Nate Robinson never did get that $1 million.
Nothing major here, but this curious bit of trivia from the eminent Henry Abbott is of interest (tips of the hat to Alan Hahn and Jay "The" King:
Boston Celtics guard Nate Robinson was benched for two games near the end of the regular season, and it cost him $1 million, while saving the team twice that amount.
A clause in Robinson's contract calls for him to make a $1 million bonus if he both played in at least 58 games and made the playoffs this season. Robinson's Celtics are in the postseason but he played in 56 games. As a result, the Celtics saved the $1 million they would have paid Robinson -- equivalent to a quarter of his reported annual salary -- and an additional $1 million they would have owed in luxury tax to the NBA (most of which would have been distributed to teams with payrolls below the luxury tax threshold).
They didn't really mention that games played minimum when the bonus clause was first reported this past summer. Nate'll be okay, but still...bummer for the little guy. With the caveat that I couldn't care less about the Celtics' success and would, in fact, like to see them lose in the most humiliating way possible, I'm disappointed that Nate isn't getting to spin much during the playoffs.
As a side note, if ever I'm an NBA player with such clauses in my contract, I will demand that all bonuses be delivered to me in an oversized canvas bag marked with a dollar sign.
8 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
NOW We know why D'Antoni wasn't playing him
It had nothing to do with his immature attitude or his selfish style of play. D’Antoni was saving Walsh and now I gues Ainge a buck or two.
by Robert Currence on May 6, 2010 11:56 AM EDT reply actions
Boy that's preposterous
The D’Antoni bashing is getting off the charts crazy right now. I hope I just missed the tongue firmly planted in your cheek.
If Boston benched him those games just so they didn't have to pay him
That’s kinda messed up. I mean, I doubt Nate will have to live under a bridge because of it, but I wonder if they did it on purpose, like the Browns did to Brady Quinn last year.
dont flag me seth. this is really how i feel about the celtics.
by karamjitm9090 on May 6, 2010 10:09 PM EDT up reply actions
wouldn't dream of it
that’s how i feel about the celtics.
check your listed email, by the way. you won that nba.com contest.
eh, the dark side of NBA Business rears its head
Bummer for Nate. Of course they sat him to save the money. Maybe it wasn’t their intention originally, but when the season was almost over and the games played clause is close to the limit, then I’m sure they decided to bench him. Unfortunately, Nate doesn’t have a vitale spot in the rotation so its hard to make the argument that they need him to win. It would be a bigger deal if Nate was like the 6th man or a starter.
"you're the Rod Thorn in my Chris Bosh side."
by Chris Child's Fist on May 7, 2010 2:04 PM EDT reply actions

by 















