Rudy Fernandez trade talks
via ProBasketballTalk via Jonathan Abrams:
The Knicks are reportedly discussing a trade for the salty Spaniard who wants to leave Portland for a bigger opportunity. The teams are discussing a package of either Wilson Chandler or Toney Douglas and a 2nd rounder.
Contract-wise, Fernandez comes cheap at 1.25 million with a team option the following year and the Knicks would instantly upgrade their three point shooting.
If it's between Chandler or Douglas, it's an easy choice. My guess is that the Blazers said Douglas and Walsh countered with Chandler.
Update:
Let me clarify, via the Fix, that source said Knicks are "interested" in Rudy Fernandez. Nothing imminent. Just talk for now.
Alan Hahn says not to get your panties in a bunch just yet. -Seth
Update again (Hahn again):
The Knicks have talked with several teams about their first-round picks. The reason for this is the potential of one of the main draft targets: New Mexico swingman Darington Hobson.
The Knicks, according to an NBA executive, have talked to the Memphis Grizzlies about buying one of their late first-round picks at No. 25 or No. 28. Another scenario, according to two other sources in the NBA, is an offer that could involve sending Wilson Chandler and cash to the Portland Trail Blazers for Rudy Fernandez and the No. 22 pick.
Re-bunch those panties. -Seth
99 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
*shrug*
It’s from the NYTimes and the team tried to get him before so probably.
by gian casimiro on Jun 23, 2010 2:13 PM EDT up reply actions
I realllly hope not
You and I seem to agree on the FanPost thread chattin’ about this… Will > Rudy.
Werd,
And I’m not sure why Chandler or Douglas is an easy choice. You keep Chandler if possible imo. He is a good young player who can score, rebound, and has consistently improved. He also can de up some pretty good scorers. I like Toney Douglas and all, but he is an undersized combo guard, albeit one with an impressive game and good defensive instincts, but I’ll take Will over Douglas if I had to choose. I feel like Chandler is more well rounded and I think he still has some real upside left, which I see no reason he won’t reach because he constantly is improving his game year by year.
Don’t get me wrong, I like TD a lot, but I really like Chandler, I think more then most here. I wouldn’t trade either of them for Rudy.
by al's brick foundation on Jun 24, 2010 3:07 AM EDT up reply actions
its about fit.
I like Chan, I hope they keep Chan (or at least trade him for a better player then Rudy F) but Rudy’s game does fit the Knicks (3pt shooting!!) better.
And I said it lower in the thread, but trading TD for Rudy, then you got Chan, Gallo, Walker..and then sign HWSNBN? You simply cannot do that
You gotta trade Chan if you get Rudy..not TD. TD is a PG.
KEEP LEE!!!
by FreeBradshaw on Jun 24, 2010 8:19 AM EDT up reply actions
exactly
We cannot put ourselves ina situation to have NO pg on the roster. especially one that showed fast improvement
Toney does what the douglas do. And no one can do what he does b/c doing it without being Toney Douglas just doesnt make it do what it do
u think i make this shyt up for fun?! *scarface voice
but yea….will > rudy
Toney does what the douglas do. And no one can do what he does b/c doing it without being Toney Douglas just doesnt make it do what it do
I feel like Chandler is a very nice piece for NY
We have a good use for versatile players who can play multiple positions.
Why are we so quick to throw Wilson Chandler’s name into the trade winds???
Has he not grown each season and helped us improve?!?!
"you're the Rod Thorn in my Chris Bosh side."
by Chris Child's Fist on Jun 23, 2010 2:20 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
I got no problem (well..I got a problem with it, but I can't see how Chan is untouchable)
with dealing Chan.
For the right deal. Rudy Fernandez is NOT the right friggin deal.
why not just keel him? They’ll be making the same money..so its not that.
KEEP LEE!!!
by FreeBradshaw on Jun 23, 2010 2:33 PM EDT up reply actions
i'm quick to throw him in
but this is too lateral to be worth it, for me.
twitter.com/aighttho
http://aightthen.tumblr.com/
I completely agree.
I love Chandlers all around game, and it seems like he improves something about it every year. His mid range game got really really good this year, in all facets. From the post, off the dribble, on the pull up in transition. He can get to the rack and he hits his FTs. Surrounded by a better team this guy could be a 3rd option IMO.
by al's brick foundation on Jun 24, 2010 3:10 AM EDT up reply actions
there's no way the Knicks can do anything about that.
I don’t think they can trade any more 1st rounders..at least any that the Hornets care about. They’d definitely have to include Cock in that deal..probably chan too.
maybe they can try and give up Chan, sign and trade Lee and Curry’s expiring + 2nd rounder and Toney Douglas…but not only do the Hornets probably not do that but that’s like the entire team right there.
KEEP LEE!!!
by FreeBradshaw on Jun 23, 2010 2:35 PM EDT up reply actions
Not sayin' Nawlins would go for it either...
But you’d give up all of those things for CP3? Sounds like a lot and I would have at least kept DWTDD off that list… I’d go for Will, Lee, Curry and maybe a 2nd. I mean, if Orlando supposedly offered Jameer and an aging Carter… our deal without DWTDD would still trump the Orlando deal.
Might even trump the Nets possible offer of Harris and the 3rd pick.
What if we agree to take okafor contract as well i mean if its to get cp3 and thats what it toke id do it
by J3TSFANFORLYF3 on Jun 23, 2010 2:45 PM EDT up reply actions
I wouldn't do that trade
but that’s all the Knicks really got, and that’s probably still below anything the Whorenets can get for CP3.
The Nets I think offered Devin Harris and their 1st rounder. That’s a lot less bodies/$ to sort through, and probably a better offer.
Or maybe Chan, Lee, Curry’s contract and 2nd rounder could get it done? I’m assuming TD in there tho cuz well..he’s pretty good, young and slightly proven. And could be a good scoring option off the bench.
I’d also assume the Knicks would be forced to take back a contract too.
KEEP LEE!!!
by FreeBradshaw on Jun 23, 2010 2:51 PM EDT up reply actions
i agree
harris and the 2nd isnt enough. especially when they have collison as their #1 pg(no cp3)
and carter/nelson isnt what they want. NO wants $. and curry has a nice chunk there coming off the books. along with talent in lee+chandler
Toney does what the douglas do. And no one can do what he does b/c doing it without being Toney Douglas just doesnt make it do what it do
Cock, TD, and and Curry's expiring for CP3?
I have to pull the trigger on that. You still have Chandler and you increase your chances to land Lebron by a shit load. I would miss Cock and Douglas but I have to make that deal if its there.
by al's brick foundation on Jun 24, 2010 3:21 AM EDT up reply actions
Wait. What?
Toney Douglas can’t do what Toney Douglas do all the way in Portland.
Can Rudy Fernandez DWTDD? My guess is no.
"He's the straw that makes the drink go."
by Thelonious Dunk on Jun 23, 2010 2:54 PM EDT reply actions
What?!
The only things worth trading Chandler for, is CP3 or to move up into the top ten in the draft.
interested in your responses
vote in my fanpost which i made before this thread opend :)
Toney does what the douglas do. And no one can do what he does b/c doing it without being Toney Douglas just doesnt make it do what it do
nah your good..this got more pub than my article did anyway
Toney does what the douglas do. And no one can do what he does b/c doing it without being Toney Douglas just doesnt make it do what it do
idk
I like Will and he’s been a good player throughout these last few dismal yrs & has kept us engaged with the occasional ferocious jam now and again. I think Chandler has tons of potential and will get better but I can’t tell if I’m kidding myself or not with wishful thinking.
Chandler could easily become a beast and cause consistent fits to defenses night in and out but I can also see him staying at his current level and remaining stagnant, if this is so is he really untouchable?
Don’t know much about Rudy but if the contracts match and he is as good as him I won’t be the worst move we made.
What did the 5 fingers say to the face?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7CBwX1891A
HaHaHaHa!
by Lord Smackington on Jun 23, 2010 3:15 PM EDT reply actions
No way
I trade Wil for Rudy….No one on this team is untradeable but I think they could get something better for Wil than Rudy
Only 2 things I can think off the top of the dome
is I’d trade Chan in a package for CP3. Or I’d trade Chan and try and get Rubio.
Basically…PG.
What Rudy can possibly bring to the Knicks that Chan, or Bully, doesn’t..I don’t have a clue. He certainly didn’t show it with the Blazers.
I’d even take Bill Walker in the dunk contest over Rudy. I think Rudy should go give Sergio a spanish tickler.
KEEP LEE!!!
he's a better long range shooter.
and they probably outweigh him by 35-50 pounds each
twitter.com/aighttho
http://aightthen.tumblr.com/
Agreed.
The only way I move Wil is for a PG. Same thing with Gallo, but Gallo only goes for CP3. I know some wouldnt do it, but I’d have to.
by al's brick foundation on Jun 24, 2010 3:25 AM EDT up reply actions
I can live with
a starting lineup of CP3, Cock, Peja, that guy on Cleveland, Curry coming alive in a contract year.
Giving up Chandler and wtvr picks they want and some $, taking back Peja’s contract (can we afford Posey too if we need to take him back?), having DWTDD and Walker off the bench along with wtvr picks we have left, then mystery fillers (Giddens? Barron? Randolph Morris? Borkman? Lampe?).
Or we can just trade Curry’s expiring contract for Baron and sign the Cleveland guy and Bosh.
dachssnewblog.blogspot.com
id have walker over peja
peja would be the bench shooter
Toney does what the douglas do. And no one can do what he does b/c doing it without being Toney Douglas just doesnt make it do what it do
I'd be fine with that
although cock and peja on the floor at the same time with Paul and the guy on the Cavs would be awesome. Plus Walker would probably be less disgruntled with a bench role than Peja would. I love Walker though.
I am a Real American...
Yo Wil's good and all
and he’s getting better. Problem is that, on the Knicks, he’s a shooting guard who can’t shoot. He also plays the most easily filled position in the league. It’s not like teams have even inquired about him, let alone been knocking down the doors for him (obviously I don’t know that, but in rumors Knicks are always offering him, not being offered for him). Look at the rosters of most teams in the league and you’ll see that most have good options at SF. Wil’s trade value is only so good.
I like Rudy and he’s a legit SG. I think he’s getting unduly burried because of both BRoy and because he’s not McMillan’s type. He is D’Antoni’s type though. Him and Bully lock up the SG spot. Boom.
"But when he saw it, he just put his hands up and they couldn’t give it to him. It just fell to the ground, I-I don’t, you know … So, that showed me he had great experience..." - Jeff Van Gundy
by Anthony Bonner's Subpoena on Jun 23, 2010 4:34 PM EDT reply actions
Gotta agree...
Wilson Chandler is redundant on the roster with Galinari on board as the future small forward…
Rudy is a monster at the shooting guard and would be awsome in D’antoni system.
Not sayin' Rudy wouldn't work or not to trade Will...
Just sayin’ I think value-wise on the open market, we could do better than Will for Rudy straight up. Ignoring how I team looks… if you had to pick the “better player”, I think most people would say Will over Rudy.
I think something like * Will + 2nd Rounder FOR Rudy + 22nd Pick *. I would be on board for that… NOT a simple one-fer-one deal.
yea i might be with you
i feel like wilson can guard bigger players and rudy can’t. but i haven’t watched the guy play too much. so it’s tough. maybe fernandez makes rubio push the twolves to trade him to ny??
basketball is making me lose my mind right now.
twitter.com/aighttho
http://aightthen.tumblr.com/
rudy is a great fit here
but he’s not the all-around player that chandler is. Start walker at the 2 and have chandler (who can play 3 positions) come off the bench if you want. Plus, i think MD has PF aspirations for gallo in the long run. Really though, i dont see this happening until after the draft and early days of free agency. If one of the FA additions is a SG like johnson or gay, then this is moot.
Nawlins is one team that doesn’t have a sf that’s any good. We could get more from them for chandler than a player of rudy’s caliber. Questionable attitude and commitment to the NBA too.
"Game Knows Game"
by Ray Smuckles on Jun 23, 2010 5:00 PM EDT up reply actions
heh... beat me by a minute on basically the same post
And I’ll stop repeating myself now since I know I’ve said the same thing a few times scattered around these comments. lol
Chandler (Better Defense) Rudy (Better Shooter), otherwise they are equal.
Rudy is a very good dunker and a better finisher above the rim the Chandler. Chandler seems like he lost a few inches on his vertical after that first knee injury, now instead of dunking on everyone he always finishes with a layup, a nice layup mind you but it’s still a below the rim shot that is easier to block then a dunk.
Chandler is a better defender but he’s a pure slasher as a scorer with no confidence in his mid-range shot and ZERO 3-point range. He’s a great high character guy but he’s suffered through injuries each of the last 3 seasons right? He’s not really a multi position player because he has no post moves to play PF and can’t shoot which is what SG’s do best.
Rudy is a great 3-point shooter, with clutch shots last season when given minutes in late game situations, he’s a high flyer that will entertain with flashy dunks, same as Chandler did before his injuries, he’s not a troublemaker and is still young.
I know everyone here likes Chandler because he’s one of ours but he’s not untouchable, he’s a second round pick that hasn’t lit the world on fire, he’s good but not good enough to keep at all cost. Some reporters over at Sports Illustrated have said that they believe NYC’s pitch to LBJ is building a team that can spread the floor for him, while he attacks the rim all-day-long. If that’s true then lets take a look at why a trade of Chandler for Rudy makes sense.
Knicks 2010
PG Tony D – 3-point specialist/defender
SG Rudy – 3-point specialist+athletic finisher
SF LBJ – More PG then SF but can defend his position with ease.
PF Gallo – 3-point specialist that can attack the rim and get to the line, doesn’t clog up the lane for LBJ.
C – Insert defensive minded draft pick here … Vernado? Whiteside? Insert free agent instead … Amare? Bosh?
Now that looks like the kind of team that can exploit LBJ’s ability to pass/attack the rim and draw 5 defenders … which is crazy but it happens! Also remember who our coach is Mr. 7-seconds-or-less, run & gun, max # of positions Phoenix Suns Pringles. This LOOKS like a team Mike D’less would build!
I don’t agree with giving up a draft pick, Chandler is a risk for Portland given his injury history, Rudy is a risk for us given his lack of production (due to lack of minutes I believe, but WTE), so I say a clean swap of the two young players or we do this deal to move up in the draft, 2 second round picks+Chandler for a late 1st+Rudy?
It’s LeBRON, not LeBrAHHHn, Chris Broussard you Rick Brunson rippoff!!
Listen man, I value your opinion a lot. And I think you make a few good points.
But there’s a few things that genuinely bother me about this.
1. “Rudy Gay is a better finisher.”
This year, Chandler shot 48%. He’s 45% for his career.
This year, Rudy shot 38%. He’s 40% for his career.
Now, this stat wouldn’t be so bad, since you were only talking about finishing around the rim. However, because you also make the point that Rudy’s a better shooter, you dead your argument right there.
2. Wilson Chandler doesn’t dunk as much anymore. Rudy still does."
Chandler – 45 dunks this year.
Rudy – 4 dunks this year.
Now, Rudy only played 1441 minutes, while Chandler played 2320. So let’s do some division
Rudy: 4 dunks in 1441 minutes is a dunk every 360 minutes.
Chandler: 45 dunks in 2320 is a dunk every 51 minutes.
Okay.
3. “Rudy Fernandez is a much better shooter.”
Well, Rudy shot 15 of 51 from midrange this year, or 29%.
Chandler shot 78 of 207, or 37%.
So let’s continue this conversation, only now we have a few more facts.
All good points
However, Rudy is not well coached in Portland, they play him sparingly and play him solely as a 3-point specialist, which never works since jump shooters need consistent minutes in order to build a rhythm.
When Rudy does get that rare chance to finish at the rim he finishes above the rim, Chandler mostly scored in the paint and he almost always uses a layup. Again his layup skill is among the best in the league but he should not be rated a better athlete then Rudy since Chandler isn’t the fastest sprinter in the world nor can he jump out of the gym like he used to.
This season was a bad year for Rudy, which is why I labeled him a risk for NYC, just like Chandler is a risk for Portland because of his injury history.
09-10 season totals
Rudy – 62 Games, 2 Starts, 1,440 MIN, 160-423 FGM-A, 98-266 3PM-A, 85-98 FTM-A, 164 REB, 127 AST, 62 STL, 11 BLK, 72 TO, 503 PTS.
That’s averages of 23.2 MPG, 37FG%, 36-3P%, 86FT%, 2.6 RPG, 2 APG, 1 SPG, 0.2 BPG, 8.1 PPG.
Chandler – 85 Games, 64 Starts, 2,319 MIN, 412-860 FGM-A, 40-150 3PM-A, 129-160 FTM-A, 348 REB, 138 AST, 46 STL, 49 BLK, 108 TO, 993 PTS.
That’s averages of 35.7 MPG, 47FG%, 26-3P%, 80FT%, 5.4 RPG, 2.1 APG, 0.7 SPG, 0.8 BPG, 15.3 PPG.
In far less minutes and far less starts, Rudy had a better 3P% and total, had almost as many assists, just as good a APG average, more steals and a better SPG average. That in an off year for Rudy, in a system that doesn’t use him properly nor cares to, since the coach loves Batum’s defense, has Brandon Roy playing the SG and likes to play Miller+Roy together in the backcourt. How can the guy get his rhythm going when he’s behind Roy on the depth chart, + the veteran Miller and the coach values the D of Batum?
Chandler has better numbers because he’s on a horrible team that starts him, and even then his numbers aren’t astronomically better then Rudy’s. Now lets compare Rudy’s first season with Chandlers’ best.
08-09 Season
Rudy – 78 Games, 4 Starts, 1,992 MIN, 268-630 FGM-A, 159-398 3PM-A, 120-143 FTM-A, 207 REB, 159 AST, 69 STL, 12 BLK, 86 TO, 815 PTS.
Those are averages of 25.6 MPG, 42FG%, 39-3P%, 83 FT%, 2.7 RPG, 2 APG, 0.9 SPG, 0.2 BPG, 1.10 TO, 10.4 PPG.
Chandler – 82 Games, 70 Starts, 2,319 MIN, 455-1,054 FGM-A, 103-314 3PM-A, 171-215 FTM-A, 445 REB, 170 AST, 71 STL, 75 BLK, 139 TO, 1,184 PTS.
Those are averages of 33.4 MPG, 43FG%, 32-3P%, 79 FT%, 5.4 RPG, 2.1 APG, 0.9 SPG, 0.9 BPG, 1.70 TO, 14.4 PPG.
Again Chandler had more minutes and FAR more starts and still hit less 3-pointers with a a worse average, and barely did better then Rudy in total Free throws, Assists, Steals and Points, while barely averaging better then Rudy in FG%, APG & PPG, while hitting less of his free throws.
For their careers Rudy has 1,318 PTS, 286 AST, 131 STL, 257 3PM, on 3,433 MIN, 140 Games & only 6 Starts.
Chandler for his career has 2,432 PTS, 341 AST, 132 STL, 152 3PM, on 5,739 MIN, 182 Games & 150 Starts.
Chandler has played more minutes, more games, started more games and has one more season under his belt then Rudy and still he numbers, both averages and totals, aren’t that much better then Rudy’s.
Rudy’s numbers show that he is a far better shooter, especially from 3, is a better passer and steals the ball at a higher rate. Chandler is a much better rebounder, shot blocker and does a better job of scoring in the paint but his numbers are inflated compared to Rudy’s because Chandler gets consistent minutes, while Rudy does not. Chandler plays on a horrible team with no one in his way on the depth chart, Rudy has Brandon Roy playing his position.
I like Chandler but I feel that Rudy would have far better numbers in NYC, with Chandler’s minutes, and Pringles offensive schemes then Chandler has in his time here, plus Chandler is starting to show a propensity for getting injured, which is troubling. If I had a shot of landing Rudy straight up for Chandler, or trading Chandler + 2n round picks for Rudy and a late 1st round pick I’d do it STAT!
It’s LeBRON, not LeBrAHHHn, Chris Broussard you Rick Brunson rippoff!!
Well,
When we’re talking about a 25 year old and a 23 year old, you can’t really play the “He had a bad year” card.
There’s progress, and then there’s not.
Last year Rudy Fernandez shot 37% from the floor. That’s a deal-breaker.
You have an issue with his age?
His age was inconsequential, it was only his second year in the league. Yes I can play the sophomore slump card.
It’s LeBRON, not LeBrAHHHn, Chris Broussard you Rick Brunson rippoff!!
are you guys taling about the same player??
We gotta stop with this Rudy shit. There is Rudy Gay and Rudy Fernandez.
"you're the Rod Thorn in my Chris Bosh side."
by Chris Child's Fist on Jun 23, 2010 9:12 PM EDT up reply actions
How about both?
If LBJ has a brain fart and goes somewhere other then NYC, why not sign Rudy Gay to play SF, trade for Rudy Fernandez for SG, play Tony D at PG, Gallo at PF and insert whichever draft pick &/or free agent to play Center?
Not the best case scenario but not a bad plan B either.
Would be fun just to see Walt freak at trying to keep track of which Rudy he be talkin about during the course of a game!
It’s LeBRON, not LeBrAHHHn, Chris Broussard you Rick Brunson rippoff!!
Chandler > Rudy
Rudy would be a nice pickup but Chandler is one of the few guys on the team that can defend. I don’t wanna replace that with another guy who doesn’t defend but can score. The Blazers have a few guys kinda similar to Chandler too. He wouldn’t add much. Not worth giving up Douglas for him either. I’d definitely be down if they took say… Walker and Duhon (if we resigned him).
Speaking of which, anyone else agree it’d be worth resigning guys like Duhon, Giddens and House for the vet’s min. and then using them as trade pieces?
I dunno that the Knicks could get anything for Dudu, Giddens or House
I’d keep Giddens tho..just to fill out the roster. Maybe House, dude can still be a lights out shooter at times..annoying most of the time tho.
KEEP LEE!!!
by FreeBradshaw on Jun 23, 2010 8:47 PM EDT up reply actions
id keep giddens
but not house. id rather not have him jack up shot after shot when barron and or walker will take smarter shots
Toney does what the douglas do. And no one can do what he does b/c doing it without being Toney Douglas just doesnt make it do what it do
No NYC should not resign Duhon.
That man had zero trade value last offseason, after an ok season no less. No way he has any trade value now.
It’s LeBRON, not LeBrAHHHn, Chris Broussard you Rick Brunson rippoff!!
Chandler
for rudy fernandez AND the 22nd pick is actually a pretty good deal. Especially if hobson is as good as they believe.
"Game Knows Game"
i may
or may not agree with you. i think i’m resolved to believe the knicks are completely fucked tho.
twitter.com/aighttho
http://aightthen.tumblr.com/
+1
best case scenario: we don’t trade anyone and dolan shells out $15 million on draft night for 4-6 new players.
Big splash in more ways than one…pause.
"Game Knows Game"
by Ray Smuckles on Jun 24, 2010 12:07 AM EDT up reply actions
i would be pretty excited by that
but it won’t happen.
twitter.com/aighttho
http://aightthen.tumblr.com/
Chandler is a good player he’s just not a Shooting Guard not for the obvious reason that he can’t shoot. He doesn’t have the handle to create his own shot. If the Knicks can get Fernandez for Toney Douglas and a 2nd rounder it’d be a done deal. Rodriguez by default is the only shooting Guard on the roster and I’m sure he’d be comfortable in D’Antoni’s offense. I don’t think he could guard himself though and Chandler is their best defender. So given the choice to trade T.D. or Chandler I’m fucking keeping Chandler. He’s an above average backup at both positions and in an emergency can even play from PF.
by TheBXRepresenta on Jun 23, 2010 11:37 PM EDT reply actions
woah...
how can you trade DWTDD over an above average backup? Let’s leave the DWTDD’s out of this
http://www.lostinbostonblog.tumblr.com
@lostinbostonRB
by viva_morrison on Jun 23, 2010 11:41 PM EDT up reply actions
All Toney Douglas actually is himself is an above average backup.
by al's brick foundation on Jun 24, 2010 3:34 AM EDT up reply actions
you could not have watched the latter part of the season and believe that....
KEEP LEE!!!
by FreeBradshaw on Jun 24, 2010 8:05 AM EDT up reply actions
I do.
You think TD is an NBA starting PG on a winning team? I’m sorry, I just don’t see it. Not without a sick supporting cast.
by al's brick foundation on Jun 24, 2010 12:58 PM EDT up reply actions
no PG is any good with out a supporting cast
TD can hit any shot on the floor, can slash to the lane too.
And also…did you notice that TD was a rook last year? Lets not play out that the guy can’t get better.
The only thing in his can is that he’s not a great facilitator. Everything else…dude is absolutely starting caliber.
Not saying he’ll be Rondo, but Rondo wasn’t exactly shit until he had the big 3.
KEEP LEE!!!
by FreeBradshaw on Jun 24, 2010 1:14 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Think Jameer not Nash/Paul/Williams
Jameer Nelson is a good quality starting PG, Fisher wasn’t too bad for LA either, and neither one is considered the best TRUE PG in the league.
TD can be all that for this squad, sure everyone would like a young Jason Kidd but what’s not to love about a high scoring PG, that can defend his position, on an offensively minded team like ours?
We could be hitting mad 3’s every night and challenging for an appearance in the finals like the Magic, especially if we have a go-to-guy like LBJ, which is what Orlando is missing.
It’s LeBRON, not LeBrAHHHn, Chris Broussard you Rick Brunson rippoff!!
Yes
To be clear I would not trade either Wil or TD for Fernandez….and even tho TD will most likely be our starting PG…I don’t think he’s anything but an above average backup in the NBA…..he’d be a great bench guy to give quality minutes to a much better PG
woah indeed
pretty sure TD is the starting pg, while chandler could be 6 different things. Love the chandy man, but if anyone’s getting traded it’s gonna be him. or maybe that grizzly with cornrows wearing a suit on the bench.
"Game Knows Game"
by Ray Smuckles on Jun 24, 2010 12:12 AM EDT up reply actions
I like TD
but if he is our starting PG, and Lebron James isn’t a Knick, we’re going nowhere fast.
by al's brick foundation on Jun 24, 2010 3:35 AM EDT up reply actions
with Rudy Fernandez a Knick, and no Lebron...
they really ain’t going anywhere. Like they’d not go anywhere fast, but be moving in reverse.
How the hell is it justifiable to keep Chan and trade for Rudy? That makes no sense at all.
Leaves a gaping hole at PG..a place where the Knicks aren’t exactly stocked to begin with I
In fact….getting another SF/SG in place of a PG is quite possibly the worst move they could possibly make.
KEEP LEE!!!
by FreeBradshaw on Jun 24, 2010 8:03 AM EDT up reply actions
What are you talking about?
Why are you talking about Rudy? I said like 3 times in this thread I don’t want the guy, I wouldn’t trade toney Douglas or Chandler for him. All I ever said is I like Chandler better then Toney. I don’t see Toney Douglas as a starting point guard. I see him as a bench combo guard who is a bit undersized and can get some instant offense. Basically, Nate Robinson with better defense, but still just a spark plug off the bench.
If you don’t agree that’s fine, but I don’t know what Rudy has to do with anything. I never said anything about trading TD for Rudy.
by al's brick foundation on Jun 24, 2010 12:58 PM EDT up reply actions
Sergio is gone man...
and he’s also a PG..one who loves to turn the ball over and can’t really shoot either.
So you’re “fucking keeping Chandler”, trading for ANOTHER SF, and leaving the PG with no one.
Good idea. Especially since most likely you’re implying they should re-sign Dudu.
KEEP LEE!!!
by FreeBradshaw on Jun 24, 2010 8:05 AM EDT up reply actions
No PG on the roster ... how does that make sense?
Like I said before, and someone else has mentioned as well, it’s about who fits the system and about how LeBron fits in.
Surrounding LBJ with sharp shooters (Douglas, Rudy, Gallo) and defensive minded C/PF (Whiteside, Verdnado) or a quality sidekick that can score at the PF spot (Lee, Bosh, Boozer, etc) makes all the sense in the world for Pringles system. He is STILL our coach after all.
Why do so many people value Chandler over Douglas? The man is our ONLY PG, how does that not register? We cannot trade for one, unless New Orleans is crazy enough to ship out CP3, and we cannot draft one since there is no one of real value at that position in this draft not named Wall/Turner.
Gallo plays SF better then Chandler, Rudy is a real SG since he can hit from 3, hell even Walker is a better option at SG because he can hit 3’s also. and yes it DOES matter who can hit the 3 ball at SG since that spaces the floor, allowing for bigger lanes to the rim for LBJ to drive through. I’m sorry, I like Chandler but that makes him expendable. We have NO ONE that can fill in at PG for Douglas, so that makes him untouchable unless we get a PG in any deal for Douglas.
Besides that I think people aren’t giving Douglas a fair shake, I see him as a Jameer Nelson type. High scoring, 3 point specialist, all-star caliber PG. I don’t think he’ll ever lead the league in assists (neither will Nelson) but he can be a great offensive PG for this team & he plays D, so what more do you want?
It’s LeBRON, not LeBrAHHHn, Chris Broussard you Rick Brunson rippoff!!
Only PG?
What?? You mean T-Mac ain’t comin’ back to run the show???
Lol.
Why do so many people value Chandler over Douglas? The man is our ONLY PG, how does that not register? We cannot trade for one, unless New Orleans is crazy enough to ship out CP3, and we cannot draft one since there is no one of real value at that position in this draft not named Wall/Turner.
Earl Barron is our only center. I guess that means he is more valuable then cock is. Who gives a shit if TD is our only “point guard”? Go get another one. We also have no shooting guard, and no center. We only have like 3 players on the roster. I like Chandler more then Douglas.
Some of you guys here just drink the kool-aid for players like Gallo and TD, which is awesome, until it gets to a point where you act like they are so untouchable and amazing that nobody in the league is better then they are, and anybody who disagrees with anything you guys think about these players must just be a troll and be some kind of moron.
I have been flamed here on numerous occasions just for criticizing Gallo, who hasn’t done anything during his career besides jack up 1000 3 pointers. Does he have a lot of room to grow and some serious potential? Sure, but right now he is just a 22 year old who has had serious back issues that hasn’t really been able to do anything in the NBA besides chuck up long balls to this point. While I like gallo and think he has a bright future, please excuse me if I don’t get a boner over what the guy has done to this point in his career, even though at times here you would think he was better then Dirk.
Toney Douglas will be a nice bench player on a good team, but thinking he is a starter based on a 1/3 of a completely lost season where TD had no pressure on him? I don’t know, I hope you guys are right, I just don’t see it. Not yet at least.
by al's brick foundation on Jun 24, 2010 1:06 PM EDT up reply actions
Nice how you made this about Gallo
Weren’t we talking about TD?
Yea we need a Center but the Knicks can make moves to draft Whiteside or Varnado, who out their is a lock for PG???
It’s not as easy to just trade for a PG, not a good one anyway. Yea we could sign Jordan Farmar off of free agency but what has he done? Raymond Felton is expected to ask for too much cash, remember the Knicks wonna save their cap space for LBJ + his BFF.
I’d love to trade for a young PG, like Ricky Rubio, but Shaka Kahn is a tool, so trading with the Wolves for Rubio won’t happen until Kahn is fired.
People have said it before, the Knicks plan is to sign LBJ, so they’ll probably be building their team around that concept, which means shooters who can space the floor. Chandler can’t shoot so he won’t take Gallo’s spot away from him, plus that makes Chandler expendable at SG.
Douglas however can shoot the lights out, like a Jameer Nelson, and the Knicks don’t have any better options at PG so there’s no moving him right now. I’m not saying TD is untouchable I’m saying their are NO better options this offseason, so there.
It’s LeBRON, not LeBrAHHHn, Chris Broussard you Rick Brunson rippoff!!
i dont know
feeling assured that TD is nothing more than a bench player on a good team based on 1/3 of a lost season seems to follow the same short-sightedness. And the reason most guys around here get excited when he or gallo do something great is because it projects that they are slowly gaining on their high ceilings. Making improvement, you know? Going for a guy like fernandez who has done less than TD with more time seems counter-productive to the improvements being made.
Not trying to flame you either, cause you’re right in a way: a lot of the time people are writing with their orange and blue glasses on. Nobody is or should be untouchable with all the holes on this roster
"Game Knows Game"
by Ray Smuckles on Jun 24, 2010 4:09 PM EDT up reply actions
the problem is..
and I ain’t saying who’s trading who or anything..is position value.
If the choice is..trade for Rudy Fernandez, and you give up either Toney Dougals..a PG/SG, or WIlson Chandler..a 6"8 SF/SG/PF….you give up Chandler.
None of these guys, ideally, are starting…so there.
And with Rudy Fernandez…you still have Gallo and Chanlder on the team. And Bill Walker most likely. And JR Giddens.
Does anyone not see this?
Sure, no one’s untouchable , by trading Douglas for Fernandez…you create a hole on the team..absolutely unnecessarily.
Who gives a shit if TD is “a backup”. Right now, he’s the only PG on the roster. So now they’d need to sign 2 PG’s.
Toney Douglas for Fernandez makes no sense.
KEEP LEE!!!
by FreeBradshaw on Jun 24, 2010 4:21 PM EDT up reply actions
Right you are ...
Though knowing Pringles he’ll try trading TD for Rudy, resign Duhon, then sign Raja Bell as the starter!!!
Curse you Mike, I can never eat a can of Pringles again!!!
It’s LeBRON, not LeBrAHHHn, Chris Broussard you Rick Brunson rippoff!!
Fair enough.
I’m not assured that TD is a backup, it just seems like what he is. He’s not a true 1 or 2, and he’s a bit small. I like him coming off the bench how Nate did. I like TD, I like Gallo, and I like Chandler. I wouldn’t trade any of them for Rudy. I just think that for whatever reason, Gallo and TD are overrated by our fans while Will is underrated. Probably because cock and Toney came from more recent drafts. I remember when everybody loved Will. Now all he has done is progress each year, and people have mostly soured on him.
by al's brick foundation on Jun 24, 2010 5:09 PM EDT up reply actions
reassuring
thank you. cant believe im still getting sucked in by every little rumor. ive become the monster i set out to destroy.
"Game Knows Game"
by Ray Smuckles on Jun 24, 2010 12:58 PM EDT up reply actions
Ha, a monster named Smuckles!
Sounds like a Disney character. :p
It’s LeBRON, not LeBrAHHHn, Chris Broussard you Rick Brunson rippoff!!
he smells like strawberries
"He's the straw that makes the drink go."
by Thelonious Dunk on Jun 24, 2010 2:26 PM EDT up reply actions
ARE YOU F*CKING KIDDING ME
Trade away Chandler for Fernandez…Chander averaged double the points Fernandez did and double the rebounds and Douglaus was one of our draft picks last year and did just as good as Fernandez did as a rookie why would you go after this piece of sh*t player are you trying to lose all your fans and completely destroy this team
has anyone heard about the GS trading the eigth pick in the draft and packaging it with Monta Ellis’ 5 yr 55 mil contract? not sure how we could swing it but if we got curry in the deal his and Ellis cap hits would cancel and we be getting a shitload more production without adding any money. chandler, curry, both our seconds and something else? i dont know, very interesting deal though

by 















