Knicks 106, Nets 97
Like many Knicks games this season, tonight's win over the Nets was a tale of two halves. Thankfully, the opponent was helpless enough to render New York's own mood swings less than fatal. In the first half, we saw the familiar Knicks. They actually scored pretty effectively, but gave the Nets absolutely anything they wanted on the other end. The first two quarters today comprised the Nets' best half of the season. They league's worst team scored 61 points in the opening periods, keyed by Devin Harris, who drove to the rim and pulled-up from midrange pretty much unimpeded. In the second half? 36. The Knicks tightened up their defense and (aided slightly by the Nets' natural instincts to implode) turned a losing effort into a decisive win.
Notes, after the jump...
- Danilo Gallinari was back in uniform tonight (with a shooter's sleeve!), but Mike D'Antoni opted to ride the hot hand and keep Al Harrington in the starting lineup, which paid off nicely. From the outset, Al recognized the speed advantage he had over Josh Boone and exploited it mercilessly. Harrington's spin move is deadly, and he utilized it early and often to blow past Boone and finish at the rim. On the game, Al limited himself to only three threes, and did most of his work around the basket. He didn't just score either, finishing with a superb 24 points (10-18), 14 boards, and 5 assists in 40 minutes. Al's a hell of a player, and if he was always this motivated, nobody would be in favor of trading him.
- Just to emphasize that the quality of Harrington's dominant performance was a welcome departure from the usual, Clyde reacted to a gorgeous pass thrown Al to David Lee with "where did that come from!?".
- David Lee couldn't do much to stop Brook Lopez on offense (as Clyde said, "size matters"), but give credit to both Lee and Harrington for superb box-outs throughout the game. Lopez was muscled out of a number of rebounds, and finished with only 6 of his own. Lee and Harrington had 9 and 14 boards respectively, and worked hard for them.
- Lee also had his offense going, and kept Lopez honest by nailing his mid-range jumpers. That opened up the paint for Lee and others, as big Brookie had to step out to contest the J. That's an under-rated weapon, and it was a pleasure to see Dave score confidently from outside.
- Chris Duhon started attacking the rim, but just couldn't get a roll. He ended up 2-12, but I will say that he was, for the most part, missing the kinds of shots we'd like to see him take. There were more quick drives to the rim and less out-of-rhythm threes. That counts for something, I think. Not a great game, though.
- Danilo Gallinari made a relatively brief appearance today, probably owing to both his still-injured forearm and the recent resurgence of Al Harrington. Gallo was able to make an impact in his 21 minutes, though, with 3 three-pointers and 4 rebounds to his name.
- The Knicks were at their very worst in the second quarter, and it was a little disarming. One would like to think that the main advantage the Knicks have over a team like the Nets is their second unit, but Kiki Vandeweghe's bench thrived against the second-string Knicks. Rafer Alston (3-11) didn't shoot well, but had an easy team finding teammates like Keyon Dooling (4-7) for open shots. The pace quickened in the second, which you would think of as Knick-friendly, but New Jersey actually opened up a double-digit lead for part of the quarter.
- Chris Douglas-Roberts is very talented, very cool, and makes Joey look very wise. I love Gallo and wouldn't change a thing about that draft, but...damn.
- I'm disappointed in Clyde for not rhyming "Dooling" with something.
- This game was especially well mic'd, and we got to hear a lot of the on-court banter, including Al Harrington, after taking a hard fast break foul from Devin Harris, grumbling "I'm never gonna try and dunk again" while being peeled off the floor.
- Mike D'Antoni wielded his zone defense a few times, including in that second quarter in order to stifle the Nets' run. It worked pretty nicely for stretches, as Jared Jeffries or Wilson Chandler was able to roam the middle and help out on Brook Lopez to limit his touches and force other Nets to create offense.
- Al Trautwig casually snuck in a pretty ominous line during the halftime show: "The Knicks are what Chris Duhon is". Yikes.
- The young Garden audience (it was a noon start) spent much of the second half huffing and puffing at Mike D'Antoni's doghouse, begging for Nate Robinson. Chants of "we want Nate!" rained down even as the Knicks pulled away for the win, which leads me to conclude that the majority of New York-area youth don't do what Toney Douglas do just yet. This disappoints me. Weren't you little brats listening?
- In the third quarter, it was Larry Hughes of all people that keyed the run that eventually became the win. Hughes scored 12 in the period, including a personal stretch of 8 straight, and the Nets could never recover. Can't blame them. I've only just recovered.
- The guy who initiates that "I SAY D, YOU SAY FENSE!" chant sounds a lot like Xzibit to me. Since I haven't been to a game in a while, I'm gonna go ahead and assume that the Garden hype guy actually is Xzibit, since that's not at all out of the question, given his other work.
The Knicks have now won three of their last four, and look to add to their recent success tomorrow night against the Blazers. I have to be in class for pretty much the duration of the game (I know, right?), so I'll be in the market for a guest-recapper if anybody's interested. Let me know.
0 recs |
19 comments
|
Comments
think about this...
If the knicks had won their 3 overtime games, they would be in sole possession of the 8th seed. is it safe to say they aren’t as bad as we think?
I was at the game today, chanting “we want nate” (i dont even really want him in, but fan-generated chants are awesome, they remind me of the fire-isiah days). I’ll be there tomorrow as well, hopefully we can keep this going.
fatman scoop
pretty sure thats the when i say d yall say fense dude.
if u dont kno what he sounds like youtube him and after like 10 seconds of listening you will agree with me
trade proposal
since we’re playing portland can donnie have a sit down with the portland gm and get some andrew miller discussion going on. it doesn’t seem like he’s really working out for them. Can they please take jeffries from us? This system needs a PG to run the offense. Possibly even trade lee although it eats into next years cap. Any thoughts?
one bad conctract that ends in 2011
for another that ends in 2012?
no thanks.
Ever think Andre Miller is not playing much in Portland for a reason?
"It ain't over till its over"---
actually
the last year of andre miller’s contract is not guaranteed. so we could let him walk in 2011
still...
a bad contract that goes through 2011 for someone who isn’t playing for a reason.
Why trade one for another?
Knicks didn’t sign him in the offseason cuz he wanted a similar contract from them.
PASS.
"It ain't over till its over"---
we all know why miller on the trade block.
Because they have Blake, they shocked me by getting Miller in the first place. We need a good point guard for D’Antoni’s system. Miller is one of the top 5 point guard inthe last 10 years. GET HIM. This trade would be better than trading our best player for Tyus Thomas thats for sure!!
miller..no thanks..
is miller worth getting a 2-3 year contract? on a over 30 yrs old pg?
- thats a bad signing on portlands part.. dont want that to fall on us
- we can get, and will get plenty of other trade opportunities tthe rest of the trade season, im no fan of duhon but jumping teh gun on a player like miller isnt a good risk/reward move.
- waht about mike james?!
eh
I may not be the most partial but I’m with whatever gets Duhon out of the starter spot.
I give the guy a lot of flak(which is not all on him) it’s just, he’s not a starter. A very good back up maybe but not an NBA starter. I would start the decomposing remains of my Labrador Smooches over Duhon.
Duhon for 10-20 mins a night I can cope with, but this 40 mins a night fumbling and tumbling routine is maddening.
Don’t get me wrong, he’ll have a good game every now and then, but is a good game every now and then what you want from your starting point.
I won’t go to hard on the subject cuz we’re on a lil hot streak but Nate’s not playin, I’m sure he’s not happy, he does love the blazers and his contract + Richardsons trd exception match up real nice with Miller’s
Note: I would never trade Nate 4 Miller if I ran a team but it looks like Dantoni is giving N8 the Marbury treatment so If I’m the Knicks I’d consider trading a player who is not gettin burn for one who could possibly get burn and be more efficient than our current crappy starter. I’d rather trade Duhon straight up 2b honest
What did the 5 fingers say to the face?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7CBwX1891A
HaHaHaHa!
by Lord Smackington on Dec 7, 2009 11:49 AM EST reply actions
quick hits
1st – I think its easy to look at how Miller’s time in Portland and judge his skills. But he has proven himself to be a very efficient PG over the years and I think it could be a sneaky move to swipe him from Portland. A lot of people are surprised at McMillan’s choice to stay with Blake, but it sounds like the chemistry between Miller and Brandon Roy isn’t so smooth. We could use Miller who would push Duhon to the bench and I would feel much better having Toney Douglas learn from him instead of a career backup PG.
2nd – Seems to me, though I didn’t watch the game yesterday, that NJ’s bench out scored ours largely because we don’t really have a 2nd unit. What was it? Hughes, Gallo, and Toney Douglas? I mean, had we used Nate, I’m sure the scoring would definitely differ. I actually agree with D’Antoni’s message to him, but i think 3 DNP-CDs is plenty. I believe the message has been sent and received, especially since Nate’s crimes were largely very minor. I think we have been mostly fortunate to have won 2 games without Nate. I wouldn’t say we are better off without him at all.
by Chris Child's Fist on Dec 7, 2009 12:09 PM EST reply actions
Didnt we talk about andre miller enough over the summer?
donnie walsh looked at him closely and decided not to offer him a multiyear deal last summer. Clearly he passed on him wasting 2010 cap. now that miller got the deal we wouldn’t give him i wouldnt expect walsh to go after him
But this time we wouldn’t just be taking on his salary. We’d be giving away salary too, so it’s different.
Yeah
im sure donnie only looks into it if either a jeffries or curry accompanies a lee or nate. otherwise, furgedaboutet
yep just saying if they want to move miller bad enough maybe they will take back..
.. a contract from us that runs into next year. As previously stated Miller only has a two year contract year three is a team option not a player option.
maybe tonight...
Jeffires playing well could showcase him to the Blazers?
Also, no Oden could mean they need a bigish dude.
I’d trade Jeffries for Miller, maybe throw in Mobley’s carcass.
"It ain't over till its over"---
by FreeBradshaw on Dec 7, 2009 10:25 PM EST up reply actions
i agree man. its a good dealif one of those cap fillers (curry or jeffries) is sent along for the ride to the portland
Miller is absolutely an upgrade for NY, especially because we have no need for those other 2 guys. I’d do it if they take nate and one of the others, but wouldnt if its lee and one of the others. Wish we knew if knicks brass was planning to make TD the pg of the future or not.

by 

















