Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Infuriating Jose Molina

Have We Lost Faith?

Note: My intentions for the quoting are not to "expose" false predictions. They're here to show the excitement about players who have little to no impact on games. So if I quoted you... Don't take it the wrong way. xmas smiley #4614

Wilson Chandler is not a starting Power Forward, Toney Douglas is not a Point Guard and these are two obvious facts. We know we need a starting Center/Power Forward and a backup Point Guard. So here's where I'm heading, is trading for pieces (or dropping players to pick up someone) to fill those holes extremely necessary? Hmm, let me rephrase that; is it necessary at all? I don't know which side of the seesaw I'm on with this one, maybe at the conclusion of this article I'll come to a decision but I do have some opinions on the situation if you allow me to continue.

I don't usually ask folks to take the jump with me since you know... We don't actually jump in FanPost but go ahead, take the jump if you'd like.

Star-divide

 

So you've probably guessed by now that the point of this post is to somewhat evaluate the rotting talent on our bench and explore the wonderful possibilities of them filling in at some needed positions. First up, The Canadian.

 

Playerprofiles11a_medium

Andy Rautins : Backup Point Guard?

But what is intriguing is that he played PG for the Canadian national team. Who has that on their resume? On Syracuse, Boheim thought of playing him at the 1 this year to enhance his draft potential… but he had other guys to play the one so Rautins seems to have done what’s best for the team.

If he is capable of playing point guard – and he seems to have the intelligence and leadership and passing ability (and outside shooting ability) to do so – not to mention he cares about defense – it kind of changes the game on him. It’s still a big if, but I now see this as a prudent, intelligent second round risk.

by fuhry on Jun 26, 2010 11:03 AM EDT

If I recall correctly, Rautins played a fair share of minutes at the point during the Summer League and I don't remember ever being disgusted nor angered by his play. It was disappointing to see him miss handfuls of open three-pointers but that was my only serious knock on the guy since he was drafted for his range.

We don't need much out of a backup point guard honestly. Someone that can relieve Felton, keep the offense at the right pace, dish out a few assist and knock down a couple of shots per night would be nice. If he could run the PNR and play some defense those are added bonuses. Also, news has gotten out that he previously impressed at the point guard position in practice so the coaches may not be completely against this idea.

So is trading/dropping+adding players necessary for the backup point guard position? Is Andy Rautins the answer?

 

Playerprofiles9a_medium

Timofey Mozgov : Starting Center? Backup Center?

What I like about Timofey MozGov (from seeing videos of him on YouTube), is his defensive awareness…He can grab both offensive and defensive rebounds and can block shots in the paint. I hope he carry that same intensity in New York.

by NYKFan4Life on Jul 27, 2010 9:14 PM EDT

Mozgov looked nice in the FIBA World Championship, I had a pleasure keeping tabs on Mozzy and it was even better seeing him do well during the preseason. I don't know what happened to Ol' Timmy but if "someone put a gun to my head, I'll saaaaaaaaay" that nerves are getting the best of him.

During the World Championship Mozgov showed mean defensive presence, solid screen setting, productive PNR, inside force, his ability to get to the line, he had skills. As of late it seems like all that skill has surrendered to his nerves. Most of his talents are now non-existent. His defense isn't as mean, he's getting called for moving screens, his PNR game were seen in rare instances when he didn't fumble the pass ( In his defense all were not perfect passes for a 7'1 behemoth), his forcefulness shriveled against NBA caliber bigs and he rarely gets to the line. It's like we got the Summer League version of Jerome Jordan in Mozzy!

All of that said there is still reason to believe Mozgov can help this team. We knew he was a project from the beginning, projects usually take time, that's kind of what makes them a project. Maybe all Mozgov needs is some time and confidence.

So is trading/dropping+adding players necessary for the starting Center position? Is Timofey Mozgov the answer?

 

Playerprofiles10a_medium

Anthony Randolph : Starting Power Forward?

It will be up to Dan to bring out the best in Randolph There is a great deal on the line here. If AR improves over last year-which means reducing mistakes- this team will be miles ahead of last year’s team. AR can mean the difference between a good Knick team and a very good Knick team.

by Vincent C on Jul 28, 2010 12:25 PM EDT

Take a second and think back when we first got Randolph, think about the expectations we originally had for him and all of the sheer awesomeness that he could bring to this team... Now after seeing what the team is capable of without him, take his previous awesomeness and add it on top of the awesomeness we already have and what do you get? Infinite awesomeness is what you get!

Lately Amare Stoudemire has been tearing Centers a new one and if It aint broke don't fix it right? If you aren't too pleased with the thought of starting Mozzy at Center again try this out. Randolph can start at Power Forward and lend a big body and long arms for our rebounding issues. Chandler can't go up against rebounding 4's. Guys like Kevin Love and Carlos Boozer have field days cleaning the glass against Chandler, Randolph could at least frustrate those type of guys with some resistance. Besides, I always liked Chandler as a 6th man anyway.

The only bad I see coming out of this is Randolph continuing to be as dumb as your laziest cat and hurting his stock which would make trading him much more difficult. The good certainly outweighs the bad however and if Randolph can become his old self again is it safe to say we'd be unstoppable?

So is trading/dropping+adding players necessary for the starting Power Forward position? Is Anthony Randolph the answer?

 

129332798590462_medium_medium

Just like Shawne Williams, just like Bill Walker, just like Darko Milicic, hell even like J.J. Redick; hidden talents emerge off of benches every year. Whether they've been fermenting on the bench of the same team they eventually shine for or are traded away and shine elsewhere the fact remains the same. Just because a player isn't logging any minutes doesn't mean he's completely useless. Hell, I'm sure even Adam Morrison has something to bring to the table for certain teams. Rings don't lie do they?? He could be a good luck charm maybe? Ok he's hopeless.

We have ballers on our bench turning into prunes and raisins, just drying away. Have you looked at Shawne Williams lately? The kid is in his twenties and looks like he's been through world wars; we got him just in time. We have to test these guys while we still can because sooner or later it'll be too late.

I'm not saying give them all a shot during live action in the middle of the game, but what I am proposing is that we take a long hard look at what we already have and make sure our holes are as big as we originally imagined... Wow

Poll
I Have Faith In...
Rautins
20 votes
Mozgov
25 votes
Randolph
38 votes
None of them
22 votes
All of them
20 votes
Two of them
52 votes

177 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 47 comments  |  5 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

mozzie gets it as he has shown some skill in his time just got shit stuck in to his head.

once he calms down and lets the game come to him, he’s going to improve a great deal.

Victory goes to the courageous!!

by PTfromRP on Dec 25, 2010 10:43 PM EST reply actions  

D'Antoni admitted throwing him to the wolves right away was a miscalculation

Mozgov has potential as long as he can learn and better understand the nuances of the NBA game. I think a lot of his dropped passes were due to him just not being used to the speed at which the Knicks and the rest of the NBA play. What’s Russian for jitters?

As for the other guys, I think Randolph is the only one with a real chance of cracking the rotation this year. Mason and Curry are nonentities, and Azubuike will apparently take all season to fully recover from his knee injury. I don’t think Rautins is athletic enough to play in the NBA.. he’d do well in some European league.

by 100% dundee on Dec 25, 2010 11:29 PM EST up reply actions  

actually andy can go to an asian league or the aussie league and do well.

the main beef if he plays here is that here in the philippines we have right now in our pro league a height limit. or maybe just ball in japan like mahmound abdul rauf/ chris jackson.

Victory goes to the courageous!!

by PTfromRP on Dec 26, 2010 12:15 AM EST up reply actions  

If Randolph can get a clue

he will be the ideal PF if we’re going to continue playing Stat at center. We need more minutes for someone who can clean glass to the tune of 11 per 36 without slowing the whole operation down. Is there a shock collar available for those eighteen foot jump shots with 14+ seconds on the clock?

Free Randolph.

by flossy on Dec 25, 2010 11:41 PM EST reply actions  

Yeah. I don't want to call the guy stupid, but..

If he truly believes that’s the best shot his team can get during that possession, he needs to quit the game.

by Osborn on Dec 26, 2010 9:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Well in his defense

Before this season, through 96 games he was scoring about as efficiently as (also pre-this season) Wilson Chandler. Which was not great, but not “omg kill yourself” terrible like his .286 eFG% with the Knicks.

Free Randolph.

by flossy on Dec 26, 2010 10:17 PM EST up reply actions  

i like this post

certainly think it’s worth seeing what we have in some of the players not currently playing. they’re all young and in randolph’s case it may well be that trading him now would be trading him when his value is a lot lower that it could be.

by patrickm23 on Dec 26, 2010 6:05 AM EST reply actions  

At this point of any one of these guys can become a regular rotation player like TD, Turiaf and Poop

have done, we’ll be golden. I’ve heard good things about Rautins playing PG in practice, Randolph wants to play but is walking the team line and I think there’s a reason you see Mozgov in on every single huddle during timeouts along with the 5 on the court.

Williams pooped his way into the lineup based on how he was playing in practice. I think Rautins might be the next one to break through. He’s just taking longer cuz the PG position under Pringles is one of the most demanding spots in basketball.

Last night, a comedian died in New York. Somebody knows why. Somebody knows

by Rorschach44 on Dec 26, 2010 10:10 AM EST reply actions  

good post

i have faith in rautins and randolph. rautins has ridicolous range, imagine him running the pnr with STAT. everyone would have to step up on him. he would be like a mini nash

by twiddledum on Dec 26, 2010 10:13 AM EST reply actions  

Quality Post with Great Reasoning!!!

I voted two (Moz & Ant) but would like to see what Andy can do also. You never know we might have a Reddick or Ric Brunson on that bench but we will never know til we see him.

Dear Santa, I would like another superstar(Melo) and a new Head Coach who teaches and practices Defense and knows how to use a bench for Christmas. PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!!

by J-BooGie on Dec 26, 2010 1:23 PM EST reply actions  

i voted for rautins only...

at least as a “keeper”. i see rautins as a nash"ish" type talent eventually (and i think d’antoni does too). he’s an above average shooter with good handle and evolving passing ability and vision, and good size and defensive instincts.

regarding utility for this year, i see both mozgov and AR as good trade bait. and between the 2, i’d keep mozgov because of his length and size.

if i had to choose between AR being more useful as trade bait or useful as a rotation player… i’d ship him off. our current talent is good enough where i’d rather use him to bring in someone who is a better fit (ie. backup PG or legit PF/C).

if we weren’t playing so well with our current rotation guys, i might be more patient with AR, but being that it seems like we’re pushing the elite teams better than we hoped, i say let’s not wait and let’s turn him into an actual supplement to our main men.

rautins is a great 12th-15th guy where he can learn and be around the system and NBA talent.

by bucketsncents on Dec 26, 2010 5:10 PM EST reply actions  

Knick knack

Rautins to the D league where he can get some minutes and maybe develop a Pro game. Go out and sign Earl Baron for another try he delivered in his short stint last year. Buike will never play for the Knicks his injury is still in rehab stages. Radolph should be in the rotation to spell one of the bigs. He can run and if pushed he can be a bigger version of Landry fields. His problem is he gets too excited and looks for the home-run too much. Give him a another chance to impress with coaches conditions of course that would dictate his minutes or back to the bench. He still is a talented kid and still needs to learn! I don’t think he is a turn-over waiting to happen and that his basketball IQ is nill! Besides the 7 player rotation is going to kill the starters

by Diverse1 on Dec 26, 2010 9:47 PM EST reply actions  

I was sure this was Dizzy writing for some reason

Donnie's bout to beat the NBA game like he got a cheat code

by Kupe on Dec 26, 2010 9:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Rautins needs confidence

Andy looks like a deer in headlights. I loved the pick but i needed to say he lacks confidence, his handle is suspect, he can’t create his own shot and for others on a consistent basis. He is a poor mans JJ Redick and he needs time to develop. D league is not a bad place to hone your skills. He’s not point guard by the way but he can become a spot point guard for the knicks maybe next year. Do the kid a favor and send him down for this year.

I also need to mention he can’t play Defense either!

by Diverse1 on Dec 26, 2010 10:08 PM EST reply actions  

Have any of you guys seen the Knicks practice highlights?

AR, Mozzie and Rautins look like they are starters!

Of course it is only highlights…

Landry Fields for ROY

by raed247 on Dec 27, 2010 10:40 AM EST reply actions  

It's not the highlights you produce

It’s the lowlights you don’t produce.

by fuhry on Dec 27, 2010 2:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Here is Dizzy!

Chandler belongs at the STARTING THREE.
Why?
Dah, is our best defender of the three spot and will score more from the three spot to relieve Stoudemire and Felton.
Chandler playing the four is a defensive mistmatch that will tire him out watching bigger guys.
Stoudemire belongs at the STARTING FOUR.
Why?
Because when he plays center it takes away from his game on the physical end of it and wil tire you out as time goes on.
Especially against natural big guy centers.
Yes, mistmatches is what you look for to win.
But remember you have to have the guys in the positions to dominate and go after the mismatch to win.
D’Antoni and Gallinari are the problem and cannot accept making him (Gallinari) as a
second unit PF/SF. That to will make him Gallinari a asset off the bench instead of starting.
Walsh should have the balls and brains to call D’Antoni out on this ASAP for the better of the team.
MikeThe Intern keep up the good work.
Kupe this is Dizzy and not MikeTheIntern.

by Dziedzic on Dec 27, 2010 10:41 AM EST reply actions  

Dude what did this have to do with any of the players Mike was talking about?

This gimmick posting is making me wonder if Gallo dated your sister once or something.

by GAx on Dec 27, 2010 1:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Haha, mistmatches

sounds like a pathetic water balloon fight…and your lineups don’t sound terrible, Gallo off the bench may not be bad except that we DONT have a quality starting center until Mozgov develops the skills needed to be one, or we get one thru a trade

Donnie's bout to beat the NBA game like he got a cheat code

by Kupe on Dec 27, 2010 3:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Really wondering about Andy

Like, what is the plan if god forbid Ray gets hurt? It can’t be DWTDD. Hahn said RMJ runs the backup point in practice. Just a second while I go vomit up lunch….. there, that’s better.

Seriously, why isn’t Andy in the D League? Or getting burn in a blow-out?? It’s not like he’s an emergency backup for Ray; against Chi, he didn’t even dress. Maybe we should start a Top 10 Hypothetical Reasons the Knicks Won’t Develop Andy Rautins thread. That would be fun.

Why didn’t Hahn ask that ONE TIME while MDA was explaining the PnR?

It’s the lone worry point in an otherwise wonderful Knicks season….

by AtlKnicksFan on Dec 27, 2010 7:22 PM EST reply actions  

You should watch the Dantoni Show on MSG if you can.

The viewer-submitted email questions are actually for the most part really good and ask a lot of the stuff fans in the knicks blogosphere lose their minds about. This is one of them and when asked why Rautins wasn’t sent to the D-League was that he doesn’t really like sending players down to another system even if they get PT down there since he likes to inculcate his system into them during practice, and would rather keep them around the team and the system for development than throwing some rookie to the D-league affiliate we share with NJ to get some reps in.

And how many blowouts have we had?

by GAx on Dec 28, 2010 1:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Totally didn't see this when I wrote my comment below.

I guess I hit the nail on the head sort of. He wants to hold on to Rautins to mold him into the player he wants him to be and not how some D-League coach wants him to be. Spot on.

"Dedication To The Don" Most Popular Post Of All Time On P&T. I Am Honored

by MikeTheIntern on Dec 28, 2010 1:23 PM EST up reply actions  

Btw, Mike I never asked, after that inaugural intro post of yours, but John Gabriel was hired like 3 years ago expressly to come up with a good way to get LeBron, wasn't he?

How come I heard over the summer it was compiled by some other people, and that it was still pretty shitty? Not that I care at all at this point since the water under the bridge is in the freaking Atlantic by now, but was just curious. I’ve been meaning to ask for like months but keep forgetting.

by GAx on Dec 28, 2010 1:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Gabriel came in as our new director of scouting and helped Walsh clear cap space and go after certain players to maintain cap space for 2010's free agency.

Ironically he advised Walsh to go after T-mac just as he himself did back in the day when he brought T-mac to Orlando during his GM days there. I’m not completely sure if he was brought in to persuade Lebron to come here or to just give Walsh good ideas of whom to go after while maintaining cap like he did but I would imagine that no one were expecting the charade known as the “Lebron Sweepstakes.” All plans were pretty much thrown out the window at that point and became in to a who can impress him more high school contest. So if part of his hiring was to entice Lebron with the way he did T-mac and Grant Hill in Orlando it became worthless and we turned to Tony Soprano instead…

"Dedication To The Don" Most Popular Post Of All Time On P&T. I Am Honored

by MikeTheIntern on Dec 28, 2010 2:19 PM EST up reply actions  

I guess we can thank Maverick Carter for that one

And I also guess this is as good a place and time as any to post Lebron’s official business presentation he’s sending out to sponsors to get them interested in giving him money.

http://www.businessinsider.com/heres-the-presentation-lebron-james-used-to-get-sponsors-for-his-birthday-party-2010-12#-1

Yes, this is the sort of “professional” shit his team comes up with. Man, if this guy wasn’t a ridiculous ball player…

by GAx on Dec 28, 2010 2:29 PM EST up reply actions  

swag bags? shit i bottle mine

Donnie's bout to beat the NBA game like he got a cheat code

by Kupe on Dec 28, 2010 5:01 PM EST up reply actions  

Lol

I wonder what he puts in the swag bags…

"Dedication To The Don" Most Popular Post Of All Time On P&T. I Am Honored

by MikeTheIntern on Dec 28, 2010 5:24 PM EST up reply actions  

maybe this makes sense

with Rautins, but Mozgov is clearly a confidence issue. Send him down and let Randolph be our insurance till he gets back

by Bigknickle on Dec 28, 2010 2:00 PM EST up reply actions  

ahhhh okay, that one up top was just confusing.

But I’d also like to keep Mozgov here. I don’t want him in the D-league to bolster his confidence against puppy scraps where the Terence Williams of the league average a triple double. Doing well against lesser competition and then coming up and falling against the best in the world might shatter his confidence even more.

Basically exactly what happened this summer with the World’s and then NBA in the fall.

by GAx on Dec 28, 2010 2:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Like to pick up Earl Barron

He did good for us last year, during his 7 game stay. He was able to put up 11.5 pts along with 11 boards a game, high energy guy who held his own against some of the better bigs he played against. Barron becomes our starting center, Amare slides over to the PF spot, Gallo stays at the 3, and Chandler once again becomes the first man off the bench. Chandler can the come in for Gallo or Amare, or even Fields depend on what is needed. This picking up of Barron, makes us a deeper team, with more options off the bench. Still have Tony D backing up the guard spots, Turiaf backing up Barron, and Williams coming off the bench for more scoring options. Seems like a no brainer pick to me!

by rjv3 on Dec 27, 2010 8:53 PM EST reply actions  

Good thoughts, Mike

Some of your comments have become a bit cynical recently, nice to have you back, lol.

As for our guys, I’m with you. While trade opportunities should never be ignored, I think it is more than fair to question how badly we need to make a trade. It’s no secret that the Knicks have a couple of project players in Mozgov and Rautins. Rautins looks strikenly like Redick in that it has taken Redick a couple years to really adjust his shooting stroke to the NBA length. He was lights out in college and it didn’t translate much his 1st 2 years in the NBA. So he just worked and did what he could. I think Rautins is going to progress that same way, although I beleive he is a better playmaker than Redick. Thing is, it’s just gonna take time and practice.

I used to think it was about game-time and game-experience that helped guys develop doe D’Antoni. While it surely helps, I think the real development is in practice and with the asistant coaches. We don’t get to see how the practicies go and we don’t get the video highlights like regular games. Somehow we still pretend we know what goes on though. All of the guys you mentioned, Randolph, Rautins, Mozgov… those guys well get some rotation minutes soon enough. Most accounts seem to point to hard work from them and Pringles does seem to reward that eventually. Thing is, we ARE trying to win games now and not just later.

Given our decade of shitty years, we (as fans) have gotten used to caring about tomorrow versus today and we sort of clamor a bit to see young guys develop. Seems we have some adjusting to do ourselves…

"Madison Square Garden is the ultimate basketball stage. That's where I belong. That's where I live. That's the home of the New York Knicks." - Amar'e Stoudemire

by Chris Child's Fist on Dec 28, 2010 11:49 AM EST reply actions  

not to compare white to white...

but i’m still convinced MDA sees nash in rautins… more than redick type skills, and maybe with better size. rautins is deceptively quick, with good and developing handle and court vision, and can already shoot. i remember a bunch of slick passes in summer league

and running the offense in practice might be exactly what he needs, instead of running some other offense on some d-league team.

i like andy and would love to keep him

by bucketsncents on Dec 28, 2010 12:19 PM EST up reply actions  

I think D'Antoni knows he'll be playing Rautins eventually.

He’s molding him into the backup Point Guard that he wants Rautins to be. I wont say he’s a Nash type because it’s a bit early to say that but if he could be a Dragic that would be more than enough.

As I said I think MDA knows eventually he’s going to play Rautins which would explain why he hasn’t been sent to the D-League. I think MDA wants to keep his eye on Rautins and progress his skills in a way that he wants and not how some D-League coach wants. When he thinks Andy is ready to go to war he’ll put him on the floor and see where it goes.

I get the feeling it’ll be sooner rather than later and Rautins will be the final strand that determines if we need to trade for a backup point before the trade deadline or not. If he works the position well the need for another point will die down, if not, Donnie would probably try to pull a trade for an expiring one.

"Dedication To The Don" Most Popular Post Of All Time On P&T. I Am Honored

by MikeTheIntern on Dec 28, 2010 1:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, and just for an analogy of sorts...

Memphis wanted to convert OJ Mayo into a backup PG as well. However, they elected to go about it by throwing him in the mix during Summer League and sort of rush it.

Didn’t work so well, and they seemingly have abandoned it. I’m glad D’Antoni isn’t rushing this one. Or he doesn’t seem to be, at least.

"Madison Square Garden is the ultimate basketball stage. That's where I belong. That's where I live. That's the home of the New York Knicks." - Amar'e Stoudemire

by Chris Child's Fist on Dec 28, 2010 1:55 PM EST up reply actions  

I just dont put Rautins' ceiling nearly that high

We are talkin one of the purest PGs ever and a 2 time MVP.

Rautins is a SG who may be able to handle PG duties. I just try to avoid comparisons that simple. The guys are both Canadian and both can shoot well. But I think that is where their similarities end.

"Madison Square Garden is the ultimate basketball stage. That's where I belong. That's where I live. That's the home of the New York Knicks." - Amar'e Stoudemire

by Chris Child's Fist on Dec 28, 2010 1:47 PM EST up reply actions  

i said nash"ish"...

easy guys, i’m not saying he’s nash incarnate… i’m saying he’s got the makings of similar skill sets. nash wasn’t nash in dallas… nash BECAME nash over time and in MDA’s system.

none of us have seen that much of him, but in the summer league, he looked like he definitely could become a PG. the kids got moxie and skill.

i don’t think he’ll make it in the league as a starting 2 guard, but if he evolves as a 1 and keeps his outside shot, than he’s got a good chance at getting regular run.

yeah, and he’s canadian.

by bucketsncents on Dec 28, 2010 3:18 PM EST reply actions  

I voted 2. I’m not sure of the two, but I feel that two will become contributors and that should be enough to mitigate the current DIRE need for help at those positions. That’s of course considering that the current need is about preserving the current level of play (e.g. preventing Felton and Amare from burning out) and slowly improving from there, rather than taking “the next step”.

Mozgov is to me the most likely to contribute this season in a way such as to alleviate the immediate need for another big body. Obviously he showed enough to get the big nod to start the season. He has all the physical tools and seems to have pretty good instincts actually. He just needs to get used to the NBA level to let his current abilities contribute, and let the coaches hone the rest of his game over time. I think we’ll be seeing him in the rotation within the month.,

If Rautins is the high IQ player he seems to be (because he’s a coach’s son, or because he’s a slow-footed white player? you decide), I think he has a very decent shot of providing decent back-up minutes, especially with DWTDD there to mix things up. If they are indeed looking at him to play back-up PG, it’s going to take some time before he’s really ready for it.

Randolph’s problems are obvious and it’s hard to say if he’ll ever overcome them. If he has it in him to practice and study hard until he can learn the system correctly, then quite obviously he can be a difference maker for this roster. If it happens, though, I think we’re looking at the end of the season or more likely next. He seems like a slow learner due to his late basketball start and perhaps natural inclinations.

by paxon on Dec 30, 2010 2:50 PM EST reply actions  

The only two guys I have confidence in are Mozgov and Rautins. Anytime Dantoni has put Randolph on the floor, he always manages to look like a deer caught in headlights. He never seems to be where he’s supposed to be, and he always looks confused. He’s made a couple of shots but he doesn’t look organized. He cannot help this team at the moment. I wasn’t overly impressed with Rautins but I think he’s a better player than what we saw in Summer League. He was missing 3’s that he probably usually makes. I can see him being a better defender that offensive player. Mozgov was surprising simply because we only had the short clip of his dunks and exploits to introduce us to him. I was surprised at his agility for a big man. Lately he’s demonstrating that he’s really not seeing the ball. He’s anxious to do something before he even gets it. The fumbling’s not cute but can be worked on. He can get better defensively also. He’s working on that. I think he needs to get more playing time. Why do we have a 7-footer if we’re not gonna use him.

by Deniece Thomas on Jan 4, 2011 7:15 PM EST reply actions  

agree about Randolph

but I wouldn’t let his lack of performance here define who he is as a player. If he’s in the right situation and has the time support and leeway to develop, I think he’ll be something special. His time will come…I dunno if it’ll be here but that’s a different matter.

What did the 5 fingers say to the face?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7CBwX1891A
HaHaHaHa!

by Lord Smackington on Jan 5, 2011 11:19 AM EST up reply actions  

Nice read in Newsday today, and

I think holds the key to AR being the player he can be:
“You have to find players that are willing to fulfill roles,” Popovich said, “and you have to know what roles you need to have filled to go around your star players.”

AR needs to understand and execute his role on the team, everything else will come with it thereafter cuz he definately has the wow factor in his genes.

LINK HERE

by screamedia on Jan 5, 2011 12:10 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Posting and Toasting: Blogging the Knicks Robin Hood-Style Since 2007

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Jorts6_small
Next Season's Roster and the Cap and the Tax
Jorts6_small
Game 6 Optimism Thread!
Cheating_spartans_small
The Knicks as the Avengers (Spoiler Alert)
Mets_knicks_small
baked thoughts - game 4
Dscn0215_small
Machu Picchu

Recent FanPosts

Small
Ridiculous Knicks Trade proposals Pt. 1
Sterling_archer_small
Knicks' Second Round Draft Pick Discussion Thread
Small
What would it take to get Rick Carlisle to coach the Knicks?
Small
If NBAPA wins "The Linsanity Rule" Arbitration... Who do we want in addition to Lin? Nash? Dragon?
Small
Player Grades for 2012
Small
NBA Scout On Vassilis Spanoulis And Georgios Printezis
Small
Knicks Players NBA 2K12 ratings
Nba_g_starks01_576_small
State Your Case for the NBA Finals
Ed-in-chief_small
A whole lotta nonsense
Small
Parody is as parody does.

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >