’s not a PG…….

I know the Knicks are in turmoil…but no more than the Grizzlies, and did he make them more entertaining? Was he good for a few wins there?

Leave this asshole alone. Let him sign with the Celtics and put up 20 bricks a game and ruin their season.

"It ain't over till its over"---

by FreeBradshaw on Nov 18, 2009 2:40 PM EST up reply actions  

c'mon man

First…Iverson’s numbers are down yeah…but guess what? His minutes have been down too. He hasn’t started for two seasons, that’ll decrease your numbers. And the whole injury and back problems BS came up when the pistons coach and mngmt was AFRAID to manage the situation and name a clear starter and define roles BEFOREHAND. Is A. I. a brat….probably is, but during gametime he mans up well enuff to lead on the floor and play. His last full season as a starter he did 26 and 8. Even washed up and 2 steps behind he is LIGHT YEARS ahead of Duhon.

And again someone explain why Douglas’ minutes or floor time would be hindered??? If Dantoni were smart he’d reduce Duhon. Hopefully get him traded.

What did the 5 fingers say to the face?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7CBwX1891A
HaHaHaHa!

by Lord Smackington on Nov 18, 2009 4:23 PM EST up reply actions  

I would like 2 see__ (knicks) winn games! What/who-ever it takes.

iverson, curry, Douglas, hill, any change is hope at this point… if iverson is cancer, Knicks will be cancer free at the end of the season. Other’s are starting to look at the knicks in a negative light (a damn joke). With the NY market (profit’s) & History, This is simply unacceptable. Most NBA Players are upset at what the garden has become at this point.
A lay-over game, WHAT A waste!! , I cant believe new yorkers R not ashamed of the constant loosing & ABUSE from ______ . It’s time 2 turn things around NY. Winners win games. Knicks need wins. Do what is necessary to win guys!.

by GKmac on Nov 17, 2009 6:42 PM EST reply actions  

what's the worst that can happen?

I’m sick fo this team losing. I’m so sick of it. I can’t f****** take it anymore.

We look lost at the end of games. How many close games have we lost dating back to the isiah years, because we did have someone that could step up in crunch time? Seth has written about how this team lack leadership. he may fill these voids. granted, these are the words of a desperate man. but I really think Iverson possesses the mindset this team so desperately needs.

by pmsjerk on Nov 17, 2009 8:14 PM EST reply actions  

i'm down

i want to be entertained this year. simple as that. call it childish if you must, this current team is garbage and not the least bit interesting either.

ideally pretty toney would come off the bench to log around 22 mins per game, duhon would log around 12 (and kill both my fantasy teams, yes i am a fucking idiot), and the knicks would have a player with proven clutchness and toughness, and most importantly, swag.

which would fill in for the swag that brandon jennings would have provided. that’s right, i’m still not over it.

by SamH on Nov 17, 2009 9:19 PM EST reply actions  

p.s.

al harrington’s antics do not qualify as swag.

by SamH on Nov 17, 2009 9:20 PM EST up reply actions  

-sigh-

Forget the 1-9 record and forget the fear of duking it out with NJ for worst record in the East.

Let’s forget the “Why Not? We are losing anyway” attitude.

Imagine for a second we have been playing the same exact way with the same exact players for the past ten games and somehow went 5-5….fuck it say we went 10-0.

That still does not excuse or dissolve the glaring problems we have NOW at the present time, not in 2010 or the yr 2012. Yet we refuse to address these issues like they will magically heal themselves.

WE HAVE NO CHEMISTRY!!! Have we all been watching the same games??? How can Allen Iverson destroy the well crafted chemistry this team has built when that chemistry does not exist? Sure the players all like each other….maybe, but that’s not what we are talking about. We really need this team to play TOGETHER which they don’t do now. Even if Iverson does not help that situation he can’t hurt it.

Toney Douglas needs to develop. I agree. I like Toney, in fact Tony is actually my middle name. I think he’s one of the few NBA ready rookies in the league. Why is it people automatically think Iverson will stunt his growth? Why would he eat Toney Douglas’ minutes and not Duhon’s? In fact If that is a concern play Iverson at the two! The only other real SG we have is Hughes. Where is the problem?

Ohhhh A. I. is a cancer!…well guess what , Zach Randolph was regarded as a cancer and despite his tenure with Isiah under Dantoni he played well and behaved…what personal interaction do any of us have with Iverson to think he can’t do the same?

And a one yr vets min contract??? Will someone please explain the risk? If he does become the CANCER instead of the ANSWER we can waive him. Just like the Grizzlies did. Our 2010 plans will not have suffered we’d still have the most cap room in the NBA.

We don’t have to get rid of anyone for him (tho I wouldn’nt mind trading Duhon), He’s cheap, talented and has more WINS and PLAYOFF EXPERIENCE than ANYONE on our roster…maybe even combined.

Aside from all that he’s better at the position than anyone we have and I’ll be damned if anyone tells me different.

Let Iverson shave the heads of a dozen MSG interns before pissing on them and videotaping it, I don’t care. He can play so he should until he does fuck up and then we toss him. And maybe just the threat of Iverson eating into some of these guys playing time will get this team to play with some urgency ALL 4 QUARTERS and maybe pick up some wins. But If not, what have we really lost?

What did the 5 fingers say to the face?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7CBwX1891A
HaHaHaHa!

by Lord Smackington on Nov 17, 2009 11:00 PM EST reply actions  

exquisite analysis Lord TONY Smackington

theres no communication now, how can iverson ruin what does not exist?

by dpileofashes on Nov 18, 2009 12:36 AM EST up reply actions  

Simple

Any hope on achieving positive growth by this team for following seasons would be made that much MORE difficult with the addition of a selfish Iverson. The only chemistry AI would achieve is he gets his and inspires Harrington, Hughes and Nate to follow suit. Our future (Chandler, Gallo and TD) would be left holding their luggage.

Losing sucks, but this team is going through a very bad start. Do you guys honestly expect them to continue their woeful shooting?? (43.4% FG, 28.3% from 3 point range) No f’ing way. I’m sure their woeful shooting is a major reason why their defense is giving up a 50.7% FG to the opposition. Teams are getting numerous breaks on them and in general the players aren’t that motivated to bust it considering their woeful start.

What they NEED to do is figure out who is going to play center. Lee is getting murdered down low. When David is off the floor the Knicks actually average more points per possession than their opponent.

Looking for in depth solid basketball analysis? Try www.basketballfreeforall.com!

by RedHopeful on Nov 18, 2009 10:20 AM EST up reply actions  

I disagree

That is not the ONLY possible outcome.

It’s also possible that he acts up, self destructs and the rest of the team ignore it and do their jobs like the professionals they are paid to be.

It’s also possible that he knows this is his last and perhaps greatest shot at returning to relevance so he keeps himself in check and leads the team the right way.

Agree that we have other problems but Iverson is a very low risk way to alleviate our problem with guard play. Is he the only option? No, but he is one of the best ones and at least one that should be looked at from all angles. Dismissing the idea out right in our current state is lunacy.

Keep in mind Iverson can’t be blamed for any of Memphis’ problems this season because he was cut after 3 games…no risk.

I like the idea of Iverson, I think the right way to do it would to monitor the situation. Meanwhile give Douglas (and not Duhon!!!) the keys a couple of games. If we turn it around and look competent forget Iverson was mentioned. If not you’d be kidding to think that it’s impossible for Iverson to help out. If he proves to be a distraction cut him the very second. You don’t wait until you see him destroy your team every night for 3 months before you cut him…you cut him after 3 games like Memphis…no risk. And if any of our players are weak minded enuff to become corrupted after only 3 games they don’t belong here.

What did the 5 fingers say to the face?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7CBwX1891A
HaHaHaHa!

by Lord Smackington on Nov 18, 2009 5:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes Allen Iverson is crazy and yes he complains a lot. However watching the knicks every night lose isn’t fun. Jordan Hill looks like a bust. Duhon can’t seem to do anything right on the court, and Eddy Curry is a walking heart attack. Dont you think knick fans should get some excitement that we had not have for years. It is only for year anyway.

by knicksyanks on Nov 17, 2009 11:11 PM EST reply actions  

It's all about the current team ...... nothing beyond this year.

Even in his prime, I would have not wanted Iverson if we really were a playoff-bound team. The point mentioned by others (rightly so) is that …… there is no chemistry to ruin on this team.

What I have always admired about Iverson, though, is his energy and the way he continues to push on the court. Yes -- he is a ballhog most of the time. Yes -- he takes ill-advised shots. But, quite honestly, one thing he could impart to the young players on the squad (which they are not getting from the current vets) ….. is an example of someone who plays hard for 48 minutes …… no matter what.

I just think a one-year contract on this Knicks team poses little downside. This is vastly different than Isaiah betting the franchise for the next decade on bringing in Marbury (to which we will still be paying with not having our 1st-round pick this year). That -— was a travesty extraordinaire! Getting Iverson is a blip that will have no bearing on mid or long term strategy for rebuilding the organization.

One last thing to remember -—- this is New York. Although this is not a direct comparison but -— we brought Sprewell in when almost everyone else passed and he was embraced by the Garden fans. I have no illusions that Iverson is capable of getting the Knicks even to a playoff spot but …… NY fans appreciate talent and heart. Iverson has both -— he just has lacked judgement and discipline in his career.

by Jeff I on Nov 18, 2009 8:29 AM EST reply actions  

Why not

give the fans something to watch, even if it is this guy heaving up 40 shots a game…he’ll sign a 1 year deal and he’ll be gone after this season anyway so who cares…lets see what he can bring to the table…at least it’ll be entertainment

by Marshawn Lynch on Nov 18, 2009 11:47 AM EST reply actions  

Iverson limerick

When LeBron is a Big Apple hoopster
I’ll be living on Mars or Jupiter;
     I’d draft a Knicks City Dancer
     If A.I. is the Answer—
The question must be even stupider.

by Marc M on Nov 18, 2009 2:28 PM EST reply actions  

I'm not an Iverson supporter

I am a supporter of the Knicks signing him as a free agent on a 1 yr vets min to hopefully win some games, provide confidence, and make the place more attractive in 2010.

Really it’s quite simple…If we bring him in and he is disruptive cut him loose. Simple, no major cap implications. done deal. adios.

But none of us have a crystal ball and know for a fact he will be disruptive do we?

Anyone remember how everyone was so sure Zach Randolph would “disrupt” the “team”? Now he didn’t always play well and won’t be a garden legend but he stayed out of trouble and was a good teammate.

Jeff also kindly reminded us in the previous comment that the Knicks were in the same situation with Latrell Sprewell! And he not only disrupted his previous team but CHOKED THE DAMN COACH OUT!!! Are you guys kidding me? Not only did Spree go on to be a crucial member of one of the better Knicks teams, he was also a LEADER.

Say what you want about Iverson being disruptive but I’ve never heard Iverson complain about his teammates or his teammates complain about him. It’s always been a situation between coach/player that the media ran away with.

And lets not forget we are hoping to sign LBJ in 2010 (which I would love but don’t think is too likely right now) Lebron is a great player, but cmon…..is he not a bit of a diva??? Is he not a bit disruptive himself? Every week the story is something new with this guy besides who he is playing next. Again I would Looooove to have him, but essentially it would be for the same reason I support a 1 yr Iverson deal…I want us to Win.

Now maybe we get Iverson and don’t win any more games than we would have, but we have to at least TRY to get better, because what we have aint cutting the mustard. He’ll corrupt the team? Fine, Let him! half the team is in free agency next yr. If they start regressing(which by accounts already are without Iverson) or becoming a problem. Fine, place the blame on Iverson but those guys can go too. Anyone who doesn’t prove they’re on board with winning and winning with the team the right way can go.

Lets not let our prejudices and misconceptions about Iverson affect our common sense.

What did the 5 fingers say to the face?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7CBwX1891A
HaHaHaHa!

by Lord Smackington on Nov 18, 2009 3:54 PM EST reply actions  

It makes no sense at all

which means the Knicks will definitely do it. Welcome to NY A.I.

by Shivling on Nov 18, 2009 7:55 PM EST reply actions  

where have you gone Joe Domagio..err..Willis Reed...

I was in high school when I saw the team that I grew up rooting for win their championship back in the 70’s….it was a team of personalities, modest talent and overachievement, but it was a team of CHARACTER. I now live in Michigan, where last year I saw a great TEAM dismantled to get into the 2010 sweepstakes. And lo and behold, AI was brought in,, to the total detriment of what was left of the TEAM. Within weeks, the Pistons were a shell of themselves. PLEASE DO NOT DEFAME THE MEMORIES OF PEOPLE LIKE WILLIS REED, WALT FRAZIER AND DAVE DEBUSSHERE WITH ALLEN IVERSON IN A KNICK JERSEY. Play the kids, we love seeing em grow in front of our eyes and maybe your plans for savior(s) will bear fruit next year, AND you will know which of these kids are good piece to put around the SAVIOR.

by AlStar9111 on Nov 18, 2009 10:53 PM EST reply actions  

I feel genuinely dirty for this but...

Joe DiMaggio deserves his name spelled right. Sorry man, I don’t mean to be like that. Its the yankees in my blood…

by Chris Child's Fist on Nov 19, 2009 10:30 AM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Posting and Toasting: Blogging the Knicks Robin Hood-Style Since 2007

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Ed-in-chief_small
Updated Knick Pride 2.0: Bocker Bench goes bonkers
Ed-in-chief_small
Knick Pride
Jorts6_small
Next Season's Roster and the Cap and the Tax

Recent FanPosts

Small
The Draft Workouts - What does Math Show Us?
Small
Tyson Chandler NOT on NBA All-Defensive team???
Small
If you were Lin's Agent, would you Pick the Knicks?
Small
American in Taiwan Jeremy & Woodson
Clydeuglysuit_small
Proposed Amare TRAID!
Ed-in-chief_small
Knick Pride 5.0: Spread the love
Ed-in-chief_small
Updated Knicks Pride 4.0: The funny and derpy!
Ed-in-chief_small
Updated Knick Pride 3.0: Eye candy for the ladies (Men, enter at your own risk)

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >