Cruel, Cruel Summer: Our Free Agent Options at Center
The trade deadline came and went this year, shuffling out old, bad players (Hughes, Jeffries) as well as young energy guys (Robinson, Hill) and getting in return more young energy guys (Walker, Rodriguez) as well as a 30-year-old, two time scoring champion who, medically speaking, is suffering from a "bad everything." Why would we acquire this glorified voodoo doll, you ask? Young moolah, baby!
Let's start the show!
(Note: This article is quite lengthy. Just giving fair warning)
Because of these trades, we’ll have very little financial obligation next year bringing our overall payroll to around 17 million (everybody say it with me; "Thanks Eddy Curry!"). Cunningly assuming we exercise the $800,000 option on Bill Walker ("Thanks Donnie!"), we will have bodies to put on the floor in the form of:
- Bill Walker
- Eddy Curry
One of these guys seems out of place, but I can’t tell which. Hmmm…
Let’s look at it by position:
Gallinari: "Hey, I’m a 6’10" Leo from Italy. I like walks on the beach, tight jeans, women, man as well as help defense and pressure situations. I can conceivably play the 2-guard in a piss-poor, ill-advised, hyphen-filled line-up, but that would be a bad idea. Anyone who suggests this is riding my dick a little too hard, which is quite a feat! I am best suited for the small-forward position, especially considering my history of back woes, but get me an athletic, shot-blocking big man and give me another year of weight training and you can slide me to the four!"
Gallo: 3, 4
Wilson Chandler: "What’s up? I’m a 6’8" Taurus from Michigan. I like tattoos and bowling, but I don’t like confrontation or any general emotion. I have been known to play at the 2-guard but, like Mr. Gallinari, I am bad there. I am a DIY defender who has been stuck on a bad team for a few years, so I’ve never realized my defensive potential. I am best fitted for the small-forward position for different reasons from Gallinari; he is the Yin to my Yang. While he excels at shooting the basketball and passing, I am a middling shooter with virtually no 3-point shot. I make up for it in drives to the hoop (or at least I should!), and, like Gallo, I am excellent at drawing fouls. I can be slid over to the four if there is a special shooter playing the three, and have not created a problem for anyone on any team in my whole life."
Chandler: 3, 4
Bill Walker: "What it is? I’m a 6’6" Libra from West Virginia. I like to take pisses and I don’t like to be benched. I can dunk like no one’s fucking business and am more of an untapped resource than ANWR. I am a 2-guard with ball skills and dastardly talents around the rim, but I can also spot up and shoot the ball. I’m improving. Oh yeah; and I’m so athletic it should be illegal. Call me a shooting guard, but if you want me to be your small-forward in a small-ball line-up? I probably wouldn’t say no. Holla."
Walker: 2, 3
Toney Douglas: "Toney Douglas is a 6’1" Pisces from Georgia. Toney is the Ghostiest in his spare time, but also enjoys locking down guards who think they some shit. Toney spends much of his work time developing, and has no true weakness in his game. While he does excel at the dribble-drive, he can spot up for a three or drive-and-kick to teammates. It’s just what Toney Douglas do. Toney can play either guard spot because he’s a Ghost-of-all-trades. Let Toney spin bitches."
Douglas: 1, 2
Eddy Curry: "I’m Eddy Curry. I have a terrible track-record with damn near everything, and could never stay healthy because I could never stay in shape. I want to get this paper then bounce."
Curry: Bench, sign-and-trade scenario
Everyone caught up?
Good, now we can start talking about the meat-and-potatoes of this article: Need.
With these four (actual) players, we could march out a line-up of:
Toney Douglas
Bill Walker
Wilson Chandler
Danilo Gallinari
TBA
Now, that line-up would not win any games, but it’s a very young, competent squad filled with either strong back-ups or developing starters. Let’s operate under the assumption that every player will get minutes next year, no matter what (sidebar: Wilson Chandler is the most likely to get traded out of the four, but we’re going to operate under the assumption that he sticks with the Knicks because wild speculation is dangerous). If this is the case, we still have needs in every area. Let’s do them in order.
Center
There is no such thing as a good professional basketball team without a competent player at the center position. Hell, most of the real good ones have two (Lakers, Magic, etc.)! But this roster lacks one, and David Lee is out of place defending them. For this reason, let’s look at our options at center for next year, with their ages parenthetically noted.
Unrestricted:
- Eddy Curry (I would rather die)
- Jason Collins (31)
- Randolph Morris [Let Dolph Spin! (24)]
- Tyson Chandler (27)
- Nazr Mohammed (32)
- Big Snacks
- Brad Miller (33)
- Shaquille O’Neal (62)
- Johan Petro (24)
- Ben Wallace (35)
- Yao Ming [not happening (29)]
- D.J. Mbenga (29)
- Jamaal Magloire (31)
- Jermaine O’Neal (31)
- Primoz Brezec (30)
- Jonathan Bender (29)
- Francisco Elson (34)
- Jarron Collins (31)
- Marcus Camby (35)
- Ian Mahinmi (23)
- Rasho Nesterovic (33)
- Fabricio Oberto (34)
- Brendan Haywood (30)
Restricted:
- Hilton Armstrong (25)
- Joel Anthony (27)
- Nathan Jawai (23)
- Aaron Gray (25)
- Kyrylo Fesenko (23)
And that’s the list. I would type up the 2011 list due to its significance, but I figure we should cross that bridge when we come to it. Moving on verily.
What should the requirements be to narrow the list? I have subjectively decided to take every player off the list who is full-blown terrible at defense, as well as anyone whose last name is "Collins." Additionally, 33 years old or higher, and you’re gone. I know there will be clamoring for a stronger youth movement, which makes sense, but it should also be understood that this is a particularly shitty batch of young centers on the market, and age should not be equated with eventual worth. Having said that, the list should now read:
- Randolph Morris
- Tyson Chandler
- Nazr Mohammed
- Johan Petro
- D.J. Mbenga
- Jamaal Magloire
- Jermaine O’Neal
- Primoz Brezec
- Ian Mahinmi
- Hilston Armstrong
- Joel Anthony
- Nathan Jawai
- Aaron Gray
- Kyrylo Fesenko
- Brendan Haywood
To further narrow the list, let’s take away the guys who could never start for a professional basketball team, as we are looking for a starter and not just a patchwork back-up.
The list now reads:
- Tyson Chandler
- Brendan Haywood
- Nazr Mohammed
- Jermaine O’Neal
- Ian Mahinmi
- Kyrylo Fesenko
Not as bad as it could be. We trimmed the fat and ended up with six names; four are full-blown veterans with health exclamation points, two are young centers who just need a chance. Let’s break it down.
Tyson Chandler: 27 years old, 569 games wear ‘n’ tear, 7’1"
Chris Paul’s bro from a couple years back, Tyson Chandler has been hurt the past couple of years, even failing a physical that would have been the finishing touch (pause) on a trade to OKC. His body of work is as stellar as possible for a wire-thin string bean; very solid defender, able shot-blocker, decent defender, middling back-to-the-basket game, alley-oop supreme. He has kept his FG% in the mid-50s and low-60s the past few years, which should be a prerequisite for any center.
The bad thing about Chandler is almost solely his injury history. The second overall pick in 2001 has played in about half of each of the past two seasons, but seems to be healthy now. For how long is a mystery.
Chandler is an excellent character guy and has appeared in relatively few games (by comparison, LeBron James has played in 535 games). He is currently paid $11 million per year, though he would be highly unlikely to receive that type of money on the open market this su mmer.
My opinion: Tyson Chandler should lead the race for Knicks Starting Center in 2010, in my opinion. He has battled injuries the past few years, but seems to be healthy and would be come relatively cheap (pause). If he can be had for a couple years at $5 million per year or so, I would not protest.
Brendan Haywood: 30 years old, 591 games wear 'n' tear, 7'0"
A defensive force who spent his years wallowing in the Wizards mess (they were alright for a couple years, I know, but still), he was recently liberated and sent along with Caron Butler to the Mavericks, where he has been thrust into the spotlight and exposed for the excellent defender he is. He is only 30 years old and is pretty much exactly what we'd be looking for.
The only question mark? Well, you could nitpick and say health because he was hurt almost all of last year, but I'd say the bigger question is money; how much is he going to command on the open market this summer? He currently earns about $6 million and will probably get a raise, depending on how he plays in the playoffs.
My opinion: Definitely a guy to keep an eye on, he can pull down 10 boards a game and, like I said, defends with the best of them. Pending finance, he may be the best option of all.
Nazr Mohammed: 32 years old, 692 games wear ‘n’ tear, 6’9"
Nazr Mohammed has played for nearly every team the NBA has to offer. He is an undersized center because he’s sort of slow and isn’t the most able scorer or defender in the world. The reason I included him on this list is because he was having a great season up until getting hurt recently, although that would do more to dissuade New York brass than anything, seeing as he would come at a mirage money for stepping it up in a contract year. Being 32 can’t help, either. He's a role player through and through, which are always useful in today's NBA.
My opinion: I wouldn’t be too happy with a Nazr Mohammed signing, seeing as he already played in New York and was traded for Malik Rose (seriously). He has looked pretty good in the few times I saw him this year, but barely making my age-cut at 32 and getting hurt recently make him unappealing. Despite the shit-talking, Mohammed would not have made this list if I didn't think he was a capable NBA starting center. Something to keep in mind.
Jermaine O’Neal: 31 years old, 853 games wear ‘n’ tear, 6’11"
For some reason, Jermaine O’Neal will get attention this offseason. He is having a an okay year for a 31 year old with an alarming amount of wear and tear who makes $23 million per year, but is probably going to have to shut it down relatively soon due to his physical style of play (Ben Wallace started to fail physically at around this point in his career, just to use as a barometer).
O’Neal has always been an excellent defender, which is the main reason I put him on this list. He was an elite defender for about 10 of his 13 years before beginning to decay with age. He, like Wallace, still has some defensive prowess left in the tank due to smarts and size, and I suspect he might try a little harder if he were playing on a truly good team (R.I.P. 2004 Pacers).
My opinion: I know I’ll get crucified for it, but I wouldn’t be too averse to a deal for Jermaine O’Neal. He’s got a pretty good midrange game, and if you’ve seen him play this year at all, you can tell he’s still got an okay first step when playing face-up basketball. He’d be an able defender for probably about two more years, and if he could be enticed to come to New York for about $4 or 5 million a year, I’d have to think about it before I flipped out. I would not give him more than a two year deal, however; and I suspect that would be a deal-breaker for him.
Now to go over the young projects.
Ian Mahinmi: 23 years old, 17 games wear ‘n’ tear, 6’11"
Don’t know a whole lot about this guy. He was drafted in the first round of the 2005 draft out of France by the Spurs, which actually speaks volumes to me. He seems like a big motherfucker, and he’s only 23. He could be had for extremely cheap and would be another name to put on the roster.
My opinion: Sure, why not? The last two syllables of his last name are "In me." Seriously, here?
Kyrylo Fesenko: 23 years old, 67 games wear ‘n’ tear, 7’1"
This guy is gigantic. He is 300 pounds and pretty good around the rim. I’m pretty sure he’s a foul magnet, but stuff like that goes away with age a lot of the time (see Noah, Joakim). He has gotten extremely spotty minutes all year for the Jazz, but their brass seemed to be high on him for the past few years, so he’s obviously got a lot of potential. Similar story to Mahinmi to me, just needs a shot in the league to see if he’s a bust or not.
My opinion: Not as big on this guy (pause, no pun intended) as I am on Mahinmi, but he could be another body on the cheap (pause), so it’s obviously in the cards.
That’s what I have for now guys. If you’ve read this far, you really need to get a life or do a better job at work. As for me, I’ll continue to think about nothing but the New York Knicks and talk to you guys about it. Lemme know what you think, or if there’s anyone major I missed for the 2010 market, in your opinion. If you say Aaron Gray, I’ll get Seth to warn you. I have this power.
Piece.
50 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
It should be said
That if the Knicks sign Tyson Chandler, they will have a reunion of the ill-fated Tyson Chandler / Eddy Curry combo for at least part of a season. This fills me with dread. What about Brendan Haywood?
I added Haywood. Re-Vote!
Haywood’s going to command the most money by far guys. Just food for thought.
<3 mahinmi
I’d also be interested to see if walsh is interested in any of the big fellas (varnado, jordan) that might fall to the second round of the draft.
by Seth on Mar 12, 2010 5:04 PM EST via mobile reply actions
We need to get lucky there
Usually guys that are 6’11" or taller move up unexpectedly in the draft… while a guy like Varnado, who, if he was a couple of inches taller would probably be a first rounder, might drop to us. I think it’s possible in D’antoni’s system to play a guy like that at the 5. Sometimes you can make up a couple of inches with leaping ability and wingspan…. We’re going to have to get creative as there’s not much in the way of clear options out there….
After watching Varnado take Mississippi St.to the conference finals
I dont think he will slip to 2nd round. The guy is the NCAA career blocks leader. He gets blocks like PGs get assists.
"you're the Rod Thorn in my Chris Bosh side."
by Chris Child's Fist on Mar 13, 2010 11:44 PM EST up reply actions
good stuff
i also wouldn’t have a problem with o’neal on a “good” contract. the rest of those guys a resounding no. however i voted “other” because haywood has to be the #1 choice.
ughh the kharma of chandler & curry on the same team for even part of the season scares the crap out of me.
i voted other personally
wonder how many of those votes are for camby
not high on any of these names, quite honestly
i really don’t know what to do about our center situation. i mean, the team clearly needs a shot-blocker and a rebounder, but he won’t get minutes unless he can really run the floor and finish at the basket. d’antoni’s preferences and the team’s needs put together means we need an all-star at the 5 spot.
i guess the best option is mahinmi, he’s the only one with a chance to really develop into a great, mobile center. but generally speaking, i think donnie should just draft a center at the top of the 2nd round, or late 1st if we buy a pick and/or move up.
by latrell chokewell on Mar 12, 2010 5:23 PM EST reply actions
I tend to agree.
Though Haywood’s obviously worth a look at the right price, and a healthy Tyson Chandler would do wonders for the locker room. He’s a pro’s pro.
I like Haywood
but I think Mahinmi’s upside, especially as a tall dude in a Pringles system, would be very high.
Haywood would be a good vet presence, both actually would be good (the Frenchie probably isn’t gonna cost much!)
Chandler’s a good player, be nice to have a TyChan on the team…he’s too injury prone tho. Obviously if they got say, Chandler and Haywood…that’d be ideal.
Master of the squeegee
by FreeBradshaw on Mar 12, 2010 6:24 PM EST up reply actions
out of the options..
ill pick fesenko..bcuz of his upside..chandler is too injury prone..so is everyone else on that list..honestly i think we will see marcus camby in a knicks uniform (again) next year
<follow me @theinfamousazad
Man a young solid big man would be awesome but
who else we bring in can determine whether or not that we can pursuade the free agent graduation class of 2010 and 2011 to come play for the Knickerbockers. So young unproven guys might be a turnoff!
bring back Marcus Camby!!!
he has matured into a very solid defensive player. sure he was soft back then, but wouldn’t it be great for him to return to the team that brought us to our most recent finals? i only want him for sentimental reasons, lol.
i don't want any of these guys at all
i definitely don’t want stodgy russian dudes in dank filthy sweaters taking up all the seats at the garden because some jerk named krkrlylko feshtanko happens to be the ninth man off the bench.
so, although i voted other, i guess i’ll stick with mahinmi. because i’m fwench.
twitter.com/aighttho
http://aightthen.tumblr.com/
Mahinmi seems the best bet if we can't afford Haywood
Haywood is the most dependable of the batch but will likely cost the most as well. If we are targeting 2 max contracts would we have the money to get him?
No way we should go with Chandler. His numbers have gone way down the last two years which is a bad sign for anyone over 30 and he’s just under 10 pts and 10 rebounds per 36 minutes with a PER of a meager 10.6 this year. He is not the same Chandler of two years ago.
The dark horse that I would want the Knicks to go after is definitely Mahinmi who, although he has gotten few minutes in his two years, has played extremely well in them. He is young, talented, good height, is from Europe (Knicks could use some more fundamentals-based players), and would likely give you the most for your dollar.
Obviously his playing time has been to little to hastily jump all over him but they are All-Star level impressive per 36 minutes: 22.2 pts, 11.5 rb, 2.7 blks, .633 FG%, and .769 FT% to go along with a 21.7 PER. His cost should be below mid-level and if he doesn’t work out it won’t be a big financial burden, but if he can play at just 75% his career rate it would be a huge bargain.
Any chance
Ike Austin will come out of retirement?
I think Tyson Chandler would be a mistake
He is turning into the new Marcus Camby, but not as good a defender. He never misses just ONE game…its in bunches of 5+. We should have learned our lesson by now in paying for centers who are injury prone. Camby, Curry, James???
I’m ok with bringing back Marcus Camby though, but prob 1-2 years max.
Haywood might not be entirely expensive, but I think he should absolutely top the list. He doesn’t command the ball on offense either. Just the center we need. Low post banger, rebounder and can block shots.
"you're the Rod Thorn in my Chris Bosh side."
by Chris Child's Fist on Mar 13, 2010 11:49 PM EST reply actions
Sign & Trade
A.Stoudemire is going to make 17m next season.
Signing D.Lee to 8m and adding E.Curry and his 11m contract give us a sign and trade for Amare.
So if this goes down along with signing F/A J.Johnson we will have the following lineup.
PG/T.Douglas
SG/J.Johnson
SF/W.Chandler
PF/A.Stoudemire
C/??? (
(Buy two high picks and draft C.Aldrich & D.Pittman)
Bench Rotation Players
PG/S.Rodriguez
SG/B.Walker
SG-SF/T.McGrady
SF-PF/D.Gallinari
Look for some more bangers for the bench.
I could feel that.
Think is……..what are we gaining by getting Amare with no Lee?
Amare might look the part a bit more…but I dunno how much better he is then Lee..but he’ll be making a lot more.
Master of the squeegee
by FreeBradshaw on Mar 14, 2010 11:48 AM EDT up reply actions
Answer: Flexibility
Replacing Lee with Amare, allows the Knicks to shift Amare to center if need be because of his size. Something that kills Lee on defense because he is so small.
I don’t think Lee is going to want to stay, and for a D’Antoni team, a good lineup might be Douglas, Johnson, Chandler, Gallo, Stoudemire. 2 Long Range Shooters, a Lights out Mid Range Shooter, a Slasher, and an Alley oop/Pick and Roll assassin. And Chandler can be bait if need be and Walker can slide in at the 2 and Johnson slides to the 4 (he is 6’7)
Of the Centers, I’ve been checking this out as well. I think the Knicks best option is if Joel pryzbilla uses his ETO, he has the best rebounding rate in the league, and could be the deensive stalworth at center that a D’Antoni led team needs to get over the top.
And for the love of everything NO CHANDLER, OKC made the smartest move of the Durant error, by NOT getting Chandler. Nothing kills a team with hopes of building a championship like someone who is never on the floor. Chandler only worked in Chicago because he only had to play on Defense and throw in some Alley oop dunks, he had Curry (back in his health 2 years) to do everything on the offensive ends, which let him rest and not strain his body. He’s like McGrady the mileage got to him really fast. It should also be noteed that there is no way in hell Chandler is going to be a free agent because he’s not going to give up the money on his contract (he has an ETO) knowing his injury history won’t let him recoupe such a high number in the future.
If they had Pryzbilla
or someone like that (Haywood) yea, Amare makes sense. Lee does to then
I dunno why Amare’s defense gets a free pass over D-Lee’s. Amare is pretty much just as bad and really not all that much of an upgrade overall, especially when considering how much more cap room Amare would tie up.
Master of the squeegee
by FreeBradshaw on Mar 14, 2010 1:43 PM EDT up reply actions
plus Amare seems to be pretty injury prone as well.
I’d rather have Lee and Haywood/Pryzbilla (or both…)
Master of the squeegee
by FreeBradshaw on Mar 14, 2010 1:44 PM EDT up reply actions
I think its really just depth
Since Hill is gone, now there is no one on the bench at C, so having Amare with say a Pryzbilla or Haywood, if one of them goes down, you arn’t stuck without the size at the 5.
And don’t get me wrong Amare is a bad defender, same as lee, his value is in his size for his position. But I’d be fine with Lee in place of Amare if Haywood or Pryzbilla could be locked in.
Wait a second
You are against getting Tyson Chandler because of his injury history, but your guy to get instead is Joel Pzrzrzvjbikllllllaa? This is the same Joel Pryzbxhsgdhfbilla who has out with a major injury (ruptured patella tendon – knee) which has a 6-8 month recovery and he just slipped and re-ruptured the same tendon and knee. I like the guy, but he has never been a consistent option. Plus he is making $7.4 Mil next year. He shouldn’t even be on our radar.
"you're the Rod Thorn in my Chris Bosh side."
by Chris Child's Fist on Mar 15, 2010 3:30 PM EDT up reply actions
D.Lee/Overrated!
D.Leeis overrated, becuase of the D’Antoni system he has numbers in scoring and rebounding.
Example, he sets up for his jump shot because centers are to big and will not go out and defend him. He scores at will along with giving up just as many points because he is shorter then most at center.
Now if he goes to PF, then he will have trouble scoring because most PF’s can watch him.
This leads to another problem, he will also have problems defending at PF because most PF’s can go by him.
So to sum it up he is at best a second unit PF on a good team.
Just ask yourself, why this year the Knicks don’t play him at PF and just put bigas in the middle to take up space.
The reason is he will get expose and then there is no worth.
A.Stoudemire on the other hand can give you twenty every night along with cleaning the boards. Whn the night you need and extra ten he can do that also. His defense is also suspect, however, with Douglas, Johnson and Chandler three guys whom can man up it won’t be a problem. D.Lee again is a product of the D’Antoni system. No team really wants him.
-50
Lee is well worth hanging onto. He would do just fine at his natural PF spot as long as we have an actual Center.
"you're the Rod Thorn in my Chris Bosh side."
by Chris Child's Fist on Mar 15, 2010 3:32 PM EDT up reply actions
you must've not seen David Lee pre-Pringles
Given that, you probably missed the fact that Lee couldn’t hit a jump shot for his life before this year.
…Pringles didn’t help Lee make that shot. Lee did.
Master of the squeegee
by FreeBradshaw on Mar 15, 2010 5:20 PM EDT up reply actions
and why don’t you riddle for all of us, how exactly Amare isn’t a product of a Pringles system?
Amare was OK when Terry Porter was the coach (non-Pringles style).
Now with Alvin Gentry there…Amare’s “back” (Pringles style).
Master of the squeegee
by FreeBradshaw on Mar 15, 2010 5:24 PM EDT up reply actions
I get the feeling that Cole Aldrich will be the new Big Country
or Greg Ostertag. Neither of which seem like good ideas for NY.
I’m all about finding a way into the middle of 1st Round though.
"you're the Rod Thorn in my Chris Bosh side."
by Chris Child's Fist on Mar 15, 2010 3:22 PM EDT up reply actions
C.Aldrich/Nets Needs
C.Aldrich would be ideal for the Nets as backup to B.Lopez.
Coming in for 15 to 20 minutes a game based on fouls, injury, lack of effort and breather.
He bangs and that is what you want from your back up center along with the fact he wil get foul and make his free throws at 80%.
You need two in the middle to win the NBA Championship.
Orlando——Howard/Gortat
L.A.L————Bynum/Gasol/Odom
Boston——-Kendricks/Garnett
Just think about it.
B.Lopez/D.Cousins
C.Aldrich/K.Humphries
Thats a lot of vvery young beef up front.
Aldrich
Will be taken in the lottery. No way the Nets take a backup center with their lottery pick.
Aldrich
I ment to say this guy could be backup on the Brooklyn Nets by polaying solid minutes behind B.Lopez.
he is a starter and also could be a solid pick for the Knicks if they want to pony up and buy a top ten pick for him.
the guy can also play PF next to B.Lopez if needed.
2010 Knicks Projection:
PG/T.Douglas
SG/J.Johnson F/A
SF/W.Chandler
PF/A.Stoudemire Sign& Trade with D.Lee/E.Curry
C/C.Aldrich & or D.Pittman Buy Picks through the draft for cash 5/6million
Its better then signing overprice F/A
Bench:
SG/B.Walker SF/T.McCrady PF/D.Gallinari PG/S.Rodriguez
With the starting five you have four solid defenders in Douglas/Johnson/Chandler/Aldrich along with three twenty plus scorers in Johnson/Chandler/Stoudemire.
NOT A VERY BAD SCENARIO FOR FIVE YEARS.
I vote for Chandler solely because that's exactly what I've done in NBA2k10
I base all my basketball decisions off that game. We should also trade for JR Smith, do our damdest to trade for terrence williams apparently. He’s a beast waiting to blow.
Marcus Camby and Brad Miller...
are easily the best veteran, short term options for the Knicks.
I don’t think Camby is likely to be re-signed by the Blazers, and he loved playing in NY (and we loved him!). Still a defensive/rebounding powerhouse, Camby’s got a lot of life in him. I see no reason he can’t pull a Deke and play until 40 if he wants.
I’m not as big a fan of Miller, but he is a hard worker who plays physical defense. He has a polished high post offensive game and is a respectable passer for a big man, so he “should be” a perfect fit for Mike D (I also said the same thing about Darko). Miller is an ex-Walsh guy, so that bodes well for him.
FYI – Tyson Chandler is not a FA this summer. He has a 12 million player option, which he would be a fool to walk away from coming off an injury plagued season. Joel Pryzbilla is in the same boat, injured but with a 7 million player option for next season.
For low cost, defensive oriented backups I like Etan Thomas, Stephen Hunter and Joel Anthony.

by 












