Knicks 112, Hawks 108 (OT)
Not a bad way to kick off a new year, eh? This will not be a typical recap because this was not a typical game.
In case you missed it, Nate Robinson just stomped the Hawks. In his first game out of the doghouse, Nate threw crisp, decisive assists, boarded like a big man, and stuck his man on defense. Oh, and he scored, too. A bunch. Nate made sweet music from just about everywhere, and most critically, connected in crunchtime. Down the stretch, Robinson was accurate from the arc up to the iron, posting 25 big boy points in the fourth quarter and overtime. A list of individuals who flat-out couldn't hang with Nate isn't hard to find. Nate Robinson was unstoppable tonight. All told, it was 41 points, 8 assists, 6 rebounds, and countless pants soiled.
Now, listen here. Every smartass in New York has an opinion about what just happened. Some are taking tonight's events as evidence that Mike D'Antoni is an obstinate bum for having shelved such an electric talent. Maybe the Knicks could have been better than 8-6 in the last month if Nate got to spin. Others see Nate's explosion as a product of his benching. Nate himself admitted that the visit to the doghouse humbled him. Maybe D'Antoni's a disciplinary genius for finding a way to reach Robinson? Looking back, the last month either lacked Nate Robinson or honed Nate Robinson's professional game. That's if you choose to look back.
I'll tell you who's not looking back: Nate Robinson. Neither is Mike D'Antoni. Nor the rest of the Knicks. Nate Robinson has returned, and all that matters is what's to come. You, me, and D'Antoni knew Nate could take over a game with his scoring. What we saw tonight was competent point guard play, disciplined defense, and a little less preening. With or without the points, Nate Robinson has a place on the Knicks if he brings all of the above. It's all about filling a need, and the Knicks needed a hero tonight. Mission accomplished.
A few other notes, after the jump...
- I can't imagine a more fitting career night for Wilson Chandler than 24, 17, and 4 while Nate was making headlines. Chandler's offense was smooth and in-rhythm, and he got huge on the boards while David Lee struggled. No doubt that Nate was the man tonight, but Wil made a difference as well in his own quiet way.
- Lee struggled indeed, but not for lack of effort. Al Horford's a big, scary kid.
- The organist at Philips Arena is a goddamn beast. We're talking about minute-long renditions of everything from oldies to top-40 hits that stand up to the originals without fail.
- This one's for stingy: Chris Duhon has stepped up his game lately, but Robinson made him look like a gosh darned mope tonight. Nate did absolutely everything better than Du did.
- The Hawks missed oodles of open threes tonight. Just saying. Don't yell at me.
- Marcus Landry, y'all! Marcus snuck onto the court behind Robinson and had a few rebounds and a very fancy and-one in five minutes.
- Other than that, it was really a 7-man rotation. Larry Hughes and Jonathan Bender both sat with sore body parts.
- The Hawks announcers (one of whom is Dominique Wilkins) certainly aren't homers, but it really bugs me when commentators call the players by their first names.
- Relatively quiet game for Danilo Gallinari (13 and 6), but he hit some big, big shots in the second half.
- The Knicks played a startlingly effective zone in the fourth quarter and overtime. Credit Jared Jeffries with filling the middle of the zone and doing the talking to make the whole thing work.
And that is all. It's just one game, but you can be damn certain it was Nate Robinson's game. The Knicks are back in action on Sunday against the Pacers.
Happy New Year, friends.
35 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Corey Webster
Talented cornerback on the Giants
In 2007, he was inactive for several games, and it looked like his career was going to end. Injuries forced the Giants to bring him back in, and he was a key part of the super bowl run.
He said afterwards that his benching was a wake up call.
Maybe N8 needed the wakeup call too
My wife's great grandfather
owned a large painting contractor business in the San Francisco bay area. Was known far and wide as first class SOB
If a job was going poorly, he would drive up, go to the foreman, and ask who the best worker on the job was. He would then fire the best worker.
His theory was that if the other workers saw him fire the worst workers, they would say, “OK, I am better than that guy”, and figure that they didn’t have to improve. but…if they saw him fire the best, they knew nobody was safe. So they worked a whole lot harder.
Oh – the best worker would then get reassigned to another job
On the subject of first names
I love that Clyde still calls Jamal by his first name. Commentators calling the players on their own team by their first names doesn’t bother me, it makes me feel like they know them well because they’re specific to that team. Obviously anyone can call the one-namers (LeBron, Kobe, etc) by their first names.
Good for D'Antoni / Good for Nate
I think they both come off looking good in this. D’Antoni deserves credit for not backing down on his principals and keeping Nate out long enough to get his point(s) across. At the same time, he also deserves credit for not being so dogmatic and inflexible that his decision to keep Nate out ended up being the type of discipline that was unjustified punishment and thus unproductive.
On Nate’s end -- give him a ton of credit for not sulking, continuing to work hard and being absolutely prepared to come back with a flourish (and, it looks like, some real lessons learned). Nate has great athleticism and the type of unique talent that allows him to take over a game at times (as evidenced by his performance last night). If he can sustain some necessary discipline, his upside could be huge.
It’s too bad none of Marbury’s coaches ever reigned him in for a significant stretch when he was a younger player. Had they done it and had he shown the character to not sulk and learn some lessons, he could have been a great NBA player.
I gotta love D' Antoni
We all know Nate can score, but before this benching, we could never see him impact a game the way he did against the Hawks. Let’s use the game against the magic for example. Nate was unstoppable in the 4th quarter, but couldn’t play D if his life depended on it. This benching made him more mature. It made him realize that he has to stop going nuts after every basket ( he still was hyped, but at least when it was a 3- point play and he didn’t have to get back on defense) and just get back and play defense. He also got the rest of the team involved (8 assists) and was rebounding well ( 6 rebounds). Hopefully this is the start of a new beginning for Nate. This team needs him to play at his best level for us to win. Its a fact we must face.
this win
has me at a loss in finding a proper explanation.
fire D’Antoni? through a parade for D’Antoni? start Nate? re-bench Nate? what about starting Curry in hopes that he can respond (50/25 average) in similar fashion?
Ewing with the step...YES! and the foul!
by Anthony Masons Haircut on Jan 2, 2010 9:29 AM EST reply actions
*throw
Ewing with the step...YES! and the foul!
by Anthony Masons Haircut on Jan 2, 2010 9:29 AM EST up reply actions
It's not obvious that the benching changed Nate.
Nate played awesome, but it’s not like he’s never done this before. He’s had spectacular games like this one in the past. Maybe even better ones.
Sadly, he still can’t run the pick and roll yet.
"Dishin' and swishin' in transition"
by Serious Garbage Time on Jan 2, 2010 9:53 AM EST reply actions
Can't judge that until he plays in a game where D-Lee isn't rendered useless.
by PrivateRadio on Jan 2, 2010 10:51 AM EST up reply actions
I hope you're right
But I remember watching a sequence where Lee picked and was wide open on the roll but Nate didn’t see him.
Nate is a good passer though, so there’s hope.
"Dishin' and swishin' in transition"
by Serious Garbage Time on Jan 2, 2010 11:52 AM EST up reply actions
it's partially a matter of doing it (pause)
repetition. in game. anything du can do, nate can do better.
twitter.com/aighttho
http://howmuchyouthink.tumblr.com/
And let us all say
Amen
"Dishin' and swishin' in transition"
by Serious Garbage Time on Jan 2, 2010 12:57 PM EST up reply actions
i'd live and die with nate
before duhon any day.
twitter.com/aighttho
http://howmuchyouthink.tumblr.com/
+1
Nate is better at every aspect of the game except passing to lee on the P&R, but that will come with practice since nate is a 10x better athlete.
word aaaap
i mean nate is more likely to make a tough shot. more likely to get to the line. more likely to get a tough rebound. more likely to get a steal.
nate pushes the tempo. duhon does not. i just rewatched the game. duhon basically never sprints. it takes duhon between 6 and 8 seconds to jog across half court. when nate jogs it only takes him 3 or 4.
the thing i really see that duhon excels at and nate struggles with is anticipating the pick and roll. duhon sees it before it happens all the time nate only sees it sometimes. HOWEVER, give nate 30 picks a night and things will change. it’s inevitable.
twitter.com/aighttho
http://howmuchyouthink.tumblr.com/
way too theoretical for me.
put your best players on the court. at this point i have more confidence in jeffreis than i do with duhon. jeffries has come a long way. but still, duhon has done nothing to improve his game, and he still can’t be trusted with the ball in his hands late in the game.
i don’t understand why duhon gets all this faith man. he’s not even greg anthony status.
twitter.com/aighttho
http://howmuchyouthink.tumblr.com/
After 1 game I'm not making any judgements as to the benching
I wanna see how the next 3 games go. This could have been an adrenaline game for Nate. I’d love to see a win streak start out of this. Then of course I’m gonna praise D’Antoni for reigning in Nate, and Nate for being ready to perform at a high level. Soon as that’s done, I’m gonna take one last swipe at December because I am sure we would have had a much better record had this benching been cut in half.
but did anyone notice that through the post games, Nate again made his case to stay in New York? He’s got my vote.
"you're the Rod Thorn in my Chris Bosh side."
by Chris Child's Fist on Jan 2, 2010 12:00 PM EST reply actions
just to say it once
and then let it go.
I would have been way more happier if he had a 20 assist night then a 40 point night. But it is what it is and I will take what we just got 10 times out of 10.
if it happens once
he’ll get addicted to it.
twitter.com/aighttho
http://howmuchyouthink.tumblr.com/
he had 8 assists
thats very good – its not like we have a bunch of superstars on the team that are gonna convert every good pass and get him 14 assists.
I know
I know…
He was doing great last night. I loved it.
Just sayin… My big concern with nate is that I think he is too small to be a SG and I (or Mike D) am not a fan of scoring PGs.
I was being nitpickey… But if he would have come out of the gate and just started dishin to everyone…
They would have missed their shots
And we would’ve lost. STFU plz and thanks.
you know what sorta sucks
but might be a blessing in disguise…. wilson had his best of the season, maybe his career.
twitter.com/aighttho
http://howmuchyouthink.tumblr.com/
Congrats Seth.
Your prediction of best possible scenario was spot on, including Nate referring to himself in the third person during the post game. Got some NY Lotto numbers to share next?

by 

























