Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Knicks Beat Lakers With Familiar Strategy

Woj/Spears: Knicks Nearing McGrady Deal

From Yahoo! Sports:

The New York Knicks are getting closer to reaching the Houston Rockets’ demands for Tracy McGrady and his $23 million expiring contract, league sources told Yahoo! Sports.

The Knicks and Rockets have designed the framework of a deal that would unload New York’s Jared Jeffries, Jordan Hill and either Al Harrington or Larry Hughes for McGrady, Joey Dorsey and Brian Cook.

As talks stood on Monday, the price of dumping the burdensome contract of Jeffries – who is owed $6.9 million next season – comes with the Knicks and Rockets exchanging 2011 first-round picks and the Knicks’ 2012 first-round choice going to Houston. New York also might include a 2010 second-round pick.

Moving Jeffries= Yay. Dumping Hill and coughing up first-round picks= BOO. Big time. More on this as it comes.

Comment 358 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

No Way

Donnie does it again. This guy…

"But when he saw it, he just put his hands up and they couldn’t give it to him. It just fell to the ground, I-I don’t, you know … So, that showed me he had great experience..." - Jeff Van Gundy

by Anthony Bonner's Subpoena on Feb 15, 2010 5:29 PM EST reply actions  

No Jinx

"But when he saw it, he just put his hands up and they couldn’t give it to him. It just fell to the ground, I-I don’t, you know … So, that showed me he had great experience..." - Jeff Van Gundy

by Anthony Bonner's Subpoena on Feb 15, 2010 5:29 PM EST up reply actions  

Hm

I don’t see how they can exchange 2011 first round picks because the Knicks can’t trade theirs since they traded their 2010 pick.

It comes down to giving up Hill in order to clear Jeffries. I really don’t like giving up that 2012 first rounder though. At some point you have to gamble though. We’ll see.

by fuhry on Feb 15, 2010 5:30 PM EST reply actions  

exactly this

the move is definitely a gamble – Donnie is essentially saying that he’s landing 2 stars this summer, and that the team will be in the title hunt. if this is true, then the picks are relatively worthless and Hill won’t get much playing time anyway.

of course, if the free agents go somewhere else…this deal cripples our future yet again. as The Who told us at the Super Bowl: meet the new boss, same as the old boss.

i really hate the move. i’m all about gambling, but this just screams “negative expected value” to me.

by latrell chokewell on Feb 15, 2010 5:41 PM EST up reply actions  

If you remember when Isiah traded the ‘06 1st rounder for Eddy Curry, he had the 1st rounders exchanged in 2007, so I guess because the Knicks don’t lose a 1st rounder, it’s allowed.

by The Cycle on Feb 15, 2010 5:57 PM EST up reply actions  

Curry trade

The trade for Eddy Curry was a total disaster for which the Knicks are still paying dearly. Thanks Isaih.

by Vincent C on Feb 16, 2010 12:06 PM EST up reply actions  

I was just about to post this - I understand clearing cap space and all

but I thought the ‘throwing away our future for untested talent’ era was fucking DONE. I mean, I’m not Hill’s biggest fans but 3 picks for the next three years just to get rid of Jefferies contract so we can lure who, exactly?

Amare – Going to get traded and possibly sign an extension.
LBJ – Probably going to sign an extension, especially if Jamison or Amare join him.
Wade – Either stays in Miami or goes back home to Chi-town.
Bosh – Not a franchise player, hell, not even that much of an upgrade over Lee imo.

What’s the point of just throwing away our future like this on a hunch? Unless Donnie knows something we don’t, this looks like a stupid desperation move.

by Stargazey on Feb 15, 2010 5:39 PM EST reply actions  

On the plus side.

getting rid of Jeffries opens up enough space so that they can offer a max contract without renouncing Lee’s Bird rights. That means if they can sign Wade or HWMNBN or even Joe Johnson, they can then sign Lee and go over the cap doing it. Plus if McGrady can still play, it’s a bonus.

Plus – outside chance, depending on the cap, that they can offer two max contracts…..

If they can’t sign any of those guys they can still get under the cap, I think, in 2011. Giving up Hill is an acceptable risk – I would be surprised if he ended up being a superstar, and though I do think he’ll be a good power forward, that’s not too tough to find.

Hate giving them any first round pick whatsoever, though.

by fuhry on Feb 15, 2010 5:49 PM EST up reply actions  

explain

Can you explain everything you know regarding Lee and the Bird Rights rules… i dont know much about it

by Frank E on Feb 15, 2010 7:00 PM EST up reply actions  

I believe

Lee’s cap hold is $10.5 million – that means that to retain his Bird Rights that money will count against the salary cap even if he remains unsigned (once he is signed whatever his contract is would be his cap number). So that money counts against the cap, but then we can sign other players to amounts up until the cap number, and then afterwards sign Lee to a contract for more than $10.5 million, even if it takes us over the cap, because that’s what Bird Rights allow you to do.

by Mount17 on Feb 15, 2010 7:06 PM EST up reply actions  

ok

So basically, if Lee remains unsigned for a period of time, we’d still have enough money to max someone out. (I dont think Lee’s worth 10.5)

by Frank E on Feb 15, 2010 7:10 PM EST up reply actions  

Even if we would give Lee

the max he can get (which I don’t think is more than 13.4, maybe less) we could still afford a max if Hill and Jeffries were gone, but it would allow us to sign another player to fill out the roster using the extra money.

by Mount17 on Feb 15, 2010 7:20 PM EST up reply actions  

just one player?

or the whole roster? also whats the situation with tmac. If we sign Lee and are over the cap, can we resign him if we go over? What if we dont sign Lee?

by Frank E on Feb 15, 2010 7:21 PM EST up reply actions  

A cap hold

eats into your cap space. T-Mac’s hold would be huge so we would undoubtedly renounce him and then lose his Bird Rights. If we don’t sign Lee then we would have a lot of money to spend, but probably not enough to sign two max players (see a comment of mine below).

by Mount17 on Feb 15, 2010 7:25 PM EST up reply actions  

tmac

He loses his bird rights by being traded. You have to spend 3 years with the team to have Bird rights

by Frank E on Feb 15, 2010 7:26 PM EST up reply actions  

nevermind... this is what i found on it

[edit] Larry Bird exception
Perhaps the most well-known of the NBA’s salary cap exceptions, it is so named because the Boston Celtics were the first team permitted to exceed the salary cap to re-sign one of their own players (in that case, Larry Bird). Free agents who qualify for this exception are called “qualifying veteran free agents” or “Bird Free Agents” in the CBA, and this exception falls under the auspices of the Veteran Free Agent exception. In essence, the Larry Bird exception allows teams to exceed the salary cap to re-sign their own free agents, at an amount up to the maximum salary. To qualify as a Bird free agent, a player must have played three seasons without being waived or changing teams as a free agent. This means a player can obtain “Bird rights” by playing under three one-year contracts, a single contract of at least three years, or any combination thereof. It also means that when a player is traded, his Bird rights are traded with him, and his new team can use the Bird exception to re-sign him. Bird-exception contracts can be up to six years in length.

Based on that, I dont understand why we cant resign Lee and go over the cap. For example say we have 30 Mil to spend. Why cant we spend that 30mil on outside free agents in addition to resigning Lee?

by Frank E on Feb 15, 2010 7:30 PM EST up reply actions  

Because the cap hold

was created specifically so we can’t do that. Bird Rights were created so teams won’t have to be broken up, like can happen in the NFL, not so that teams could load up before signing their own free agents.

by Mount17 on Feb 15, 2010 7:58 PM EST up reply actions  

i got it now

but what makes the hold go from his contract of 7mil to 10.5?

by Frank E on Feb 15, 2010 8:45 PM EST up reply actions  

His cap number this year is

$7 million, and his cap hold is 150% of that. For smaller contracts it would be an even bigger percentage.

by Mount17 on Feb 15, 2010 8:58 PM EST up reply actions  

1 more thing

can the knicks renounce the bird rights, or does lee have to do it?

by Frank E on Feb 15, 2010 9:15 PM EST up reply actions  

It's the Knicks' choice

Of course, if Lee goes and signs with someone else it’s all moot.

by Mount17 on Feb 15, 2010 9:19 PM EST up reply actions  

thats good

So if we have a good situation on our hands than Lees 10.5 wont be holding us back

by Frank E on Feb 15, 2010 9:23 PM EST up reply actions  

Don't like it

If it turns out we need the space in the summer (for example, if Lebron is more than just a tease but won’t come alone) then he can use Hill, picks, or Chandler to dump Jeffries then. To do it now and then end up with Johnson and Boozer, or perhaps less, seems a little panicky and shortsighted.

by Mount17 on Feb 15, 2010 5:47 PM EST reply actions  

No offense guys

But us Rocket’s fan’s love this deal.

by mob16151 on Feb 15, 2010 5:49 PM EST up reply actions  

I think that

it will be a game of chicken here. The rockets probably aren’t going to get a better deal – but they don’t HAVE to do a deal at all. I predict it’s the 1st round pick discussion which will hold things up to see who cracks first.

by fuhry on Feb 15, 2010 5:51 PM EST up reply actions  

yes the deal is almost too in favor of us.

walsh must be reloading lots of money to unleash it on someone in the free agent lottery. thanks for the picks and jordan hill :D

Rockets>>>>>>Jazz
Texans>>>>>>>Titans
Super Mario>>>>>>>Vince Young

by Rockets 4 Life on Feb 15, 2010 6:31 PM EST up reply actions  

Well, from our perspective.....

WOOHOO. Even if you guys gets Lebron or a few max agents and become a good team, it’s not really a big concern for us as Morey is a brilliant drafter (Aaron Brooks and Carl Landry were both extremely late first round picks, after all.) And if you don’t, all the better. Hill I’ll admit I don’t know much about (I wanted Gallinari very badly, though I understand you guys don’t want to give him up) but he’ll be serviceable, Harrington is nice (heck, even Hughes might be okay given our massive woes at shooting guard) and while taking Jeffries is bleh, he is a serviceable player.
And since I don’t really watch you guys: how is Jordan Hill? Good/bad/whatever?

Minnesotan Rockets fan

by Barragan on Feb 15, 2010 5:49 PM EST reply actions  

To be completely honest

JJ might be the best (right now) player you’re getting. Al Harrington and Larry Hughes will destroy your offense and JHill needs some major minutes in the D-League.

by Stargazey on Feb 15, 2010 5:51 PM EST up reply actions  

The reasons the Rockets like this deal is as follows

We get either Harrington or Hughes who bring some firepower to our bench which is something we’ve lacked somewhat this year. We get rid of Dorsey and T-Mac who have contributed nothing. Jordan Hill can take the time to develop in our system because for at least this season we have Landry,and Scola in front of him. Jeffries contract sucks but he’s another tough defender in that Battier type mold(obviously he’s not as good a defender as Battier but he’s probably a better rebounder) And the option to switch draft picks in 2011 and get one in 2012 is great for us because Morey really is a very good GM when it comes to drafting.

by mob16151 on Feb 15, 2010 5:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Thanks for posting your perspective

If you get our 2012 pick it’s highway robbery, I tells ya.

by fuhry on Feb 15, 2010 6:07 PM EST up reply actions  

we love that walsh is giving it to us.

Rockets>>>>>>Jazz
Texans>>>>>>>Titans
Super Mario>>>>>>>Vince Young

by Rockets 4 Life on Feb 15, 2010 6:32 PM EST up reply actions  

dorsey has yet to contribute.

he has only gotten playing time for 2 games this year. of course the game in memphis was incredible. to you knicks fans: i think you may like joey dorsey. the guy can rebound like dwight howard (hell hes almost as strong as dwight) and gives the team a lot of energy.

Rockets>>>>>>Jazz
Texans>>>>>>>Titans
Super Mario>>>>>>>Vince Young

by Rockets 4 Life on Feb 15, 2010 6:34 PM EST up reply actions  

Dorsey contributed nothing?

Mr. All-Star Dorsey? Dorsey is going to be a beast when he finally gets the time he deserves. I don’t understand why Adleman hasn’t played him at all this season, though I’m also not privy to practices so I don’t know what goes on in there.

Dorsey, in my mind, is someone we should not include at all. His defense is incredible, and while he should stay far, far away from shooting anything more than a glance at the basket Houston desperately needs more defense, the kind of D Dorsey provides.

Oh well, at least Cook will go away. F**k Cook. If he’s ever in the game, it’s pretty much over. That’s why he gets trash time, and not very much.

by jasonmicron on Feb 16, 2010 12:31 PM EST up reply actions  

Dorsey hasn't proven anything

the guy is 26 and has only played 9 games. If he can’t crack the Rockets’ rotation why is he anything more than a scrub? Even Jordan Hill whom D’Antoni rarely ever plays has appeared in more games and contributed more than this guy.

by secret defense on Feb 16, 2010 8:54 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't know...

Harrington is actually very skilled and extremely quick for a guy who’s 6’9". But he’s not a playmaker – get him the ball and he can drive on anyone and get you a bucket. Defensively, kind of average, and not a great rebounder. Fair three point shooter.

Hughes is a good player but he thinks he’s a better shooter than he is, and he’s sulky when his coach doesn’t agree that he’s awesome, which is pretty much always. In the right situation he could contribute but you have to live with bad shots.

Hill has not gotten much of a chance to play – he’s active and can shoot – but he lacks NBA saavy right now. He probably will improve to be a pretty good player and maybe might be able to play the 5 in this league…. but at this point he’s not looking like a great pick at 8.

Jeffries is a good guy but he can’t shoot or do anything in traffic. He can guard 1-5 and apparently talks well on defense. But he’s basically got no offensive skills on the floor and he’s only an average rebounder. He hustles though.

by fuhry on Feb 15, 2010 5:57 PM EST up reply actions  

Why not wait

until Rockets waive McGrady and get him then.
Just to get rid of Jeffries? 2 first rounders are too steep of a price IMHO.
Who are the other 2 guys? Any inside?

by YIK on Feb 15, 2010 5:54 PM EST reply actions  

Hopefully it's Hughes

I think that would mean we’d still be in the running for Tyrus Thomas…

However, losing future picks does sound depressing. Hopefully Walsh has something up his sleeve?? (super scared face)

Looking for in-depth basketball analysis? Try http://www.basketballfreeforall.com!

by RedHopeful on Feb 15, 2010 5:59 PM EST reply actions  

I don't know about Thomas

I think he’s an attitude problem.

by fuhry on Feb 15, 2010 6:15 PM EST up reply actions  

He's questionable

but he’s been made to look A LOT worse than it ever should have. Chicago has had a multitude of tough coaches who don’t work well with young guys. Skiles got the ball rolling and then the interim coach (can’t remember the name) kept it going. Vinne Del Negro – same thing. Look at how he treated Noah last year (and supposedly Noah got upset quite a bit too).

I’ve got faith that a change of scenery is mostly what TT needs.

Looking for in-depth basketball analysis? Try http://www.basketballfreeforall.com!

by RedHopeful on Feb 15, 2010 6:47 PM EST up reply actions  

second worse deal in knicks history

no way should we give them two first round picks for mcgrady, there is absolutely no reason too. so what if we keep losing this year, at least we would still have our picks. look at the negatives: we dont get any major free agents, we dont get in higher in the playoffs then 6th seed, we return to lame duck basketballl in 2012, our1st rounders turn into lottery picks or the next superstar, mcgrady doesnt help with shit, and houston turns around and gets tryus thomas for harrington and their defense improves for three to four seasons and the knicks again pick later in 1st round in 2011

CHUUUUUUUUUUUUUCH

by IB on Feb 15, 2010 6:10 PM EST reply actions  

I agree

if they can somehow put curry in there instead of jefferies id do the move and get rid of hill if thats what we have to do to get rid of curry.

by H2O 718 on Feb 15, 2010 6:15 PM EST up reply actions  

FIRST OF ALL, YOU SHOULD NOT BE GIVING UP THAT MANY DRAFT PICKS UNLESS YOU’RE INCOMPETANT ISIAH; AND YES MAYYYYYYBE IT’S FATHOMABLE IF IT’S CURRY’S CONTRACT…NO, WAIT, FOR ALL THOSE PICKS…STILL ISN’T

by bbaakk06 on Feb 15, 2010 6:22 PM EST up reply actions  

WHY ARE WE STILL PAYING ISIAH THOMAS??????

by bbaakk06 on Feb 15, 2010 6:13 PM EST reply actions  

WTF IS GOIN ONNNNNNNNNNN

by bbaakk06 on Feb 15, 2010 6:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Hell to the no

I dont like this trade at all. just a horrible deal, no benefits at all except for getting rid of jefferies. I dont know if its worth the gamble with Mcgrady. Id rather keep Hill for at least one more season , as they say big men take longer time to develop. dont like giving up the picks as well.

by H2O 718 on Feb 15, 2010 6:14 PM EST reply actions  

Getting rid of Jeffries

is a pretty huge thing though…

by fuhry on Feb 15, 2010 6:16 PM EST up reply actions  

so

ur telling me ur ok with giving our away our pick of the past years draft and giving them the 2012 pick? this deal is very one sided , houston is getting the better end of the deal. if they cant trade jefferies by the deadline, then we can try to move him in the offseason.

by H2O 718 on Feb 15, 2010 6:24 PM EST up reply actions  

+1

its just too much.

1st round pick (Jordan Hill), exchange picks (2011) and 2012 first round pick?

Didn’t we get rid of the dumb fuck who usually makes these trades?

Bye, AP :(

by FreeBradshaw on Feb 15, 2010 6:43 PM EST up reply actions  

i dont think

DW will give all that away.

I think the 12 pick is too much… But it will be sweet to get rid of JJ. Which MANY considered impossible at the start of the season.

by gbaked on Feb 15, 2010 6:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Agreed

people are really over reacting to some preliminary stuff being thrown out to the public…

Looking for in-depth basketball analysis? Try http://www.basketballfreeforall.com!

by RedHopeful on Feb 15, 2010 6:48 PM EST up reply actions  

You know...

I really don’t even care about the exchanging picks in 2011 and giving them the 2012 1st , cuz if they are what they’re supposed to be…then it won’t matter much.

I think they semi-know what Hill is and its just so ignorant to get rid of him.

I hate that idea.

Bye, AP :(

by FreeBradshaw on Feb 15, 2010 6:49 PM EST up reply actions  

in these situations do the best GM's in the league take advantage of the weaker ones.

like our GM. if walsh does this then he must desperately want money for FA.

Rockets>>>>>>Jazz
Texans>>>>>>>Titans
Super Mario>>>>>>>Vince Young

by Rockets 4 Life on Feb 15, 2010 6:54 PM EST up reply actions  

i think this is a situation

where 2 teams have what the other wants. Its just a matter of working out the details.

clearing JJ without taking any more salary next year is HUGE and something many considered impossible at the end of teha season.

And to get a guy like TMac back, who is prob done… but at least has the skill to be a great player is better then taking back guys like harrington/huges… who are just really bad.

by gbaked on Feb 15, 2010 6:58 PM EST up reply actions  

this is why I dunno if this is going to be the deal.

Walsh is 10x as experienced as Morey. He DOES know what he’s doing and I don’t think he’s screwing himself like this.

Bye, AP :(

by FreeBradshaw on Feb 15, 2010 6:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Yea

Thats clears up like 29 million dollars in cap room for next season. Because McGrady’s expiring and I beleive Cook is as well.

by mob16151 on Feb 16, 2010 2:02 PM EST up reply actions  

that was before Hill was included, because originally the Knicks were only offering Picks, Harrington, Hughes, and Jeffries/Curry.

I like this move alot. It should be noted that the report says “exhanging” 2011 picks, not giving them up. So they would still keep a their 2011 first round pick. so they would only be giving up a future pick, Hill (and of course the contracts of Hughes/Harrington and jefferies). This is the perfect move for the Knicks.

Lebron isn’t going anywhere, with a running mate finally coming to town this trade deadline. Amare is following Wade of LBJ, same with Bosh. Joe Johnson is the only guy who’s a possibility to move, and that might be to Chicago. If the Knicks could grab McGrady, they give themselves the flexibility to hang on to Lee, the financial free done to Max contract someone. and then this time next year, send curry’s expiring contract to someone for a Point guard. solidifying the all of the need positions.

by IceBlade on Feb 15, 2010 6:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Fuck this.

For real? McGrady’s a waste to them…

Do not give up Jordan Hill, Donnie.

Do not fucking do it.

Bye, AP :(

by FreeBradshaw on Feb 15, 2010 6:33 PM EST reply actions  

*waste to the Rockets....

McGrady might help the Knicks

But too…TOO much.

Bye, AP :(

by FreeBradshaw on Feb 15, 2010 6:33 PM EST up reply actions  

just sayin'

joey dorsey can crack the rotation if he is given the opportunity.

by enron4515 on Feb 15, 2010 6:33 PM EST reply actions  

if he can crack ours he can definitely crack the knicks

Rockets>>>>>>Jazz
Texans>>>>>>>Titans
Super Mario>>>>>>>Vince Young

by Rockets 4 Life on Feb 15, 2010 6:35 PM EST up reply actions  

not necessarily

with the Knicks its not skill on the rotation that overwhelms, its that D’Antoni doesn’t like having a rotation of more than 8 players.

by IceBlade on Feb 15, 2010 6:36 PM EST up reply actions  

ok

but if he can make the rotation then its not like the knicks get nothing in return

by enron4515 on Feb 15, 2010 6:41 PM EST up reply actions  

I really..REALLY

hope that McGrady’s got some hidden injury where he can’t pass his physical.

Cuz this deal is IT’esque.

Yes..Jeffires gone.

Everything else is absolutely ignorant.

Bye, AP :(

by FreeBradshaw on Feb 15, 2010 6:36 PM EST reply actions  

BTW

Even if this deal goes through, if the salary cap is at the low end of the projection, we would still need to clear a little more money to be able to fit two maxes.

by Mount17 on Feb 15, 2010 6:40 PM EST reply actions  

To spell it out

The Knicks’ obligations for next year right now are at $27.33 million. Take away Hill and Jeffries and they’re at $17.78 million. At that point they would only have 4 roster spots filled, and the cap holds to get to the required 12 spots would cost around $3.8 million (I’m not sure how it would work once players are signed – once two max guy were signed, a hold shouldn’t be needed for those spots and that can add close to an extra million dollars), bringing the number to $21.58 million. Two max free agents (not using a sign and trade) would cost $33.14 million for the first year, which would bring the cap number to $54.72 million. The NBA has tentatively estimated the cap might fall to anywhere between $50.4 million and $53.6 million.

by Mount17 on Feb 15, 2010 6:57 PM EST up reply actions  

take away the '12 pick

and I think its a good deal.

with the pick… its too much.

by gbaked on Feb 15, 2010 6:41 PM EST reply actions  

Knick trade

This is pure insanity. You want to give Hill up in order to get the Rockets to agree to take Jeffries contract, OK, but forget the draft picks. McGrady is washed up or he would be playing full time for the Rockets.

by VABEARFANAtic on Feb 15, 2010 6:44 PM EST reply actions  

My take on the deal

As many of you witnessed on the T-mac blog last week, I was willing to give up Hill to rid ourselves of Jeffries. However, I hope Walsh really pushes hard to only exchange one draft pick on top of that. Theres really no other takers out there for McGrady, and bluntly, hes not even playing for them right now. They already are getting serviceable players in Harrington/Hughes, Jeffries, and Hill. On top of that I’ll be flexible to exhange one years pick, but not give up an additional pick. I know according to Donnies plan he believes these picks he gives up will be in the 20’s. But some of you are right, you dont know that for SURE. Maybe the whole plan blows up in our face.

On the flipside, this really improves our chances at LeBron. As I said last week, Jordan Hill being on the roster isnt gonna do anything to make LeBron come here, and thats what this is all about. That extra 7mil+ of cap space will. Potentially we may have enough for 2 max contracts, which is huge. And if T-mac plays well its icing on the cake. Coming off these past 2 years, Tmac would most definatly take a few years at around mid-level money if it means playing along side a superstar cast. Expirings + Hill + swapping 1st rounders… after long thought… Id say I’d do it, but that’d be the MOST I’d give up.

P.S. I dont have too much knowledge on the David Lee “Bird Rights” situation. Somebody mentioned earlier that these are waived with this trade… could you explain further?

by Frank E on Feb 15, 2010 6:46 PM EST reply actions  

technically

we would have a chance to have wade/LBJ.

Not saying that it will happen… but it actually could. THat is huge.

by gbaked on Feb 15, 2010 6:49 PM EST up reply actions  

One more comment

Giving up future draft picks is how the Knicks got into their present predicament so why continue this practice. Please additionally remember that there is a possibility that the team will not sign any free agents during the upcoming offseason. if this is the case, having no draft picks will make things only worse.

by VABEARFANAtic on Feb 15, 2010 6:48 PM EST reply actions  

there is no chance

that nobody is signed.

I refuse to believe the respect of the coach, along with the #1 market in teh world is not enough to entice 1 player to come.

by gbaked on Feb 15, 2010 6:50 PM EST up reply actions  

no

They got into the present perdicament by adding on future cap space. This deal does the opposite of that. If they had their picks (Noah, Thomas), they wouldnt be much better.

by Frank E on Feb 15, 2010 6:50 PM EST up reply actions  

I disagree that no one's coming here...cuz someone will...

but I agree 1000000% that the trading the picks is how they ended up POS’s.

Its exactly how they ended up POS’s actually….

Bye, AP :(

by FreeBradshaw on Feb 15, 2010 6:52 PM EST up reply actions  

thats just not true

None of those picks blew up in our face. Both players are role players. What happened was we dug ourselves in a salary cap hole that took 2 years to get out of. And Donnie has done a good job of getting ourselves out of that enormous hole so far

by Frank E on Feb 15, 2010 6:54 PM EST up reply actions  

?

Lamarcus Aldridge and Nene are just 2. Plenty more where that came from….

Not exactly GOATS…but they’d be a whole lot better with them instead of Curry and McDyess

Bye, AP :(

by FreeBradshaw on Feb 15, 2010 6:58 PM EST up reply actions  

not drafting those players put us in the mess?

I forgot about NeNe, but not drafting those players didnt create the mess. Trading for the long term contracts did.

by Frank E on Feb 15, 2010 7:03 PM EST up reply actions  

**trading THEM you mean.

they traded the picks for all these assholes.

Channing Frye for Z-Bo
the first Jazz pick, Josh Smith fell right to them (but the Jazz passed)

Joakim Noah was another one (but they got WillCHan later….Noah And WillChan would’ve been nice)

The problem is all these picks were traded to get all these players on the team.

Bye, AP :(

by FreeBradshaw on Feb 15, 2010 7:08 PM EST up reply actions  

those assholes

Had major long term contracts… McGrady is an expiring contract. And I believe that Wilson Chandler came from a pick from Chicago (the 2 exchanged first rounders in 07, CHI got Noah, NYK got Chandler)

by Frank E on Feb 15, 2010 7:12 PM EST up reply actions  

OK..

so give em expiring contracts for McGrady. Make it an expiring contract orgy and exchange 2011 draft picks.

Do that.

Don’t trade the 2009 draft pick too.

Find a better deal for Jeffries. This one doesn’t work.

Bye, AP :(

by FreeBradshaw on Feb 15, 2010 7:19 PM EST up reply actions  

I can't believe I agree with you

But, you hit it right on the head about how we got into this mess. Thomas refused to rebuild “for real”. instead he kept taking on more large contracts. You can only do that if your boss wants you to, that’ s why he’s still close with Dolan. The worse owner in NBA history.

by gaga71 on Feb 15, 2010 8:06 PM EST up reply actions  

i'm a rockets fan and i don't like this deal at all

if it doesn’t include david lee, forget it. dorsey is also going to blossom. he is a ferocious rebounder and low post defender.

by inquisitiveman on Feb 15, 2010 6:53 PM EST reply actions  

jordan hill could possibly be the next chris bosh...

say good bye to joey.

Rockets>>>>>>Jazz
Texans>>>>>>>Titans
Super Mario>>>>>>>Vince Young

by Rockets 4 Life on Feb 15, 2010 6:54 PM EST up reply actions  

joeys better right now

but a lottery pick is always intriguing. hill has more offensive potential.

by enron4515 on Feb 15, 2010 6:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Ok..i can't disagree with you since

i’ve never seen Hill play.. but since you’re a Rox fan, i will take your word for it.

by inquisitiveman on Feb 15, 2010 6:59 PM EST up reply actions  

believe me lowry is as tradeable for us as gallianri is to you.

Rockets>>>>>>Jazz
Texans>>>>>>>Titans
Super Mario>>>>>>>Vince Young

by Rockets 4 Life on Feb 15, 2010 6:55 PM EST up reply actions  

gallinari*

Rockets>>>>>>Jazz
Texans>>>>>>>Titans
Super Mario>>>>>>>Vince Young

by Rockets 4 Life on Feb 15, 2010 6:56 PM EST up reply actions  

hahaha

like they would trade him away

by enron4515 on Feb 15, 2010 6:55 PM EST up reply actions  

then FUCK this trade

simple as that, this trade doesnt address a need, it addresses a want

CHUUUUUUUUUUUUUCH

by IB on Feb 15, 2010 6:57 PM EST up reply actions  

Forget Lebron/Wade

I am a diehard Knick fan, but I do not see Lebron coming to NY especially if the Cavs win the NBA title. Wade might benefit more since he would get more endorsements but don’t count on it. In fact, the team’s current roster is not attractive for potential free agents who want to join a winning program. That is why giving the Rockets draft picks is an extremely BAD idea. In addition, if McGrady is so good, why isn’t he playing with the Rockets

by VABEARFANAtic on Feb 15, 2010 6:55 PM EST reply actions  

we hate him.

he is a punk.

Rockets>>>>>>Jazz
Texans>>>>>>>Titans
Super Mario>>>>>>>Vince Young

by Rockets 4 Life on Feb 15, 2010 6:57 PM EST up reply actions  

This.

He’s pretty well hated by the Rockets fanbase at this point.
It’s another reason I like this trade, because at minimum it ships his whiny, lazy ass out of here. Not sure why the Knicks management like him so much.

Minnesotan Rockets fan

by Barragan on Feb 15, 2010 7:01 PM EST up reply actions  

He seems to be mostly hated by the vocal types that like to voice their opinions on the internet

Opinions about him IRL are more varied.

In answer to the original question, he has not played because Adelman apparently feels he cannot contribute more than any of the other rotations players. Or, at least, he cannot be happy with the amount of play he would see, given his contributions.

by Only_A_Lad on Feb 15, 2010 7:04 PM EST up reply actions  

that was better put :)

Rockets>>>>>>Jazz
Texans>>>>>>>Titans
Super Mario>>>>>>>Vince Young

by Rockets 4 Life on Feb 15, 2010 8:12 PM EST up reply actions  

i disagree

i think lebron would leave if he won a title with the cavs, only because the money would be incredible and he would be become more famous than any other nba star past of present because ny has been waiting anxiously for years for a player of his caliber

CHUUUUUUUUUUUUUCH

by IB on Feb 15, 2010 7:00 PM EST up reply actions  

Agree with you

McGrady is more like cap space relief and anything more from him is considered a bonus. So if he can play well, just a plus for you guys. LBJ’s destination this summer will be determined on how well the Cavs do in the playoffs. The Cavs getting Amare eventhough they’re doing well now is a sign by Cavs management to Lebron that they want to help him win a title.

by inquisitiveman on Feb 15, 2010 7:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Personally, i would think the Knicks and Rockets could

get better deals with other teams. Hopefully, both teams wait till 1pm Thursday to entertain offers from other teams….lol

by inquisitiveman on Feb 15, 2010 7:00 PM EST reply actions  

everyone knows that

The extra 7 mil is about putting the pieces around LeBron.

by Frank E on Feb 15, 2010 7:05 PM EST up reply actions  

by trading a piece away....

unless McGrady’s a piece? (POS…)

Bye, AP :(

by FreeBradshaw on Feb 15, 2010 7:09 PM EST up reply actions  

but

LeBron doesnt consider Jordan Hill a piece, he hasnt been on the court enough for them to convince him otherwise

by Frank E on Feb 15, 2010 7:10 PM EST up reply actions  

what are you his agent now?

That asshole doesn’t think of anyone as a “piece”.

Bye, AP :(

by FreeBradshaw on Feb 15, 2010 7:17 PM EST up reply actions  

What Im saying is everything theyre doing is to entice LeBron to come here. Jordan Hill isnt doing anything for them in that category. Having the 7mil to sign someone else will.

by Frank E on Feb 15, 2010 7:19 PM EST up reply actions  

no shit

they wont do that though. you cant have your cake and eat it too

by Frank E on Feb 15, 2010 7:23 PM EST up reply actions  

and you can?

you’re banking so much on HWSNBN coming here. What if he doesn’t? There’s a chance of him staying in Cleveland you know. There’s also a chance he wants to play with the Nets in Brooklyn (Jerry Colagelo’s possibly going there…).

The Knicks could end up with their dicks in their hands this offseason.

Then they sign Chris Bosh, Gilbert Arenas and re-up McGrady.

Looks like a stupid idea doesn’t it?

Why are we not waiting till the LAST POSSIBLE minute to trade Jeffries? Why now?

There’s gotta be a better deal.

Just cuz they shit can Jeffires doesn’t mean the Fake ass King is coming here.

Bye, AP :(

by FreeBradshaw on Feb 15, 2010 7:30 PM EST up reply actions  

why not stick to the plan

Jordan Hill doesnt make me want to change my plans, he hasnt shown enough. Theres more than LeBron out there too

by Frank E on Feb 15, 2010 7:32 PM EST up reply actions  

You guys should go

after Wade though he might likely stay put in Miami.

by inquisitiveman on Feb 15, 2010 7:34 PM EST up reply actions  

he wont if they dont sign anyone else to compliment him

he needs amare or joe johnson to join him. hopefully, he signs with NY this summer before miami can lure anyone down to help him. i still think of the heat like its the 90s

by Ray Smuckles on Feb 15, 2010 7:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Agree..that is why from now

till Thursday, you can probably figure out if he stays in Miami or not. :-)

by inquisitiveman on Feb 15, 2010 7:40 PM EST up reply actions  

because we already goofed?

Walsh doesn’t want to screw up like he did last trade deadline, where he could have traded Nate and Jeffries to Sacremento for Expiring Contracts. Might as well get rid of him when you have the chance and give up the unknown in Hill, rather than TD, where you don’t have a PG on the Roster this summer if you do that.

by IceBlade on Feb 15, 2010 7:33 PM EST up reply actions  

So...

give up Nate.

Give up Lee for all I care. I’m tired of his shitty defense.

Hill’s got the potential to be better then Lee.

Bye, AP :(

by FreeBradshaw on Feb 15, 2010 7:40 PM EST up reply actions  

They can’t give up Nate anymore because of his Bird rights, he would have to ok a trade. You have to hedge yours bets, because I’m sure that the only two players that Houston was interested in were Hill and Gallinari. and I’d rather see Hill go than Gallo.

by IceBlade on Feb 15, 2010 7:44 PM EST up reply actions  

i agree

they can have lee, just give us a point guard

CHUUUUUUUUUUUUUCH

by IB on Feb 15, 2010 7:46 PM EST up reply actions  

yup.

Hill I thought was here to replace Lee.

I thought they re-signed David Lee just to give him up in just a deal like this, to get rid of Jeffires.

Lee wants to win, send him to Houston. Let him win.

Bye, AP :(

by FreeBradshaw on Feb 15, 2010 7:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Lee has bird rights also

Although he’d probably allow a trade, he’d be a 10.5 mil cap hold on houston this summer

by Frank E on Feb 15, 2010 7:49 PM EST up reply actions  

I believe that

Lee would lose his Bird Rights in a trade, based on the type of contract he signed, so he loses a lot of the incentive to trade for him.

by Mount17 on Feb 15, 2010 8:00 PM EST up reply actions  

Nah

Lee’s also a BYC – very difficult to trade.

by fuhry on Feb 16, 2010 2:56 PM EST up reply actions  

Mr. Shaw is right!

I’d give up Nate or Lee before I’d give up Hill in that trade! He does have the potential to be better than Lee. Giving up the last first rounder and 2012 is a bad idea.

by gaga71 on Feb 15, 2010 8:21 PM EST up reply actions  

damn

this is terrifying. I’d hate to see another knick draft pick succeed in a different market cause we gave up on him too soon. hopefully donnie can swing it so its only the 2011 swap, and not the 2012 pick. But if we have wade and lebron running around, i guess its all roses.

I 2nd that it should be hughes instead of harrington in this deal if possible, to keep open the tyrus thomas possibility with chicago. And everyone’s favorite…lineup projections!

pg – TD
sg – wade
sf – lebron
pf – Lee/thomas/gallo/chandler/jerome james?
c – not available at this time

by Ray Smuckles on Feb 15, 2010 7:05 PM EST reply actions  

cmon

jerome is the big man in the middle

by enron4515 on Feb 15, 2010 7:53 PM EST up reply actions  

gross dude

a team with jerome as the starting center winning it all? id never watch ball again

by Ray Smuckles on Feb 15, 2010 8:02 PM EST up reply actions  

All Rockets fan seem to

Love this trade….but I gotta give a little credit to Donnie…..THE KNICKS are way under the cap…..and when your under the cap u can do anything…..we can get free agents, we can make more trades, and we can even get back some drafts picks…..I hate losing Jordan Hill but I have to believe that Donnie and Mike know what they’re are doing…..the turning point to the Knicks future is right now……and I have to believe it’s gonna way better then what we have all been through

by JkiLLa on Feb 15, 2010 7:28 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

just curious

if we had to lose one, you guys (and girls) prefer losing TD or Hill? personally, i would much rather keep TD, given our need for pgs and logjam at PF. If we are capable of resigning lee, how much is Hill going to play anyhow??

by Ray Smuckles on Feb 15, 2010 7:35 PM EST reply actions  

agreed

TD is more valuable because of the lack of quality PGs who become free agents, as opposed to the larger quantity of PFs who do. and if we can re-up Lee, then it seems like a reasonable sale.

by IceBlade on Feb 15, 2010 7:38 PM EST up reply actions  

I'd rather keep Hill.

there’s always PG’s on the market. If Duhon can be semi good…so could someeone else.

You don’t find players like Hill when you don’t have lottery picks.

Bye, AP :(

by FreeBradshaw on Feb 15, 2010 7:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Hill

Rather have Hill, Douglas is more of a shooter than a PG anyways. Hill’s got more potential

by Frank E on Feb 15, 2010 7:39 PM EST up reply actions  

he has to adjust from his college days when he was a scoring pg

put him with a playmaking sg, alah mcgrady or wade, and i think TD is the perfect compliment pg. similar to maybe mo williams in cleveland

by Ray Smuckles on Feb 15, 2010 8:03 PM EST up reply actions  

I'd say TD

I thought he’d be more of a contributor by now, but I like his defensive prowess. Fits in with what I think the NY Knicks should be.

by fuhry on Feb 16, 2010 2:58 PM EST up reply actions  

Possibilty

I think Amare going to Cleveland can actually help us get LBJ.

Amare loves playing for dantoni and played his best basketball with him. If Amare and Lebron have something good going then dantoni can convince to have Amare and Lebron to NY.

Then clearing as much space as we can is the best thing

JETS
External optimist
Internal pessimist

by michael28102 on Feb 15, 2010 7:39 PM EST reply actions  

pretty sure

pretty sure d’antoni hates amare… gotta pray against the cavs getting him

by Frank E on Feb 15, 2010 7:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Get a hold of yourselves

Thats the first thing. As the deadline comes, the rumors go apeshit. Now there is talk that Amare DOESN’T want to go to Cleveland. Nothing is set until its set.

That being said, you guys act like we have choices about where to send Jefferies and Harrington. This is an example of how BAD our contracts are. We aren’t looking for TMac to save our franchise. We want him for his space-clearing monster contract. You think the Rockets are stupid?! Hell no!! We have to give them SOMETHING of value for such a huge cap relief!! Enter Jordan Hill. Enter at least 1 Draft pick. Enter expiring contract.

Exchanging picks for 2011 is not such a bad thing. Sure giving up a 2012 1st rounder is worrisome, as is giving up our 2010 lottery pick, but this is the position we are in.

You think teams don’t know about Al Harrington as a chemistry killer? You think they feel Jared Jefferies is worth his money? Hey, Larry Hughes, now HERE’S a guy who plays nice. Decent player, but how many times has he been traded in the last 4 years?! Gimme a break.

NY has NO LEVERAGE here. I don’t like the possibility of giving up 2 1st round picks (2012 better be lotto protected!), but that also is speculation anyways. The player framework is really not bad. We HAVE to make a trade that is weighted towards th other team if we expect to move the guys we want.

"you're the Rod Thorn in my Chris Bosh side."

by Chris Child's Fist on Feb 15, 2010 7:40 PM EST reply actions  

there IS no better deal for Jefferies.

Why do you think NY hasn’t pulled any moves?!?!?! Our assets suck!!!

"you're the Rod Thorn in my Chris Bosh side."

by Chris Child's Fist on Feb 15, 2010 7:42 PM EST up reply actions  

then fuck it.

the top 2 aint coming here. Bosh sucks. Joe Johnson needs one of the top 2 to be good.

Fuck it, wait for Melo and Chris Paul.

I’d rather wait til 2011 then trade all of our first round picks again.

Just like the isiah era…we’ll be HOLDING OUR DICKS…looking at this bullshit ass team.

Bye, AP :(

by FreeBradshaw on Feb 15, 2010 7:45 PM EST up reply actions  

yeah

Bosh sucks but Jordan Hill is the 2nd coming… get a clue man… just because a player wears a Knicks jersey and is a rookie doesnt mean he’s going to be special

by Frank E on Feb 15, 2010 7:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Bosh does suck...he's a pile of shit and a pussy

Hill may not be special…he may be.

I do think youre the one that needs a clue, hedging your bets on all these dudes coming to NY…

They’re all more unknown then Jordan Hill.

Players like Hill, with they small contracts…are how you build a deep team.

Bye, AP :(

by FreeBradshaw on Feb 15, 2010 7:50 PM EST up reply actions  

WTF are you talking about!!?

Bosh doesn’t suck, and he ain’t no pile of shit. He isn’t my first choice, but if he is available, get him. In fact out of all the big names in the upcomming open market, he’s probably most likely to come to the Knicks. Tim Duncan was a bit of a pussy, so was Robinson, but now he’s a “hall of fame pussy.” I’d love to get Bosh, but he needs another star to play with. Same thing happened to KG happened to Bosh..small market, low budget. Come to NY Bosh!!!

by gaga71 on Feb 16, 2010 3:32 PM EST up reply actions  

No.

Once Bosh leaves Toronto, say goodbye to big lines. He is NOT what we need. He is a wimp. He deserves no such comparison to Tim Duncan.

"you're the Rod Thorn in my Chris Bosh side."

by Chris Child's Fist on Feb 16, 2010 6:39 PM EST up reply actions  

i'm sorry but i gotta disagree with you on this one.

there’s no way you’d go through another year for this same BS to in 2011. Carmelo and Paul are just gonna pull the same shit LBJ is doing now. And we’re still going to be painful to watch. Got to give to get…

by JLS125 on Feb 15, 2010 8:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Im freaking out, man!

i heard about that amare rumor; you know he doesn’t want to play with shaqtus again.
I agree with you too, that NY probably has the worst assets out of all the teams looking to make trades, aside from their young talent. We are keeping gallo and chandler, which is excellent, and yes Hill might be good, but then again he might not. Got to do something with JJ, because with him out, NY is the #1 player this summer, in the biggest FA market the NBA has ever seen.

by Ray Smuckles on Feb 15, 2010 7:48 PM EST up reply actions  

not the biggest free agent market ever seen, jus one that features two established team changing superstars

every other player is either headed into their 30’s or is already there.

CHUUUUUUUUUUUUUCH

by IB on Feb 15, 2010 7:51 PM EST up reply actions  

joe johnson and boozer id say as well

you are right though, that guys like allen, ginobli, and t-mac longterm are not what we’re interested in. biggest as in most talented

by Ray Smuckles on Feb 15, 2010 7:55 PM EST up reply actions  

clear up massive cap space?

what the hell are you talking about? The only money that comes off the books for the Knicks in the deal would be Jeffries’s, which isn’t even that large.

by secret defense on Feb 15, 2010 7:48 PM EST up reply actions  

well

I’d rather wait another year to get Paul or Camelo instead of giving away some much of our future.

by secret defense on Feb 15, 2010 7:51 PM EST up reply actions  

This.

Curry’s off the books in 2011 too.

Melo and CP3 in 2011.

Fuck Lebron and his mom

Bye, AP :(

by FreeBradshaw on Feb 15, 2010 7:52 PM EST up reply actions  

i dont see Donnie giving away as many picks as the initial article says

if he were, then this would be news, not a rumor. losing Hill does suck for now, but could look brilliant if he’s still the same player 5 years from now.

by Ray Smuckles on Feb 15, 2010 7:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Paul can't opt out until 2012

Melo can opt out in 2011. But based on a potential lockout or new CBA, who knows what’s going to happen. But I’m all for waiting for Melo instead of wasting our cap space on Joe Johnson.

by Mount17 on Feb 15, 2010 8:04 PM EST up reply actions  

also

I really doubt that Lebron or Wade is leaving their teams. So even if we get Bosh, he’s the only guy in this class that’s really worth a max contract.

by secret defense on Feb 15, 2010 7:52 PM EST up reply actions  

wade is unhappy in miami

if you check out any heat games he is swarmed almost every time he crosses the 3-pt. line with the ball. If they don’t bring in anyone legit to help him, i have no doubt he will look elsewhere. plus he and lebron are on record as saying they would love to play together, which admittingly isnt much, but it is something

by Ray Smuckles on Feb 15, 2010 7:57 PM EST up reply actions  

Even if he leaves Miami..

he’ll probably go to Chicago which has more talent than the Knicks, hell even Miami’s roster has more talent.

by secret defense on Feb 15, 2010 8:01 PM EST up reply actions  

with a 2nd FA

in addition to chandler, gallo, td? c’mon. miami has beasley with a damaged psyche and o’neal with damaged knees. chalmers was demoted to 3rd string BEFORE he shattered his ankle. Other than that, they only have a mighty UDONIS!…

…who is terrible.

by Ray Smuckles on Feb 15, 2010 9:00 PM EST up reply actions  

supporting cast

I believe the Knicks have near the supporting cast of Miami or Cleveland. If Cleveland lands Jamison or Amare, who appears to have no chance of going there, then its Cleveland wins the supporting cast argument for the time being. All the cap space gives the Knicks the opportunity to give LeBron whatever supporting cast he desires, in addition to having Chandler and Gallo. P.S. Jermaine Oneals a free agent, so he wont be part of the supporting cast Wade would be looking at

by Frank E on Feb 15, 2010 9:13 PM EST up reply actions  

jeffries

clearing out Jeffries is bigger than you think. hes making 7 mil next year. Thats nearly the difference between a max free agent and mid-level exception priced player

by Frank E on Feb 15, 2010 7:50 PM EST up reply actions  

GREAT!!

mid-leve exception.

Might as well just keep Jeffires…

Bye, AP :(

by FreeBradshaw on Feb 15, 2010 7:51 PM EST up reply actions  

there would be an extra $9.5M coming off the cap in the current construction of the deal...

via REALGM

The deal would give the Rockets young talent in exchange for McGrady, a player no longer in the team’s plans, while the Knicks have a look at McGrady the rest of this season and clear approximately $9.5 million more of salary cap room for their summer free-agent pursuits.

by JLS125 on Feb 15, 2010 8:05 PM EST up reply actions  

It is deja vu - Isiah is back!

I’m from New York and I love NY. I think it is great that DW gets rid of Jeffries but it is unbelievable if he gives up the 2012 1st round pick and the 2011 switch as well as Hill. It could be he is old enough that he is hoping that McGrady gets 20 year old legs and he hits a home run this summer. If not he is really hurting the team long-term.

by chgobr on Feb 15, 2010 7:43 PM EST reply actions  

I grimace just thinking about such a lopsided trade

-Knicks are building for the long term future, whether they get the big three this offseason or not.
-McGrady is washed up, injury prone, and a malcontent in the locker room.
-Jordan Hill is young and could develop into a good player.
-Knicks need to keep their draft picks because in case they don’t improve their roster drastically they would be losing lottery picks in the future.
-Jefferies’s contract is not that huge, and after next season both him and Curry’s contracts expire which would allow as to sign Chris Paul, which is really what this team needs.

Anyway you look at it this deal makes zero sense for the Knicks.

by secret defense on Feb 15, 2010 7:44 PM EST reply actions  

Paul won’t be a free agent until 2012, so that doesn’t quite work. But agreed as far as picks go.

by IceBlade on Feb 15, 2010 7:52 PM EST up reply actions  

My point is

we can’t put all our eggs in hoping Lebron or Wade comes this offseason. Why can’t we build a young team like what Memphis or Oklahoma City has? Even if you look at Boston which revamped their team overnight, they drafted Rondo which was a huge part of their success. You have to be able to draft well, and Walsh hasn’t done a good job of it so far.

by secret defense on Feb 15, 2010 8:03 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t like this at all. Just to get rid of Jared we give away Hill, exchange picks and lose a first round pick? Doesn’t seem worth it.

Darrelle Revis once won a game of Connect Four in three moves.

by bm01bath on Feb 15, 2010 7:45 PM EST reply actions  

Thank you!

I’m agreeing with a friggin Jets fan!

This rumor has to go away…

Bye, AP :(

by FreeBradshaw on Feb 15, 2010 7:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Donnie Walsh panics

It seemed like DW had a clear vision to get the Knicks respectable. Now he panics. It is like Knick GMs cannot think long-term. Maybe this is pressure from above triggering a panic move. Unbelievable!

by chgobr on Feb 15, 2010 7:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Well it is planning for the future

its with the FA’s this offseason.

The problem is…he’s giving up part of the future in the process.

Bye, AP :(

by FreeBradshaw on Feb 15, 2010 7:56 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't like it.

I like the idea of getting McGrady, but to give up Hill and the 2012 first rounder is a nasty gamble that would lower Walsh in my eyes, worthy of Isiah ykw. If the deal includes their first rounder this year, then the deal would be better. I hope Walsh is as smart as we think he is.

by gaga71 on Feb 15, 2010 7:49 PM EST reply actions  

Nope doesn't work

Bird Rights, same as Nate, he would have to agree with the trade.

by IceBlade on Feb 15, 2010 7:55 PM EST up reply actions  

(ment to hit reply, not make a separate thread)

Lee would only want to go to a contendor, and NO ONE wants to go to the Hornets. West is gonna be gone in 2011, and Paul in 2012.

I mean something doable would be like Lee to OKC, but you could only get Eric Maynor back. And he’s too untested.

@FreeBradshaw: Same problem as going to Hornets, he’ll void it.

by IceBlade on Feb 15, 2010 8:01 PM EST up reply actions  

seth

i hoped you were monitoring this insanity. you chose a poignant comment to enter on

by Ray Smuckles on Feb 15, 2010 8:05 PM EST up reply actions  

trade lee to Houston

and we will only ask for Curry and no more….. :-)

by inquisitiveman on Feb 15, 2010 8:04 PM EST up reply actions  

He looses his Bird Rights in a trade

Houston won’t want him. Plus, Morey values defense.

by Mount17 on Feb 15, 2010 8:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Because they wouldn't want to keep him

They already have Carl Landry and Luis Scola, and then they’ll get Yao Back eventually. if he was a true center, they would be interested, but they want to shed payroll, and take back CHEAP young prospects, like Hill.

by IceBlade on Feb 15, 2010 8:07 PM EST up reply actions  

cheap young prospects...

you mean the ones that the Knicks should be keeping to build around their FA’s?

OH!

Bye, AP :(

by FreeBradshaw on Feb 15, 2010 8:08 PM EST up reply actions  

But you need the extra cap space to get free agents to play around them, otherwise (like seth said) you end up like the Pistons, where you can’t get Max players so you fill the void with rejects and imperfect skilled players.

by IceBlade on Feb 15, 2010 8:10 PM EST up reply actions  

Lee Harrington and Jeffries

for McGrady and whoever else (Dorsey?) exchange the 2011 first rounders for all I care too. Maybe give the 2012 pick as well

Bye, AP :(

by FreeBradshaw on Feb 15, 2010 7:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Gotta be a winner, or have young talent

Lee would only want to go to a contendor, and NO ONE wants to go to the Hornets. West is gonna be gone in 2011, and Paul in 2012.

I mean something doable would be like Lee to OKC, but you could only get Eric Maynor back. And he’s too untested.

by IceBlade on Feb 15, 2010 7:59 PM EST reply actions  

keep in mind

joe johnson and boozer are enough for the knicks to make the playoffs (and not barely) next season

by enron4515 on Feb 15, 2010 8:01 PM EST reply actions  

Only problem with that is if you get Boozer, you now don’t have the size to compete at an elite level. Even though his defense is terrible, Amare in place of Boozer would probably better just from a shear size point.

by IceBlade on Feb 15, 2010 8:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Your overall feel on the rumor?

Darrelle Revis once won a game of Connect Four in three moves.

by bm01bath on Feb 15, 2010 8:04 PM EST up reply actions  

it'd certainly make this summer very exciting

massive, massive, massive gamble. there could be a huge payoff, but the knicks also run the risk of doing what the pistons just did and spending way too much on sub-par players.

i’m not for or against the deal, but i certainly wouldn’t sleep much for the next few months if it went down.

also, including hill AND the 2012 pick is pretty rotten.

by Seth on Feb 15, 2010 8:06 PM EST up reply actions  

My hope is that we are good enough that the 2012 pick is verrrryyyyy low and we are better than the Rockets so the pick exchange doesn’t happen. If the trade goes down.

Darrelle Revis once won a game of Connect Four in three moves.

by bm01bath on Feb 15, 2010 8:07 PM EST up reply actions  

that's how I'm gonna feel.

if it goes down..I’m gonna be pissed every single time I see the Knicks box score or a highlight of them.

If they’re good next season, fine.

Bye, AP :(

by FreeBradshaw on Feb 15, 2010 8:10 PM EST up reply actions  

YES HUGE NEWS

Amare does not want to play in Cleveland… this is huge. If Cavs had gotten amare Id say the Knicks have 5% or less chance at LBJ

http://realgm.com/src_wiretap_archives/64724/20100215/amare_does_not_want_to_play_in_cleveland/

ps. Whats that tell you about Amare… what a loser

by Frank E on Feb 15, 2010 8:03 PM EST reply actions  

Hate’s Shaq?

Darrelle Revis once won a game of Connect Four in three moves.

by bm01bath on Feb 15, 2010 8:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Hates*

Darrelle Revis once won a game of Connect Four in three moves.

by bm01bath on Feb 15, 2010 8:04 PM EST up reply actions  

u did hear about the chance of Shaq being traded

if Amare goes to Cavs right? Cavs are looking to trade Shaq to Wiz for Jamison and Miller if they get Amare.

by inquisitiveman on Feb 15, 2010 8:08 PM EST up reply actions  

also possibly shaq to indiana

for murphy and friends. cavs still covet a stretch-4

by Ray Smuckles on Feb 15, 2010 8:10 PM EST up reply actions  

yes..i did hear about that also

i wonder though if all of this does happen, it could mess up their chemistry with only 30 games left…interesting to say the least

by inquisitiveman on Feb 15, 2010 8:12 PM EST up reply actions  

yeah

strange to hear so much about a team that has won 14 straight, yet scrambling at the deadline

by Ray Smuckles on Feb 15, 2010 8:15 PM EST up reply actions  

wow

thats insulting to shaq… and idk if theyd be better with amare in his place

by enron4515 on Feb 15, 2010 8:17 PM EST up reply actions  

defensively absolutely not

and i thought team-D was mike brown’s whole gig. they’d have who then?

pg – mo
sg – parker/west
sf – lbj
pf – murphy or jamison
c – amare

they could score a lot of points, put how could they stop orlando or la from scoring more?

by Ray Smuckles on Feb 15, 2010 8:19 PM EST up reply actions  

That article right there reeks of gamesmanship

I wouldn’t be surprised if that was phoenix trying to boost the return for Amare.

by mob16151 on Feb 16, 2010 2:11 PM EST up reply actions  

but Amare might not have a choice

and play out the season with the Cavs and then go elsewhere next season if he really hates Cleveland

by inquisitiveman on Feb 15, 2010 8:07 PM EST reply actions  

so ugh??

what if lebron doesnt opt out?
it is possible if not plausible.
then this trade is really a piece of shit

by karamjitm9090 on Feb 15, 2010 8:12 PM EST reply actions  

wade, bosh

and a resigned lee? that’s probably better than LBJ and “X” anyhow, given the roster needs

by Ray Smuckles on Feb 15, 2010 8:14 PM EST up reply actions  

yes they do

…and for that opportunity, i wouldn’t even say that bosh is a guaranteed max anyhow.

by Ray Smuckles on Feb 15, 2010 8:21 PM EST up reply actions  

You only retain Bird Rights

if you don’t renounce his rights, and if Lee isn’t renounced, he has a $10.5 million cap hold which counts against the cap before any free agents could be signed.

by Mount17 on Feb 15, 2010 8:24 PM EST up reply actions  

No

The system is set up that the cap hold is a lot more expensive for a player with a cheap contract (so you can’t sign a player cheap and promise that you’ll give him big money the next year when the cap won’t be a problem. If he would have signed for the minimum the cap hold still would have been sizable, though possibly less than 10.5.

by Mount17 on Feb 15, 2010 8:28 PM EST up reply actions  

wade n bosh can also decide not to opt out

what im saying is. you cant just give away soo much for a chance to get more. to be honest if im lebron i just avoid it all and opt out in 2011. this way he gets to see exactly where wade bosh amare boozer etc end up. then he can be the last piece.

by karamjitm9090 on Feb 15, 2010 8:18 PM EST up reply actions  

i hear you man

incredible risk, and we could end up with very little to show for it. But, with all the room to wheel and deal, you figure this summer is when the knicks will be the most patient. knowing james (personally, we play poker every tuesday at 3:00 am), he will try to assert himself as the main man this summer (unless they win it all in Cleveland), and not be a follower

by Ray Smuckles on Feb 15, 2010 8:25 PM EST up reply actions  

A few notes...

-Ultimately, this deal is a gamble. I understand the logic from both perspectives. Furthering ‘The Plan’ by getting rid of cap space, flyer on McGrady. We find out if it works on July 1st.

-The Rockets brass could have floated this rumor to increase McGrady’s value.

-Sounds like DW/D’Antoni have given up on Hill (never liked him?).

-As someone who makes himself watch every game, this season has gotten awfully frustrating (reaching a new low against Sac.). T-Mac would spice things up a little bit, at the least. He has alot to prove, and alot of money to be earned.

-I think that wherever LeBron signs, he is gonna have opt-out clauses built into to multiple years of his contract.

by tz88 on Feb 15, 2010 9:53 PM EST reply actions  

never finished my last point…i get the feeling we’re gonna be going through this same drama in the future

by tz88 on Feb 15, 2010 9:54 PM EST up reply actions  

I wonder why they draft someone they dislike.

Darrelle Revis once won a game of Connect Four in three moves.

by bm01bath on Feb 15, 2010 9:54 PM EST up reply actions  

i dont think DW would make this suggested rumor, we’ll keep either hill or the first round pick

by tz88 on Feb 15, 2010 9:57 PM EST up reply actions  

i think

once they couldnt swing deals for rubio or land curry, they went for the best available. hill was projected to go #3 in some espn mock drafts

by Frank E on Feb 15, 2010 10:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Hill was always a pawn to resign David Lee

He was insurance. The Knicks wanted Curry or Flynn. Since both were gone, they took Hill and his athleticism and raw potential. They were spooked by Brandon Jenning’s mouth so they didn’t have him high on their lists. Doesn’t mean it was the right move, it just is what it is.

"you're the Rod Thorn in my Chris Bosh side."

by Chris Child's Fist on Feb 16, 2010 10:22 AM EST up reply actions  

jared jeffries is the reason why the knicks were winning.

david lee has been consistently great and the knicks have been anything consistent. when the knicks were winning it was largely because jeffries went from playing absolutely terrible to very very good. he holds the team together and it would be unfortunate to see him go.

by nba refs: man up on Feb 15, 2010 10:19 PM EST reply actions  

I'm going to miss hearing John Mellencamp

Without Jefferies kick ass defense (and recent DECENT scoring efforts) we’d be aligned with the lowly nets record.

T-Mac is going to be a waste (injury prone, cry baby)
Giving up first round picks PERIOD is a major No-No-No- NOOOOOOO!
The loss of a rookie puts us in a precarious position going forward-

if this actually happens boy am I going to miss hearing small town-

by dpileofashes on Feb 15, 2010 10:29 PM EST up reply actions  

i wanted to see tmac on the knicks

but i dont want to see the knicks lose a rookie and jeffries for him.. any big time player coming here would love playing with such a great team player like jeffries.

by nba refs: man up on Feb 16, 2010 12:31 AM EST up reply actions  

jefferies has played hard

but he is not part of the future team. We all knew this too. His minutes have been mostly to increase his value to other teams. And it has worked. He’s a good defensive guy, but at $7 Mil a year, thats just too much for a guy who is a GOOD, not great defensive stopper with a very weak offensive game.

"you're the Rod Thorn in my Chris Bosh side."

by Chris Child's Fist on Feb 16, 2010 10:26 AM EST up reply actions  

I have a question for those of you who are the smartest bloggers on this blog.

Ever since this rumor has been brought up, the center piece of the trade for us is Jordan Hill. I know he was drafted in the top 10 but i haven’t seen him play 1 minute. People are comparing him to a raw Chris Bosh. My question is that do you guys(I prefer one of the writers or Seth answer this question) really think Jordan Hill can be a Chris Bosh type of player in a year or two of development?

Rockets>>>>>>Jazz
Texans>>>>>>>Titans
Super Mario>>>>>>>Vince Young

by Rockets 4 Life on Feb 15, 2010 10:38 PM EST reply actions  

its way too early to determine that

he is very raw. he looked a bit behind in the scheme of things early on in his minute.. but always showed a good midrange shot.. his struggled in position on defense but as of late has shown a big step forward in picking the the speed of the game. and he has a MOTOR. he doesnt take plays off and i believe in two years could be a vgood player.. but i wont even try to begin comparing him to a chris bosh.

by semsemma on Feb 15, 2010 10:46 PM EST up reply actions  

thanks for your analysis

Rockets>>>>>>Jazz
Texans>>>>>>>Titans
Super Mario>>>>>>>Vince Young

by Rockets 4 Life on Feb 15, 2010 10:50 PM EST up reply actions  

Sorry, i beleive there is only 2 writers here. The rest of us just make inappropriate jokes

Jordan Hill is a solid talent. Whether he gets a chance to develop is another question. He has the athleticism and he has the size. We knew when we drafted him that he was a project and not as NBA ready as other picks. The thing is, he has only been playing organized hoops since he was a HS Junior. He came out of Arizona after his Sophmore year. So the kid has only been playing for like 4 years, and each year he has made extremely positive strides. He could very well continue to grow at a very fast pace. I’m not sure of his ceiling, but I hate picking one of the top guys in the league right now to compare him too. But he is a hustler and an efficient player. I would certainly beleive he could be a double-double guy.

"you're the Rod Thorn in my Chris Bosh side."

by Chris Child's Fist on Feb 16, 2010 10:33 AM EST up reply actions  

what strides

What strides has he made this year?

by Frank E on Feb 16, 2010 11:01 AM EST up reply actions  

well hes earned consistent playing time over the last 8 games

and he doesn’t just stand around and wait for things to happen. He’s getting involved and helping out.

It’s been the opinion of many here that he has played well enough to deserve more minutes, so it’s a matter of time.

What are your expectations of him?!

"you're the Rod Thorn in my Chris Bosh side."

by Chris Child's Fist on Feb 16, 2010 11:44 AM EST up reply actions  

i'm certainly not the smartest blogger on this blog, but i am seth.

hill will be a very serviceable player, but i don’t think he necessarily compares to bosh. i get the feeling that he favors scoring off of the pick-and-roll, so i suppose i picture more of a stoudemire-type player, but with bosh’s body type, perhaps.

really, though, hill’s his own dude.

by Seth on Feb 16, 2010 10:44 AM EST up reply actions  

HEEELLL NAAH

Cook and dorsey are scrubs.. they basically play as roster fillers in this deal.

and no way does DONNIE WALSH do this deal.

a) Giving away our 09 pick, we already are out of a 010 pick. swiitching our 11, adn giving the 12 away?

b) who the hell is going to be our frontcourt? w/ jeffires and harrington gone. hill would get the minutes. I love what JHILL has shown in the lilttle bit of playing time he has recieved. and w/ hill gone. i guess this means eddy curry will be starting? LLegs??

this is way too much imo.. dont get desparate.. the rockets are playing hard ball b/c they “dont have to deal tmac”. true.. and if this is there asking price.. i say bluff until the midnight of the 17th….

by semsemma on Feb 15, 2010 10:43 PM EST reply actions  

believe me when i say this

joey dorsey is no scrub. you are saying that he is one because you have not seen him play. when we played memphis who has one of the best front courts in the nba, he dominated. he had 7 points, 12 boards, and 2 blocks in only 18 minutes. he is as strong as dwight howard and can rebound just as well as dwight. (im not saying he is dwight, but he is just as physical as him). i would not be surprised if he cracks dantoni’s 8 man rotation.

Rockets>>>>>>Jazz
Texans>>>>>>>Titans
Super Mario>>>>>>>Vince Young

by Rockets 4 Life on Feb 15, 2010 10:54 PM EST up reply actions  

yeah i’ve always liked dorsey, and even cook (who is a stretch 4, always a coveted specialist – and essential to the d’antoni system).

by tz88 on Feb 15, 2010 10:56 PM EST up reply actions  

don't fall in love with cook.

he plays the worst post defense i have ever seen. cook would make jared jeffries or jordan hill look like CB4.

Rockets>>>>>>Jazz
Texans>>>>>>>Titans
Super Mario>>>>>>>Vince Young

by Rockets 4 Life on Feb 15, 2010 11:23 PM EST up reply actions  

my impression is that

except for hill, neither GM could care less what actual players they’re getting in return. unless, of course, the rumors are true that walsh is open to the possibility of re-signing t-mac, in which case i’ll just go crawl into bed and never come out again.

by Seth on Feb 15, 2010 11:30 PM EST up reply actions  

unless tmac blows you guys out of the water with his play

it is going to be hard to take the option of signing him to an extension than just opening up 22.5 million dollars.

Rockets>>>>>>Jazz
Texans>>>>>>>Titans
Super Mario>>>>>>>Vince Young

by Rockets 4 Life on Feb 15, 2010 11:47 PM EST up reply actions  

not so much

Anything tmac contributes in this deal is gravy. If he proves he can be a solid contributor, then we could probably get him at around mid level exception money, which he would definately take after the past 2 years and the likely star cast he’d be surrounded by

by Frank E on Feb 15, 2010 11:49 PM EST up reply actions  

may be right...

but i said that in ignorance. i have never actually watched him play. but from looking at his size/position and his stats.. i dont see him as nothing more than an expiring.

ill just have to take your word for it.

by semsemma on Feb 15, 2010 11:12 PM EST up reply actions  

dajaun blair is only 6'6

look what he is doing in san antonio. our starting center chuck hayes is one of the best post defenders in the nba even though most of the guys he defends against are 6 inches + taller than him. size does not matter unless you are very strong. dorsey, blair, and chuck are very strong and physical. (dorsey is 6’8).

Rockets>>>>>>Jazz
Texans>>>>>>>Titans
Super Mario>>>>>>>Vince Young

by Rockets 4 Life on Feb 15, 2010 11:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Dorsey never balled like Blair did in college

Dorsey was always good, but he’s not nearly as skilled as Blair.

Blair’s more like a young Elton Brand without the 17fter

Bye, AP :(

by FreeBradshaw on Feb 15, 2010 11:23 PM EST up reply actions  

i'm not saying dorsey has the offensive game that blair does.

but he does have the physical tools that blair has. he is just as good as a rebounder as blair and maybe a better post defender. i know it was one game, but dorsey absolutely dominated marc gasol and zach randolph on defense and rebounding.

Rockets>>>>>>Jazz
Texans>>>>>>>Titans
Super Mario>>>>>>>Vince Young

by Rockets 4 Life on Feb 15, 2010 11:45 PM EST up reply actions  

Dorsey was a beast in college

very much like a Dejuan Blair, only with cartilage in his knees…

"you're the Rod Thorn in my Chris Bosh side."

by Chris Child's Fist on Feb 16, 2010 10:36 AM EST up reply actions  

yea

 i ve heard he’s had teh kenny phillips injury. this true?

by semsemma on Feb 16, 2010 1:28 PM EST up reply actions  

yeah, thats why teams passed on him in the draft

2 bad knees?! Doesnt spell long career. But thats what Blair does.. he overcomes. His skills were well known. His health held him back.

"you're the Rod Thorn in my Chris Bosh side."

by Chris Child's Fist on Feb 16, 2010 6:40 PM EST up reply actions  

just a quick update for you guys:

i have an answer to all of you who have been questioning why walsh wants t-mac. it isn’t walsh who wants him, its d’antoni. according to realgm.com d’antoni has been pressing walsh to get mcgrady. also, if jordan hill is not in the deal, it will be toney douglas in his place. this trade may happen tomorrow in fact.

Rockets>>>>>>Jazz
Texans>>>>>>>Titans
Super Mario>>>>>>>Vince Young

by Rockets 4 Life on Feb 15, 2010 11:01 PM EST reply actions  

I'd be OK if it was TD

and there’s no 2012 pick involved

Bye, AP :(

by FreeBradshaw on Feb 15, 2010 11:15 PM EST up reply actions  

OK so here is a contrary thought

Getting rid of JJ makes it possible to get two max free agents. So the real question is: is it worth giving up 1 first round pick and a prospect for a shot to get 2 max free agents? If it increases our chances to get 2 max free agents, why are we crying about losing Jordan Hill? I hate losing him too, and the pick, but let’s face it – DW is not the drafter Zeke was. Aren’t we better off maximizing our shot at attracting 2 MFAs? Isn’t hoping that we draft someone who might be a stud a bigger roll of the dice than actually signing a stud?

by AtlKnicks on Feb 15, 2010 11:35 PM EST up reply actions  

its not the dice being rolled if you sign a player...

its the fact we’re rolling the dice on the chance to sign 2 players.

What if Bawsh wants to go home to Dallass ( I say good)?

Joe Johnson likes the 10x better supporting cast in ATL (I would)

What if HWSNBN really…really wants to play with D-Wade, but wants to do so in South Beech?

These 4 are the only 4 worthy of this whole thing…so the Knicks are caught bare ass with their balls flapping in the wind

No 2009 first rounder, swapped 2011 first rounders (Houston’s pick won’t be in the lottery…Knicks, of course it would). Of course as reported in this, the 2012 is possibly in this, but I doubt that. If its is….who knows where that is.

We’re rolling the dice to roll the dice.

Pretty sure as it stands right now…we got enough to land one max player.

2011…the chance to land another max player.

Why not play for one max player, take the shit easy…and wait till 2011 when Curry and Jeffries are officially gone from the books…and sign say….Melo?

Seems a bit “safer”

Fixing IT’s bullshit required patience…I see no reason to shoot their load right now.

Bye, AP :(

by FreeBradshaw on Feb 16, 2010 12:02 AM EST up reply actions  

disagree

No max player will sign here to wait another year. Players will want to come here. I dont like the idea of having to give up 2012 plus swap 2011. But Id give up Hill and swap 2011. Not like the Rockets are even guaranteed to be outside the lottery

Jordan Hill = 29 DNP-CD’s on a rebuilding team 13 games under .500. In games he’s played over 10 minutes the Knicks are 1-11

by Frank E on Feb 16, 2010 12:13 AM EST up reply actions  

He's a rookie.

If we were winning games cuz of him….he’d be better then Lebron James as a rookie….

Of course he’s gonna get DNP-CD’s….Pringles rotation are pretty peculiar and I doubt a rookie’s gonna crack them.

A Max player’s not gonna have much choice…they ain’t gonna win no championship next season with just 2 max players with a bunch of crap player around them.

Bye, AP :(

by FreeBradshaw on Feb 16, 2010 12:21 AM EST up reply actions  

yeah

thats how rookies are supposed to develop, give them DNP-CD’s!

by Frank E on Feb 16, 2010 12:23 AM EST up reply actions  

talk to Pringles about that...

Jordan Hill’s shown that he deserves minutes. Every single game he shows that.

Bye, AP :(

by FreeBradshaw on Feb 16, 2010 12:26 AM EST up reply actions  

my poiint

my point is that if the knicks were interested in having jordan hill a core componant of their team theyd be playing him. Instead theyve been showcasing Jeffries all season for a trade. Moving his salary is much more important than developing Jordan Hill.

by Frank E on Feb 16, 2010 12:31 AM EST up reply actions  

what?

they drafted Hill for a reason…and it sure as hell wasn’t to sweeten a Jared Jeffires trade.

Core component? Jeffries, Harrington, Chandler Lee get most of the minutes up from cuz they’re the vets and that’s who Pringles plays. Why? Dunno….probably cuz he thinks they’re gonna get the team to the playoffs this year.

He’s not gonna bench these guys to play Hill. Why?

?

Bye, AP :(

by FreeBradshaw on Feb 16, 2010 12:40 AM EST up reply actions  

missed the point

The Knicks have showed all season that they are more dedicated in showcasing Jeffries to move him than they are in developing Jordan Hill

by Frank E on Feb 16, 2010 12:30 PM EST up reply actions  

Good players want to play with other good players

Once players know you have one really good player, they’re more likely to want to come. KG / Ray Allen; Anybody / J-Kidd (in his prime), etc. If NY has the money to get two max players, recruiting will be MUCH easier. And you can’t wait until 2011; all the best players will be gone by then. Get 2 max guys in 2010, then let Curry’s contract expire and land a good 2nd tier player in 2011. Add in Ill WIll, Gallo, and you have a nice team. If he pulls this off, DW should get Executive of the Year. Hands down.

by AtlKnicks on Feb 16, 2010 12:43 AM EST up reply actions  

No TD!

I don’t want to watch him become a defensive stopper for the Rockets! Plus, what would I do with my ‘Do What Toney Douglas Do’ T-shirt?

by fuhry on Feb 16, 2010 3:13 PM EST up reply actions  

pick

if they want to swap 2011 and the 2012 is lottery protected ill do it

by Frank E on Feb 16, 2010 12:24 AM EST up reply actions  

Good players want to play with other good players

Once players know you have one really good player, they’re more likely to want to come. KG / Ray Allen; Anybody / J-Kidd (in his prime), etc. If NY has the money to get two max players, recruiting will be MUCH easier. And you can’t wait until 2011; all the best players will be gone by then. Get 2 max guys in 2010, then let Curry’s contract expire and land a good 2nd tier player in 2011. Add in Ill WIll, Gallo, and you have a nice team. If he pulls this off, DW should get Executive of the Year. Hands down.

by AtlKnicks on Feb 16, 2010 12:44 AM EST up reply actions  

the Celtics had Paul Piece

the Knicks don’t have that. Allen went there in the trade…then KG went there.

They don’t have Rondo, Perkins, Powe, Davis either. Those guys developed with the big 3 there…but they don’t sniff a championship if they don’t have those role players.

You don’t get cheap role players like that by having cap space and signing FA’s. You get cheap role players on rookie contracts…by drafting them.

We’re giving a cheap role player up (tho he could develop into more), and then there’s the other picks.

Executive of the year…maybe.

Isiah Thomas part 2…also, maybe.

Bye, AP :(

by FreeBradshaw on Feb 16, 2010 12:49 AM EST up reply actions  

houston fan here

thought you guys would maybe find this funny:

http://www.xtranormal.com/watch/6124105/

Wafer . . . again. (Marv Albert, HOU v. CLE Feb 2009)
-one of the FEW at Toyota Center who has the Wafer jersey

by olivarezq1 on Feb 16, 2010 12:35 AM EST reply actions  

absolutely hysterical.

when he said the halal cart on 53rd n 6th i lost it. hahahahahaha.

by tz88 on Feb 16, 2010 1:44 AM EST up reply actions  

enough on Rubio

we know you would trade the whole team for Ricky Rubio. He is not a Knick. He is with Minnesota and will be until he isn’t. They arent stupid either. He wont come cheap by any means and he probably wont even live up to the hype around him.

"you're the Rod Thorn in my Chris Bosh side."

by Chris Child's Fist on Feb 16, 2010 10:44 AM EST up reply actions  

wont come cheap?

do u think the supposed deal for tmac is cheap? 2 future first rounders and our current first round pick. thats 3 first rounders. all im saying is if we’re going to give up that much for a player then get a point guard with potential, the most glaring need on this team. i would like to see rubio on our team but i’d settle for jus an upgrade over dudu.

CHUUUUUUUUUUUUUCH

by IB on Feb 16, 2010 1:33 PM EST up reply actions  

i would never give up that

for rubio. i wouldnt even give up one first rounder.. he’s unproven and this season he has regressed in terms of productivity in europe

by semsemma on Feb 16, 2010 1:35 PM EST up reply actions  

21 mins a game and he averages 5 assist...dudu averages

in 21 mins a game rubo averages 5 ast 1.5 stls 11.8ppg
in comparison dudu averages 6.3 ast 1 stl 7.8 ppg in 33 mins
my point is potential and i dont want to hear anything about europeans coming over here to play dont always live up to potential because not everyone here lives up to potential. if you saw the olympics he can ball thats all you need to know. he might take a while to gain stamina for an 82 game season but that natural for any player and hes only 19. and if tmac is worth 3 first rounders you cant tell me rubio isnt worth 3 first rounders

CHUUUUUUUUUUUUUCH

by IB on Feb 16, 2010 1:52 PM EST up reply actions  

The European game IS different

and Rubio is playing well there, and yeah, hes very young. But a lot of guys have come over through huge hype and sucked it up. Sure Rubio was excellent at the Olympics. You know who else tore us up at the World Champs? Carlos Arroyo. How is he doing these days? You just don’t know.

But also, Minnesota isnt shopping Rubio. And TMac is 2 picks, not 3. One pick is a swap.

"you're the Rod Thorn in my Chris Bosh side."

by Chris Child's Fist on Feb 16, 2010 6:44 PM EST up reply actions  

of course we want to ditch No Can Duhon.

And yeah I would be fine with Rubio. But I’m not annointing him any sort of PG savior until he is in the NBA and playing and playing ridiculously good. Im done with hype.

"you're the Rod Thorn in my Chris Bosh side."

by Chris Child's Fist on Feb 16, 2010 6:45 PM EST up reply actions  

tmac is a good gamble

there is a reason jordan hill isn’t getting any burn..he doesn’t fit in dantonii’s system..or dantoni just doesn’t like him..whatever the case, he wont play as long as pringles is the head coach…so why not take a risk with tmac..a former all star, one of the most dominating players at his position…its only guaranteed for the remainder of the season, and if we like what we see we keep him…..but i do think there are way too many draft picks included in this deal

<follow me @theinfamousazad

by zlander on Feb 16, 2010 1:24 AM EST reply actions  

This isn't about T-Mac. It's about getting rid of JJ

for cap space. If we weren’t getting rid of JJ, I don’t think we would be doing this trade

by AtlKnicks on Feb 16, 2010 1:29 AM EST up reply actions  

pringles has a history of not playing rookies

and he has been playing him recently maybe not that many minutes but he has played, what nobody is mentioning is pringles has trust issues with rookies. thats why he goes back to veterans when the game is on the line

CHUUUUUUUUUUUUUCH

by IB on Feb 16, 2010 1:35 PM EST up reply actions  

in the limited minutes j-hill has played he seemingly as garnered huge +/- stats and has put up significant #s. i think this is a combo of a rookie giving a damn and the knicks having absolutely no heart. one iota of effort will seem like a lock. apply this same mentality to david lee. the kid is nearly averaging 20/11! that’s nearly top50 of all-time type of numbers. i think this trade goes through if the 2012 pick is lottery protected.

here’s a different question. do you pull the trigger on a deal that gets rid of eddy curry if it means the Cock must go as well?

by raj m on Feb 16, 2010 2:43 AM EST reply actions  

no to gallo but yes to lee

wouldnt let go of gallo to get rid of curry. but would trade david lee. because i care way too much about this damn team i found a deal that works and could make some sense given that the mavs are in all in mode and generally dont shy away from spending ridiculous amounts of money:

david lee and eddy curry for erick dampier (contract not guaranteed next year), jj barea, and tim thomas.

by ibnyc on Feb 16, 2010 6:50 AM EST up reply actions  

Hate it...

The problems I (and most of us) see with the Knicks are no PG and too many “scorers” (w/o the effort guys/role-players). As much as I started the year not liking JJ, he’s grown on me at least a little bit. He may not be worth the $7M we pay him, but he at least knows his role and gives the effort. Chemistry helps win games obviously and once Harrington and Hughes are gone… our chemistry sky-rockets.

Back about JJ – With Chandler, Gallo, Harrington, Lee, N8, Hughes… even TD…. we have guys that are “scorers”. JJ is really our only player who you can point to that his forte ISN’T scoring and is more about effort.

With his contract expiring next year, let’s let our youth develop, maybe get one medium/big piece this summer and find a pure point guard this offseason (trade) or next (FA/trade). Unfortunately, what we REALLY need isn’t available on the FA market this summer… a pure PG or a defensive/rebounding C (could Darko really not fill that role? Luv to see him at least be given the chance).

Also, if we had consistent, decent pure PG play… how much better would we even be just THIS year? Playoffs likely? Why not let our current youth develop and add a PG somehow?

Sorry for the ramble, just my 2c.

by Zhantee on Feb 16, 2010 11:43 AM EST reply actions  

2 thoughts

The staff have evaluated Hill for more than 6 months and therfore must have formed an opinion regarding his ability. They know he can jump and run, but my guess is that they feel that he can not shoot. In short, They are convinced that he will be a journeyman.

My thought regarding TMac is the same as many posts. If he has fully recovered from his injury, why has he not played for the Rockets? Answer- The staff has determined that he no longer the same player.

Why do the Knicks want him? Answer- because they want to get rid of Jeffries and his contract. They also want to unload Hughes, who is a pain in the ass and either
Harrington- no great loss- or Hill- a bad draft choice.

by Vincent C on Feb 16, 2010 12:29 PM EST reply actions  

Why this deal has to be done

Walsh has stuck to his plan for 2 years now, and thus far has not sacrficed even a smidgen of our future in clearing the cap he has. He can’t go half way, it’s either you’re all in or you’re out. If all thats sacrificed in clearing 50mil in cap and ultimately completing all of the original goals is giving up Jordan Hill and a protected pick, than I say we made out great.

LeBron is the best player in the league. These opportunities come around once in a generation. Why dilly dally about the prospects of this happening. We’ve got to go for it 100%. If we get this guy, with a cast, we’re title contenders for the next decade. Let that sit for a little bit.

The risk involved in giving up the picks is that we could miss out on LeBron. But I’d bet my ass that the chances of those picks turning out to be an NBA star are more extreme than us landing LeBron. Even if the picks unprotected, based on last years lottery we had a 8.3% chance of landing the #1 pick. We certainly have a better than 8.3% chance of landing LeBron if this trade happens. And even if we got a good player in the draft theres no chance theyre as good as LeBron.

What it comes down to if we don’t pull this trade off than most likely LeBron stays, we sign a lesser (Bosh, Joe Johnson) to a max deal, build a decent team, and we are destined for a 3-4 seed for the next 5 years. I say we go for the chance at being destined to win titles for the next 10 years. The difference between being where we are now and being a 3-4 seed doesn’t do too much for me. The chance at winning titles is everything to me.

by Frank E on Feb 16, 2010 12:48 PM EST reply actions  

I agree

I don’t like giving up Hill and I don’t like giving up first rounders. But getting the space is big. You have to take a gamble sometimes. They didn’t take the gamble in the draft and took Hill over Brandon Jennings. But I think this would be a decent gamble. You’re gambling that Hill isn’t going to be a star, and you’re gambling that we’ll be able to improve our team enough so that the draft picks we’re giving up are late first rounders.

I think it’s a pretty good gamble, but if I were Walsh I’d take it to the limit trying to get them to do the deal without the 2012 first rounder.

by fuhry on Feb 16, 2010 3:22 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Posting and Toasting: Blogging the Knicks Robin Hood-Style Since 2007

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Steakdog_small
knick fans playing hi-low offense/defense
Small
Why Clyde Frazier is Banned in China
Bernard-king-new-york-knicks-crown-garden-autographed-photograph-3364338_small
Knicks Reels Weekly Issue #6 - Better Lin Than Never!
8_small
The Legend of Jeremy Lin
Jorts6_small
Mann-Mann

Recent FanPosts

Woman_sitting-web_small
The Mighty Lin
19sticks_small
Will Melo's Return Make the Knicks Worse?
Jets-patriots-playoffs_small
Presenting: The Jeremy Lin Mulan Knicks Anthem
Small
Knicks contending this year
Small
Things are looking up
Small
12 Years... It's About Time
Small
Game Recap
Small
Lin for MVP
Small
Would you trade Jeremy Lin for John Wall?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >