They can't have Gallo or Randolph right?
http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news?slug=aw-anthonynuggets082610
Get ready to watch Melo get traded to a team that's not the Knicks real soon is the vibe I'm getting lately, and this new article is more of the same. Melo wants out now, which sucks real bad for us. We might not be able to get him even with Randolph and Gallo. This could be super disastrous for us if he goes to the Nets.
UGH
238 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
idc
if he goes to the nets den he still wont get a ring…if he really wants his ring and a chance to become the biggest den the knicks is where he wants to go…come on the clippers? are you serious? the rockets? yao ming is on one foot! the nets? lopez looked like shit for team USA against…foreign competition! lmfao at the bobcats. the only three teams that gives anthony any chance in the next 5 yrs is the thunder, lakers, celtics and knicks. every other team is either on the decline or teams dont looked primed to do much kuz the pieces really dont mesh well
In Donnie We Trust!
lopez
will have to be included in the deal.
I am a fan of both the mets and knicks... so just kill me now.
I mean, we can't give up Gallo and all this untapped potential,
but the Nets have to give up the number 3 overall pick along with a guy who has actually made a real impact on the league in Lopez, as opposed to Gallo who hasn’t even done anything yet but who we are refusing to move?
by al's brick foundation on Aug 27, 2010 1:18 PM EDT up reply actions
denver didnt really want gallo
and the reason most here didnt want to give up gallo was not that anyone argued gallo was better… it was because many hear feel the difference in tallent was not equal to the difference in cost.
I just assume that Denver would insist on Lopez. I could be wrong.
I think Gallo is about equal to Lopez in terms of potential. I would prefer Gallo though, as I think he is a better fit for the team.
I am a fan of both the mets and knicks... so just kill me now.
Gallo has the same potental as Brook Lopez?
As far as I can see, Gallo is a 20-5 guy, who lives and dies by the three point shoot. When hes off, hes off, Lopez is by far the better player now and will continue to be. The guy almost had a 20-10 season in his second year on the worst team in basketball.
Great teams build from the inside-out. Unless your team has a player such as Lebron, Anthony, Kobe, or Wade who can score at will, the small forward position normally is a role player who can play good defense.
Look at the Lakers who won with Ron Artest, a mainly defensive player as there small forward. The great Lakers of the early 2000’s one it with Rick Fox and the great bulls had Scottie Pippen who was again, a role player
"I Can't Wait Until Tomorrow...'Cause I Get Better Looking Every Day" Joe Namath
u know
I kinda agree Lopez is better now but I think Gallo has the higher ceiling. Lopez will get better but I don’t see him being better by that much he already is a very good player now.
Gallo excels at shooting but he has also shown some shot blocking and passing ability plus some slashing to the basket.
Neither by themselves equal a Carmelo but I don’t think either team should have to give those guys away if they don’t rush things and play it right.
People act as if Carmello will sign and be off the table tomorrow if we don’t offer our best players right now but even if we did that Carmello still gets paid this yr no matter what, he could get an acceptable trade offer and still decide to let other teams wait while he finished out his season in Denver if he chooses to do so.
What did the 5 fingers say to the face?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7CBwX1891A
HaHaHaHa!
by Lord Smackington on Aug 28, 2010 3:05 PM EDT up reply actions
I dont agree that gallo lives and dies by the 3 point shot
I dont get how after watching him play last season you can make that claim.
I am a fan of both the mets and knicks... so just kill me now.
sum ppl are jus retarded
jus let dem think wat they want…thats how u can tell who pays attention and who jus hops on cocks…no pun intended
In Donnie We Trust!
Callin Scottie Pippen a role player is kind of a stretch...
The dude had career averages with the Bulls of like 20ppg, 6rpg, 5apg, 1.5 spg and nearly 1bpg. I mean he wasn’t a face-of-the-franchise player but he was more than a role player is all I’m saying.
I think it’s quintessential to have a good SF to be a contender. Usually the 3 spot should be filled by a versatile player with good D, so hopefully Gallo will develop into that all-around talent we all think he can be
n u can jus
eat a fat pig peni*
In Donnie We Trust!
by IB on Aug 27, 2010 4:24 PM EDT up reply actions
Hahaha
“the only three teams that gives anthony any chance in the next 5 yrs is the thunder, lakers, celtics and knicks”
You know the Seventh Seed in the Playoffs doesn’t count as a championship right?
Even with Anthony. (Which is not going to happen), the Knicks are still the Second team in the East. There is no way that they would beat the Miami big three
Im not trying to rain on your parade, but a third team would be needed if the Knicks were to get Anthony, and why would that team trade players to the Knicks who they send to Denver, when that team (say Houston) could trade for Melo and leave the Knicks out in the cold (where they have been for a long time)
"I Can't Wait Until Tomorrow...'Cause I Get Better Looking Every Day" Joe Namath
i wrote it 3 teams before i thought about the thunder smh
i wish i was a robot wit spell check and grammar correction sheesh i swear sum of yall r anal
In Donnie We Trust!
it is what it is
I want Melo but im not giving up Cock or AR
if its meant to be its meant to be
if not im still thrilled about the team we have right now
Felton Cock AR Amare Turiaf Fields Buke TD guys like that have me really feeling good about the future
i'd give dem felton, AR, and wilson together with our 2014 pick and that switchable pick next year
have td run the point fuck it
In Donnie We Trust!
by IB on Aug 26, 2010 8:18 PM EDT up reply actions
actually ar came in a trade so he is tradeable...
and ar is potential dat was on the bench since his rookie season, at least gallo started and showed me sumthin all season. gallo should be the only untradeable person besides amare
In Donnie We Trust!
by IB on Aug 26, 2010 8:27 PM EDT up reply actions
he is, all the GSW guys are because we were under the cap when we traded for them
we should definitely not trade AR though
smh he was traded to our team
dec. 15th is the first day players who were signed can be traded
In Donnie We Trust!
by IB on Aug 26, 2010 8:34 PM EDT up reply actions
Its different for signed guys and for traded guys.
Signed players have to wait like 6 months before they can be traded. Traded guys have to wait 2 months.
"you're the Rod Thorn in my Chris Bosh side."
by Chris Child's Fist on Aug 27, 2010 10:53 AM EDT up reply actions
im telling u
everytime we trade a player they become good somewhere else
not everytime but u know what I mean
im telling u if we trade AR or Cock they will be great for that team and I dont want to see that anymore
im jus sayin
i’d rather keep the sharp shooter, a rare talent like AR is hard to find but not replaceable. plus ive seen gallo play ar hardly got off the bench im sorry but i dont fall in love wit players i dont see play
In Donnie We Trust!
by IB on Aug 26, 2010 8:38 PM EDT up reply actions
barf
Denver was furnished with a short list of teams and told to get to work. Yes, this how William Wesley and Leon Rose of CAA work now, thick with threats and ultimatums and a swagger suggesting that the sport belongs to them. After Anthony told owner-in-waiting Josh Kroenke that he still wanted out of Denver during a Sunday meeting, the Nuggets appear done trying to sell their All-Star forward on a contract extension.
Do Rose and Wes have any idea what a turn off this kind of shit is? Don’t get me wrong, I would love Carmelo on the Knicks blah blah blah but why is it these same parasites have to wrap their tentacles around every talented player people most love watching? It’s one thing to go somewhere as a free agent, that’s the whole point. But this new attitude of “well my contract is going to expire… eventually, so… fuck you if you won’t trade me now to wherever I want,” is lame. And it starts with these “advisers.”
its fucked up but
its reality. it actually is helpful because at least the nuggets will get sumthin in return. shit if i was anthony i’d use my contract as leverage to go straight to the knicks because he has the power to sign on the dotted line no one else. to be honest we’re prolly the only team besides okc that can compete for the next 6 or 7 years with the roster we have now. if the nuggets were smart they would take ar, td and wilson and a 1st rounder and 2 2nd rounders and say thanks melo
In Donnie We Trust!
by IB on Aug 26, 2010 8:41 PM EDT up reply actions
yeah it's still a bummer though
I just wish he would pump the breaks a little. One more year, shit even a few more months of playing for the Nuggets couldn’t be that bad. And i will be so, so angry if we trade Randolph before he ever suits up for us. We won the lottery with that kid, his advanced stats at 20 years old are right up there with Garnett, McGrady, Odom, (Sonics) Shawn Kemp when they were 20… it’s crazy. When he started games for Golden State, he averaged 15/11/2 blocks. At 20 years old. We have got to give him a shot, he costs practically nothing. I don’t want to trade Gallo, either (though I would if you put a gun to my head, I guess). Why can’t Carmelo just play out his damn contract?!
by flossy on Aug 26, 2010 8:56 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Shit
Honestly I have been a strong proponent of the keep Gallo camp. I have now moved my position. I’m not in the “ddoood stfu melo is da bom and if we dont get him well always suc on giant anteater nuts forever and gallo is a pussy and actually molested a little boy” camp, but I am at least willing to entertain dealing Gallo. Realistically our shot of getting Melo in FA next year is all but gone, if we want him we need to make a deal. I’m ready to entertain this. Having said that, I would rather give up a package of AR and Wil instead of Gallo (I love the cocK… wait) but ultimately I am willing to give up Danilo if it means getting Melo. DAMMIT MELO, WHY COULDN’T YOU JUST COME HERE IN FREE AGENCY!!!!
hmm
the nuggets have no leverage and honestly behind amare gallo is the second best, i doubt melo didnt notice that. and i agree i’d entertain it but im sorry melo holds to much leverage, if donnie is the man i think he is he wont trade the young man. AR on the other hand shit i dont care about no advanced stats, he’s fragile as fuck and im not into waiting years if we can get melo now and make that run plus in any deal the nuggets are goin to have to take eddy curry anyway
In Donnie We Trust!
by IB on Aug 26, 2010 9:39 PM EDT up reply actions
The nuggets wouldnt take eddie
There would have to be a team like Sacremento to take Eddie curry and a 1st from the knicks.
y would we have to trade a 1st to sacremento
In Donnie We Trust!
by IB on Aug 29, 2010 5:55 PM EDT up reply actions
Just offer them
Chandler Azubuike Curry, our 2014 first rounder and the rights to Jerome Jordan and let them sit on it.
The Nets might have the best asset to offer in a trade in Lopez… but then they’d be a team without Lopez, who was really their sole bright spot last year. Devin Harris is not that good. Houston has some good assets but I don’t think he really wants to go to Houston. The Clippers? Maybe…… but who are they giving up… Eric Gordon? Who else?
I think the Knicks are in the driver’s seat here – and if they aren’t, they shouldn’t bother.
For NJ to sign him
They’d lose some of their nice pieces, and just end up like a low seed playoff team. They’d probably have to give up Lopez, Terrence Williams and maybe Morrow. That’s a nice package but they would lose alot of good surrounding talent for Melo
It makes absolutely no difference who's got what...
Melo is in total control of where he goes. Once he decides which team it is, Denver will basically have to take whatever they offer or get stuck with nothing. I don’t know if that bodes well for the Knicks or not, but to think that the team with the most attractive offer for Denver is going to get Melo is being a bit short-sighted.
Holy hell...
I actually agree with Crackback…
Well he’s right. I’ve been telling everyone there is no “Waiting” to the offseason and signing Melo. He wants his money and he wants out of Denver so you have to sign and trade. It that simple. Wherever Melo wants to go that’s who Denver has to trade with, if they don’t they get nothing.
There is no need to be getting scared and start writing off our Melo fantasies. If you had faith Melo wants to be here before, this shouldn’t change your opinion one bit. If he wants to be here, he’ll demand a trade here, if they don’t want to trade him here, EVEN BETTER! We get him during the offseason. Hopefully Denver is stubborn and don’t trade him here and lets him hold them hostage all season.
Another thing to realize about this article… Look who wrote it. Of course he isn’t going to give the Knicks credit, he never did never will. I could care less if he thinks we have no young pieces to trade. Its funny because we have one of the youngest team in the league yet we have no young pieces? Its laughable. Lets not overreact on this. If he wants to be here he’ll come.
"You're like that old, beat down restaurant with the dirty bathrooms, weird customers and foul odor, I'm like that new shiny restaurant across the street with the bright neon lights, fishes in the floor and 2nd floor gymnasium. Why don't I have any customers?!"
by MikeTheIntern on Aug 26, 2010 9:19 PM EDT up reply actions
totally correct
as a matter of fact i think we have the second youngest team besides okc
In Donnie We Trust!
by IB on Aug 26, 2010 9:42 PM EDT up reply actions
Hahaha. See Mike? I aint all bad.
The only thing is, apparently WWW went ahead and kicked the owner in his pride sac. So if we do try to trade for him, we’ll probably have to offer at least some value. We’re probably not getting away with giving them Curry and an old pair of sneaks. Unfortunately thats probably going to mean Galo or Randolph.
Yeah you're right.
I’m not against parting with one of them like other people are. If that’s what has to be done let it be done. Its business.
And yeah, you aint all bad when its basketball we’re talking about, but over at GGN its war! lol
"You're like that old, beat down restaurant with the dirty bathrooms, weird customers and foul odor, I'm like that new shiny restaurant across the street with the bright neon lights, fishes in the floor and 2nd floor gymnasium. Why don't I have any customers?!"
by MikeTheIntern on Aug 27, 2010 12:42 AM EDT up reply actions
GangGreenNation
Jets’ SBNation blog.
"You're like that old, beat down restaurant with the dirty bathrooms, weird customers and foul odor, I'm like that new shiny restaurant across the street with the bright neon lights, fishes in the floor and 2nd floor gymnasium. Why don't I have any customers?!"
by MikeTheIntern on Aug 27, 2010 4:46 AM EDT up reply actions
thank you
at least u understand wat ive been tryna tell ppl for weeks. melo is the driver in this one. the nuggets could be stubborn but then theyd get nothing. another team can trade for melo but theyd be gettin a rental for their young pieces.
In Donnie We Trust!
by IB on Aug 26, 2010 9:41 PM EDT up reply actions
This is crazy shit
I’m also agreeing with Crackback. Although if he is willing to play for multiple teams then that could be a problem.
If Melo REALLY wants to play here then he could fight to make us keep Gallo and Randolph, but I think he wants out so badly that he would just take a trade.
Also Crackback, I apologize if I was… overzealous over on GGN with the post about salary caps. But I do have strong feelings about the lack of parity in the MLB.
I am amazed as well.
Me and Crack go at it on GGN over You Know Who. I agree with his view on the Knicks though so no violence here.
"You're like that old, beat down restaurant with the dirty bathrooms, weird customers and foul odor, I'm like that new shiny restaurant across the street with the bright neon lights, fishes in the floor and 2nd floor gymnasium. Why don't I have any customers?!"
by MikeTheIntern on Aug 27, 2010 12:56 AM EDT up reply actions
you know who?
wat the hell is ggn?
In Donnie We Trust!
by IB on Aug 27, 2010 3:05 AM EDT up reply actions
nvm
i now see…u guys are jets fans….smh
In Donnie We Trust!
by IB on Aug 27, 2010 4:36 AM EDT up reply actions
I got nothing against the Giants.
Glad they won a few years back but the Jets are painting the city Green pal!
"You're like that old, beat down restaurant with the dirty bathrooms, weird customers and foul odor, I'm like that new shiny restaurant across the street with the bright neon lights, fishes in the floor and 2nd floor gymnasium. Why don't I have any customers?!"
by MikeTheIntern on Aug 27, 2010 4:48 AM EDT up reply actions
yea..they green in the face
they need to win before they start tryin to claim the city, the city, the city yall
Jints baby
……and now back to your locally programmed P&T
"they try to do what he do, and been where he's been, but they get folded in two.....he's the dude"
i wont lie
i hope u guys get it this year. im jus a ny fan but put the giants first wen it comes to football. i look forward to seeing a ny super bowl lol hopefully goodell feels the same and chnges the venue if both teams make it
In Donnie We Trust!
by IB on Aug 27, 2010 4:25 PM EDT up reply actions
It's a riot
some of the most entertaining reading of the day
What did the 5 fingers say to the face?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7CBwX1891A
HaHaHaHa!
by Lord Smackington on Aug 27, 2010 12:19 PM EDT up reply actions
refering to
Mike and Crack, and um yea Giant’s fans got nada to worry about unless they completey fall off, us Jets fans are jus having a liil fun rite now. It’s owed to us.
What did the 5 fingers say to the face?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7CBwX1891A
HaHaHaHa!
by Lord Smackington on Aug 27, 2010 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions
I have no idea if any of this stuff is true
I really don’t. So I’m going to say good night and we’ll see what happens. I trust Donnie not to do anything stupid. I really think we should give a lowball offer and sit. Cap relief and a couple of decent young players might be the best Denver can do, if Carmelo really wants out.
we need amare or other guys to talk
we need to have guys talking to melo through back channels to gain reassurance that he ONLY wants to come to NY….if he is open to going to other teams like these rumors say…then we might be in trouble…to the point where we cant put together as good of a package…and thats the truth. We have young guys but we dont have the picks, and the picks mean a lot when you’re giving away a superstar.
get amare to talk to him, isiah, whoever….find out what his real preferences are….if its only us than it isn’t time to panic…but if it isn’t only us…than it is time to panic
if theres other teams on his list, that means get ready to lose gallo AND randolph…and even that may not do the trick.
y would it b time to panic
if we dont acquire meko, then we still got the cap room for other potential big moves.. yea melo is a big upgrade, but its not the end of the world to have gallo as our starting sf.
dwill and cp3 are still in the near future.
id keep gallo tho, and offer a package around ar and curry and chandler.
"they try to do what he do, and been where he's been, but they get folded in two.....he's the dude"
"untradeable"
how can you guys call AR or gallinari untradeable when we’re talking about carmelo anthony? I just don’t get it guys…come on now.
There is absolutely no proof whatsoever that either guy turns into an all star…let alone a perennial elite player…and everyone discounting our chances of trading for melo even with these guys shows how much of a bunch of homers we are…youtubing anthony randolph and watching jaw dropping plays doesn’t mean he’ll be an all star. And if Gallo doesn’t develop more than his shot than what do we have there?
True, BUT, these kids are 21 years old.
And while there are no guarantees, obviously, we have yet to see how AR plays on this team and he is by many accounts, a wildly talented kid who has already shown some terrific talent in limited minutes.
Gallo is not much different other than we have seen an entire season of him now.
But look, the thing is, while both of these players don’t have to be untouchable…. we are right to covet such young talent.
I’m not trying to make any comparisons here, but go look at the first 3 years of Kevin Garnett and Kobe Bryant. Garnett started putting up solid numbers in his 2nd full season (20 yrs old) but really started to come in in his 3rd-4th years and such. Kobe didn’t do shit in his 1st 2 seasons, and it wasn’t until his 4th year (22 yrs old) that his scoring avg surpassing 20ppg(22.5). Kobes 5TH year was when he really blossomed too.
Again, I’m not saying we have the next KG and Kobe, but they are excellent examples of guys with superb talent that needed time to grow. And more importantly, they started takign significant strides when they were 21years old. Interestingly, Gallo’s career has followed KGs in terms of playing time, and AR does as well though a big part of him not playing was an injury last year.
We aren’t wrong to put a high value on these two guys. Really. And we are also not the only ones who think Gallinari is an excellent player. Yes, we believe so MORE than others, but we aren’t blindly believing in him at all.
"you're the Rod Thorn in my Chris Bosh side."
by Chris Child's Fist on Aug 27, 2010 11:23 AM EDT up reply actions
Flossy is right too. We won the lottery with Anthony Randolph.
"you're the Rod Thorn in my Chris Bosh side."
by Chris Child's Fist on Aug 27, 2010 11:25 AM EDT up reply actions
I know I sound like a total homer with stars in his eyes
But I honestly believe that if Anthony Randolph commits to working hard to be great, and the Knicks commit to working with him, coaching him, and giving him a real chance to realize his potential, within 2-3 years he will be the clear-cut best player on the Knicks. And I’m talking about better than his teammates, Amar’e Stoudemire and Carmelo Anthony. The fact that he’s impossible to peg as being the next Star X is what is so tantalizing. We have literally never seen someone who combines the length, athleticism and defensive instincts of a guy like Garnett with the quickness and finesse of someone like Odom. Imagining him playing a role similar to that of Marion on the Suns makes me, like, actually drool. IMO a team should never give up on a player like that before they’re old enough to have actually graduated from college. The Warriors were insane to do it and we would be too.
Although I don’t think Gallo has that same game-changing potential, with his height, natural talent, and obvious passion and dedication, could pretty easily be a better-defending version of Peja when he was with the Kings, an elite perimeter scorer with a solid all-around game. I’ll take the chance of 20-22ppg, 6 rebounds and great defensive effort for the next what, 5-10 years? At that point, you’re not giving up a while lot in comparison to Carmelo. Again, if Gallo were at North Carolina or somewhere he’d be a senior and commentators would be surgically attached to his junk. But even better, he’s already proved he can be an impact player at an NBA level. And he costs nothing. Can we keep this kid for a little while, please?
Obviously, it’s important to keep perspective and admit that neither of these two are there yet, and Carmelo Anthony is. But I have to laugh when I read articles saying the Knicks have nothing to trade but the Nets and Clippers are in great shape because they can offer up surefire bona fide NBA superstars like Favors or Griffin, who incidentally have never played an NBA game in their respective lives. Is it worth it to possibly be a 2nd-4th seed for the next 3 years when the Denver Nuggets could be doing the same thing, with our talent?
No, I'm with you on DG and AR
And i don’t want to just annoint them the permanent Knicks future, but I really look at those 2 as being the guy who hopefully earn the opportunity to remain Knicks for the majority of their careers. I mean so few guys stay with one team start to finish and I love the idea of possibly having that.
When the Wolves drafted KG, the Lakers traded for Kobe, the Cavs drafted LeBron… I mean even though KG and LBJ are now gone, they did spend significant time with their teams… they earned the right to stay if they wanted and KG did for the majority of his career. And in those days there was really no chance that you were gonna pry away that young talent from any of those teams…even if you offered a superstar.
And I just think Gallinari and Randolph represent such a niche pairing that i would be absolutely content to assume both are untradeable for at least the next few years. Now the other part of this is that KG, Kobe, LeBron all performed. So sure that’s absolutely key. If they don’t perform… then yeah that changes everything. But i feel like both WILL perform.
And I don’t feel like my head is in the clouds in thinking this.
"you're the Rod Thorn in my Chris Bosh side."
by Chris Child's Fist on Aug 27, 2010 3:42 PM EDT up reply actions
im sorry
i agree with most of the things you said but 20-22 ppg? are u fukin shittin me…21 yrs old average 15ppg in his first full season! and then his last month he went on a tearand dropped 20.4 i believe it was. man listen im sorry for bein too optimistic but i jus dont see how he cant make the transition to 23-25 maybe even 26-28 by his 3-4th seasons. he’ll be right next to stat too. shit he literally is the secondary scorer on the team. everyones entitled to their opinion but i think most ppl look at him as another european talent that’ll be good not great.
In Donnie We Trust!
by IB on Aug 27, 2010 4:35 PM EDT up reply actions
I'm just trying not to be too optimistic
If he can “just” be the next Peja that’ll be awesome. Peja went from 12ppg in his second season to 20 in his third and stayed between 19-22ppg and 5 rb until his sixth season when he went off for 24 and 6. If Gallo can bring that kind of production and better defense our future is looking mighty bright.
points per game
Doesn’t matter – efficiency does. I think Gallo can raise his shooting percentages this year as he becomes more comfortable and works with a better point guard and without Al Harrington.
Chandler’s a guy that is a very efficient scorer from inside the arc. Kind of mediocre from 3, but so are a lot of guys. Randolph will have to get his shooting percentage up somehow – better shot selection, or just better shooting – to really take the next step but it could happen. We’ll see – looking forward to seeing those guys develop more, and to seeing what they can do with Amar’e and Felton in the lineup.
definitely
any1 who watched the knicks last season knows that early season gallo was effected by al “bricks” playing time and he had duhon for a pg…come on give the kid some credit
In Donnie We Trust!
idk
kobe dropped 15 off the bench his second season… but i do agree it takes time for players to develop, which is why i wouldnt get rid of gallo because a 6’10 almost 6’11 sharp shooter with a high arching shot and the ability to get better is jus tohard to find and sum ppl who come on here rather trade future pieces for a now player…mcdyess any1?
In Donnie We Trust!
by IB on Aug 27, 2010 4:29 PM EDT up reply actions
Yeah
When people talk about Eric Gordon, and whether he’s better than Gallo, I’m like, two words: Six. Ten.
I wouldn't say any of our players cept' Amare are untradeable but
trading players like Gallinari or AR(though personally I’d make an AR sacrifice) for Melo at this particular point in time is a bit like working countless hours of overtime and saving that money to purchase a new laptop or gaming system with top of the line features and blazing speed plus the ability to automate all your kitchen appliances to whip up a batch of brownies every hour on the hour if you so choose.
Can your current technology whip up brownies in an instant without any help…No, It doesn’t even have a high speed connection; it’s still uses dial up!
So you spend a hard earned 4 grand on a new super computer, is it awesome?…umm, did you not hear that it bakes brownies???
A solid investment, but 3 weeks later you learn an updated version of your super computer is coming out that has a beer dispenser attachment due for release this summer and so the price on your unit will be slashed down to just under 3 grand!!!
Is your super computer any worse? No, it does the same things and is much better than what you were working with b4 but you probably feel like an ass right now for paying 4 grand for something that will cost 3 in a couple of months.
If there was another year left on his deal and he wanted out no question, get it done. But now…I dunno. Not saying we shouldn’t but with him in his final year and free agency right there, I gotta think about it especially since Denver will want quality players in return. How many true quality players do we have?, how many can we afford to lose? and can we compete in the playoffs by trading all of them away for one Carmelo Anthony???
If you have to think about any of those questions too long that’s reason enough to think twice about rushing into a deal and giving Denver whatever they want for Melo.
What did the 5 fingers say to the face?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7CBwX1891A
HaHaHaHa!
by Lord Smackington on Aug 27, 2010 1:09 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Hold up, Carmelo comes with a beer tap now?
I change my mind, everyone is on the table
Spot on.
"you're the Rod Thorn in my Chris Bosh side."
by Chris Child's Fist on Aug 27, 2010 3:49 PM EDT up reply actions
Melo's awesome ubt I don't care if we miss out
We still have a solid, young team, with one superstar and two or three nice up-and-comers and so if we miss out, maybe sign a good center next summer, or another good shooter and wait until CP3 or D-Will are available and then snag them. Assuming we still have AR and Gallo, they’d be nice pieces with Amare and Paul or Williams.
For a team with a decade long history of being a laughing stock.
We sure are pretty goddamn arrogant. Just reading thru some comments is funny.
Fuck Melo we got Gallo (lol), no way they get Randolph from us, who cares if he goes to the Nets, ROFLMAO at the Bobcats. We don’t even need Melo. Like, what right do we have to laugh at other teams when we have been as bad, if not way worse then any team you want to throw out there? Suddenly we get a GM, a new coach, and we are too good for the best scorer in the league because it is gonna cost us some guy who may or may not even have any type of impactful career in the NBA?
I love the shit out of my Knicks and will root for them no matter what, but I can’t say I wouldn’t get a laugh, thinking of all you guys if in 5 years Melo and Randolph amount to nothing (like thousands of ridiculously talented players have before them) and the Knicks are still a joke. It will destroy my, but I will at least be able to find the tiniest possible bit of solitude, thinking how 5 years ago you ridiculed anybody who wanted to trade Gallo for Carmelo Anthony.
by al's brick foundation on Aug 27, 2010 1:49 AM EDT reply actions
thinking of all you guys if in 5 years Melo and Randolph amount to nothing
if gallo and randolph amount to nothing and we miss out on Melo.
by al's brick foundation on Aug 27, 2010 1:50 AM EDT up reply actions
I hear you beating the drum, wanting to trade for him. Believe me, we all do.
What’s the rush to throw this guy 22 mil a year when we don’t even know what the rules for player salaries will be next year and beyond? As willing as you seem to send out Gallo or Randolph, this would not be the Heat trading Odom and Butler for Shaq or the Celtics trading for Garnett. There is no title wrapped up by making this move.
Head to head as players, Melo is obviously better than Gallo or Randolph for that matter. Melo now is probably better than Gallo will ever be. Randolph is a different kind of player and it’d be tougher to project what he’d bring. Anyway, if signed to the extension of 3 years $65 million that’s been tossed around, Melo will make 5 times what Gallo or Randolph figures to make each of the next two years. Is Melo going to make five times the contribution Gallo does? He would need to in a salary capped league where every dollar spent matters.
More than that, the Knicks are already paying Amare ~$20 million a year for the next 5 years. With both players, the ball stops with them on offense. Melo is not a distributor and there is no guarantee his game will mesh with Amare’s. Amare is our best player and will be through the 2016 season. The question you must must MUST ask for the next five years is, “Will this guy fit with Amare?” There are no guarantees with Melo who undoubtedly sees himself as The Man on whatever team he’ll be on.
As I said before the contract that’s been mentioned with Melo averages out to around $22 million a year. The NBA salary cap sits around $60 million. Between Melo and Amare, that’d be 2/3s of your cap tied up in two players. It makes less sense when there is no guarantee the new guy will fit with your current centerpiece. It would be even zanier when you’re trading guys who are on their rookie deals for the privilege of spending that money. More terrible would be to do it when you can get him as a free agent in a year. Worse than that would be to do it the year before the rules change, preventing players from making as much as $22 million in a season.
The new CBA is hanging over all of this, whether or not you want to see it. If the owners get their way – and they do in every sport but baseball – contracts paying players 22 million dollars will be a thing of the past. It makes no sense to trade whatever it takes for Melo. Even if Gallo were to end up as Keith Van Horn with a bad back and Anthony Randolph doesn’t ever do shit (despite flashing some generational talent so far).
by Dutchmarau on Aug 27, 2010 4:05 AM EDT up reply actions 6 recs
I am sure that Donnie
feels the same way. Dutch is right on the mark
Thats exactly on point
It’s not JUST about trading Gallo and/or Randolph. There are a lot of angles here.
"you're the Rod Thorn in my Chris Bosh side."
by Chris Child's Fist on Aug 27, 2010 11:31 AM EDT up reply actions
I think Melo fits with Amar'e offensively fine.
It’s the defensive part I’m worried about.
I mean, when Iverson was Carmelo’s age, everyone gushed over him and called him one of the best players in the league. Now, the guy’s legacy is someone who could score like crazy, but also took a lot of shots, and who didn’t buy into things like defense and practice 100%. Melo’s twice the good citizen Iverson was, and he’s a lot bigger and stronger, but again, I don’t see how a team anchored by Amar’e and Melo is going to have the defensive committment to win a championship.
I could be wrong but I don’t think that Melo’s awesome offensive skills make this a no-brainer.
I see what you are getting at, but I disagree on the Iverson perception
No one will argue in favor of Iverson’s off the court mentality. But he was an excellent defender, especially given his height. No, his ‘practice’ quote never did him any favors, but he also was a guy who took a lot of shots because he HAD to. Iverson did what his team needed and most of the time they needed someone to score. He racked up plenty of assists though. He was much different than say a Monta Ellis.
But I DO see what you are getting at.
"you're the Rod Thorn in my Chris Bosh side."
by Chris Child's Fist on Aug 27, 2010 3:47 PM EDT up reply actions
Iverson's probably a bad comparison
Maybe Dominique Wilkins or Clyde Drexler. Great players, no doubt. Needed to be surrounded by defense guys and weren’t always.
I don't think anyone is saying that
No one is denying Carmelo Anthony’s talent or the fact he could help this team. Maybe I’m out of place but I think the feeling is that while we would all welcome him, obtaining his services should be done in the most responsible manner as possible, the debate being which manner is in fact the most responsible.
What did the 5 fingers say to the face?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7CBwX1891A
HaHaHaHa!
by Lord Smackington on Aug 27, 2010 1:27 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Right. At least for me, you got it right
It really feels like in order to land him, the deal might have to look like Isiah’s Eddy Curry deal. Not a responsible move, even if it lands us a superstar.
"you're the Rod Thorn in my Chris Bosh side."
by Chris Child's Fist on Aug 27, 2010 3:48 PM EDT up reply actions
If we got Melo then WE'D be the ones paying him 22 mil a year
Why not see what the new CBA brings? If the owners have their way (they usually do in situations like this, across all pro sports), 22 million a year will be far, far beyond what players will be able to make next year. We’re already paying Amare a salary that probably won’t be possible in a year. This is how you fuck up your cap, again, after spending two years to fix it. Fuck Melo, fuck these players whose camps make ultimatums. Let the young’uns spin.
word.
either take a “lowball offer” (Chandler + Curry’s corpse + scraps) or wait till he’s a FA. I throw in the towel.
Or at least wait till the trading deadline, I wanna see this team in action first. No one knows a god damn thing about how this team will play yet.
And if Melo’s on another team before that…fuck em.
by FreeBradshaw on Aug 27, 2010 6:38 AM EDT up reply actions
with you 100% free
It’s been along, long time since we’ve had so many strong assets and to be honest most critics (not that I listen to em)disagree and wanna debate the strength of those said assets, not really believing we have much to offer outside of Amare.
Point is, for a team who has not had much in the way of success over the last decade it is easy to want to blow our load so to speak on one player not thinking about the repercussions because by now we just wanna win. But the number of assets and tools we’d be forced to give up to obtain a Carmello Anthony may put us at a disadvantage both cap wise and on the floor.
What did the 5 fingers say to the face?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7CBwX1891A
HaHaHaHa!
by Lord Smackington on Aug 27, 2010 2:12 PM EDT up reply actions
I just don't see it as the right situation to blow said load, nah mean?
What are the Knicks if they go and make a trade for Carmelo? They Chip material? I say unequivocally ABSOLUTLEY THE FUCK NOT. They ain’t winning a chip with Melo this year if they make a trade.
So why do it? What are we doing? We’re rebuilding. The iron is not right to strike. We’re essentially “selling low” to tread water in terms of rebuilding.
They may take a bit of a step ahead from what they are now, but how far of a step ahead? We go from an 8 seed to a 4? 5 to a 4? Who gives a shit?
Unless we’re getting Ray Allen AND KG…are we getting TWO superstars? No. Are we getting Shaq? No.
No trade.
by FreeBradshaw on Aug 27, 2010 3:27 PM EDT up reply actions
Couple things.
1. Nuggets aren’t taking a lowball offer. An unhappy Melo is worth way more than Wilson Chandler and garbage, so lets stop even considering that possibility.
2. Melo’s signing this year, no matter what. He stands to lose too much by waiting for the restructuring. Even if he wanted to wait (he probably doesn’t), his grubby agents won’t let that happen. Every player takes max money when they can. Lebron is an exception to the rule, don’t get it twisted.
3. There won’t just be an immediate hard-cap next year. They’ll build in a few transition years, or a least a type of grandfather clause, so that teams can integrate pricier contracts into the new restructuring without destroying their team’s plan. If Melo is signed for 22 mill a year, treat it as though it was done with the current CBA, not the future one, because there’ll be exceptions for this type of thing. And its a drop in the bucket for Dolan.
4. Conversely, waiting till next year when salaries might have to be signed under the umbrella of the hard cap, the plan of waiting it out and getting Gallo, Randolph and Melo is even less likely. In a hard cap scenario, teams won’t be able to go over and sign guys whose Bird Rights they own. They’ll still need to be under the cap. Even without Melo, if Gallo and Randolph play amazingly well the next two years, they’ll both be in line for raises that we probably won’t be able to give both of them. Letting our assets appreciate in a hard-cap scenario could force us to give one of them up no matter what.
5. Just try and remember a situation where a superstar worth getting is available for less than what the Knicks would have to give for Melo. Waiting around for this type of shit is suuuper risky. Either these guys are drafted and locked up forever, signed in free agency for max deals at max length, or traded for a fucking king’s ransom. Acting like we can wait around and low-ball teams for superstars is ridiculous. Amare’s peak is another 3 years, so our window isnt exactly open forever.
Don’t know what I’d do, but some of ya’ll are way out in the stratosphere with this one.
"But when he saw it, he just put his hands up and they couldn’t give it to him. It just fell to the ground, I-I don’t, you know … So, that showed me he had great experience..." - Jeff Van Gundy
by Anthony Bonner's Subpoena on Aug 27, 2010 10:49 AM EDT reply actions 2 recs
couple of things I agree with and don't
points 3 &4 agree 100 percent, however on point 4 with or without a new agreement I don’t know how far they’d go to keep both if they outperformed their current pay grade.
Point 1, Nuggets will take what they get and like it or get nothing. If Melo is serious on not signing, They’ll either end up with nothing like the Cavs or crawl back to the table like Toronto to only get a couple of not so great draft picks(which they were lucky to get because they didn’t have to get anything)
Point 2, most players take max money…Lebron is an exception, those guys in Boston another there are also a couple more including if I’m not mistaken but ur right the majority take the dough and run. For anyone to conclude from this that they definitely know what Melo will do obviously has not learned from the Lebron James drama. All it takes are a couple exceptions strung together before an exception becomes the norm. Everything is what it is until it is what it aint.
And point 5, It’s a risk either way whether we get him now or wait. If we get him now there is always the chance He doesn’t fit with the left over pieces, or maybe he does fit but it’s still not enough to get us to the playoffs let alone a finals. And the players we part with? Regardless of their numbers players of their skill and physical ability don’t grow on trees. And with alot less money to work with and fewer draft picks if Melo doesn’t deliver a chip right away( like he did with Denver…oh,wait!) then we are still stuck without the flexibility or luxury of being able to upgrade anytime soon, definately not in the 2-3 years everyone says Amare has left.
What did the 5 fingers say to the face?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7CBwX1891A
HaHaHaHa!
by Lord Smackington on Aug 27, 2010 3:18 PM EDT up reply actions
i doubt it
stern’s not stupid. a hard cap will put too many people out the league tho it will stop teams from doing the miami trio and help create parity it also would create competition in the form of oversea ballers. think about it. stay here and make 10mil a year or go to europe make 20mil a year and more with enodrsements. thinking about it from a business standpoint the hard cap helped create parity within the nhl but so many good market teams have fluttered ( rangers) and sum players rather stay in europe to play hockey. im not a hockey fan but i read enough about it to know they get paid much less the nba players which is a testament to the league popularity overall within the states. and the hard cap was only mentioned in the article, i dont think stern would use it. maybe he would do the franchise tag but that’ll be stupid too because teams dont carry much players so i’d consider it to be restricting to the players and i dont think stern would want the players to be mad because wat would the nba be without its players
In Donnie We Trust!
by IB on Aug 27, 2010 4:47 PM EDT up reply actions
It seems,
people are willing to have a mediocre team and compete for a low playoff spot for years into the future rather than take any chance on the big prize today. I’ve read about Dwill and CP3 and keeping options open for them. I’ve read that we want to keep affordable talent because they’re affordable and not because they afford us a chance at a division or Conference much less a league title. I’ve read that Melo isn’t part of a road to winning it all (even though we all agree he’s definitely an upgrade to the current roster). I’ve read about Gallo and Randy being untradeable assets and on the bubble of great breakout years because of their age and potential. I’ve read about not wanting a repeat of Marbury, yet I bet there’s not a person here that wasn’t psyched about acquiring him when we did (lots of hindsight though). I’ve read about not wagering our futures for a possible today, when tomorrow is not garenteed… to anyone.
I’ve been a Knick fan most of my life and want to see us back as winners. I am NOT happy watching another sub-par 30-40 win year. I am NOT confident we will do anything more than stay afloat when teams like Chicago, Orlando, & Miami are going to continue to flourish…. years into the future. I do NOT believe we are front runners for guys like DWill and CP3. I do not want to wait for the free agents that may never come (and almost never do).
Yes, we are much improved from ly squad, and I am happy and excited about that….but not at all satisfied we are able to compete for greatness. That my friends is the goal. If a deal can be put in place to make NY more Melo, I’m for it. Obviously. LOL
"Umm - it was - you know - umm - a good game. You know."-
Patrick Ewing (my Knick Hero)
yup, but at least we will be mediocre with our own home grown players (not really, just gallo)
After 10 years of losing people are happy we are going to win like 35-40 games this year, and don’t want Melo. It really is laughable.
Yes, we are much improved from ly squad, and I am happy and excited about that….but not at all satisfied we are able to compete for greatness. That my friends is the goal. If a deal can be put in place to make NY more Melo, I’m for it. Obviously. LOL
This. Obviously we are better, we are much improved, so why stop now?
by al's brick foundation on Aug 27, 2010 1:16 PM EDT up reply actions
I am not happy with 35-40 wins
I look at this team and I see 45-50 wins this year. Just because they’re the Knicks and the Knicks have sucked for many years does not mean that they’re not going to sniff .500.
I just have doubts that Carmelo is at the level of Kobe, LeBron, Jordan, Pippen, et cetera, because I don’t think the defensive desire is there. To me, he might be more of a Clyde Drexler / Dominique Wilkins type of guy.
That’s why I’m worried about giving up too much for him. It’s not because I don’t care about winning. I’m just worried he’s one of those guys that scores a lot of points and never wins a championship.
Melo is a 1A type of player
that’s what he is. I don’t even think he’s as beneficial to your team as Amare, cuz Amare shoots a much higher percentage cuz he’s a big.
I’d love to sign Melo as a FA, but to trade what essentially amounts to a 1A for him, I ain’t doing it.
No one knows what the players on this team will be this year. No one. They are what they were, but they can and most likely will given that there is no Al Harrington (or Carmelo Anthony) style ballhog on the roster to take away shots.
by FreeBradshaw on Aug 27, 2010 3:19 PM EDT up reply actions
that part of his game (ballhogging)
is unsidputably Al Hannington’ish.
Lets not get too happy riding Melo’s nuts, he’s a ballhog.
by FreeBradshaw on Aug 27, 2010 5:22 PM EDT up reply actions
I think you guys are missing the points being made. Seriously.
You seem to believe that we don’t want Carmelo Anthony because we already have young guns who are gonna develop into all-world players.
You should reread a few of Lord Smackington’s posts in this thread.
He points out that its just not as simple as that. Of fuckign course we want Carmelo Anthony. But you are not considering the substantial cost to get him.
Do you remember NBA history? Go refresh yourself on Kevin Garnetts history with Minnesota. They never made it past the 1st round of the playoffs. A HUGE part of that was that KG was making max money and the Timberwolves had almost nothing to use to surround him with better talent.
Do you realize that one of the big things about the next CBA is not only to have less expensive player contracts, but also to help lessen player movement? Also, the team salary cap is very likely going to be a hard cap eventually and even if some of the current salaries are grandfathered into this agreement we are talking about having TWO players accounting for over $40 Million of our annual salary cap.
Now, I don’t give a giant grey squirrel’s gonads about what this does to Dolan’s pockets, but can you honestly tell me that you would be ok with absolutely KILLING our options at flexibility in the future? Hey what happens should Amar’e’s knee give out? What if Carmelo makes another rap video and gets his arm broken? What if we lose one of those guys for a season? Do we just throw in the towel that year? Cus we sure as shit won’t have the money to bring in another player and what fucking team would want to trade for a guy who has a significant injury AND is pulling in $22 Million by himself???
THOSE things make this shit all sorts of fucking grey. It is NOT about comparing Gallo the player or Randolph the player or any other Knick players to Carmelo Anthony the player.
It’s about the Knicks building a winner and REMAINING a winner. Shit, did you realize that you can actually win a lot of games AND remain fiscally responsible AND even keep your draft picks (which we already are low on)??? There is a team with a few championships out in San Antonio… maybe you have heard of them.
You may think that us defending the keeping of Gallo and/or Randolph are just silly idiots, but I think we are balancing short term with long term and realizing that we may just have some incredible talent that is not only cheaper right now, but might just end up being players other teams covet like Oklahoma City and Kevin Durant.
"you're the Rod Thorn in my Chris Bosh side."
by Chris Child's Fist on Aug 27, 2010 4:17 PM EDT up reply actions
perfect points
going to get melo now would only fuck our payroll and cost us talent.
In Donnie We Trust!
by IB on Aug 27, 2010 4:50 PM EDT up reply actions
Garnett lost
because he kept waiting for McHale to surround him with another star and he didnt. You cant win in the league with just one star. Your argument suggest we should get Melo cuz he’s a guy to pair with Amare.
And the point of having flexibility isn’t having it for its own sake. Its so you can go out and get stars. Which is what we can do. If you hold onto Gallo and AR its cuz you’re keeping them as players, not as potential trading chips. Flexibility factors in very little here. There are NO players except for Chris Paul who will available in the next two years that are better than Melo. Lebron, Wade, Kobe, Durant, D-Will, Howard, Dirk… name anyone. Theyre locked up. Or if theyre available, you’ll need to give up waay more than what you’ll need for Melo right now.
We REALIZE the NATURE of THIS TRADE. Its just we THINK you’re being IRRATIONAL for overvaluing CERTAIN GUYS and OVER-EXAGGERATING how much it LIMITS our CAP.
Max contracts for studs are actually some of the best values in theleague and it in no way cripples the rest of the team if you’re smart about it. Guys like Lebron, Wade and I’ll include Melo, would go for way more than the max on the open market. It’s a owner-benefit that their contracts are capped. Houston basically had two max guys sit out all of last season for them and still almost made the playoffs. If you put Melo and Amare on that squad, you have an instant contender.
Also, I dont think you need to include both AR and Gallo, but you definitely need to include one of em. The Nugs will take under market value, but they wont take 10 cents on the dollar.
"But when he saw it, he just put his hands up and they couldn’t give it to him. It just fell to the ground, I-I don’t, you know … So, that showed me he had great experience..." - Jeff Van Gundy
by Anthony Bonner's Subpoena on Aug 27, 2010 5:59 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I'd rather "over-value" certain guys who happen to have ideal contracts than get drawn into a trade that could end up costing us more than money
The Knicks have done it before too
"you're the Rod Thorn in my Chris Bosh side."
by Chris Child's Fist on Aug 28, 2010 9:09 AM EDT up reply actions
You talk about
“Better” but it’s not that simple. Chris Paul gets a lot of steals and plays very good D. So does Garnett. Melo, not so much. Amar’e, not so much. Are those the two stars you want to pair?
Not to belittle Melo at all but having two offensively minded guys as your two superstars is not a good formula for winning a championship.
Here's what it comes down to, for me
—Would trading Randolph and Gallo for Carmelo improve our roster this year? Probably, leaning towards definitely (depends how the youngn’s progress).
—Would a core of Amar’e, Carmelo, Felton be enough to win a chip this year? Definitely not.
—Will it ever be enough? Probably not.
—Would having Amar’e and Carmelo each signed to $20mm/year contracts basically cripple our ability to add major impact players down the line? Yep.
Look, if adding Carmelo was the last piece on the road to building a dynasty I would say do it, who needs those kids anyway, we are about to start a trophy collection. But if you’re really all about winning a chip, you know we’ll need more than just two offensive-minded stars to get it down. We’ll need at least one, more like to serious impact players—maybe not on Carmelo and Amare’s level, but the equivalent on Bynum/Odom/Artest on the Lakers right now. Given how expensive Amar’e and Carmelo are going to be, by far our best chance to surround them with the talent needed to win will be to acquire it young and cheap and develop it ourselves.
We won’t have any more good draft picks for a long time. Talents like Gallo and Randolph, at their age and price, come along very, very rarely. We need to think long and hard about the wisdom of shoving them both out the door for a guy whose presence alone will not put us over the top.
AND, you know what?
If Carmelo signs an extension with Houston or the Nets or whatever, then fuck him. There was a path to the Knicks and he chose not to take it. I’m over it. Our team is the best it’s been in a decade, and I’m good to go. Of course I would like him to join us, but he is not more important than the other 14 guys on the roster.
agreed, agreed, agreed in so many ways
and since I like analogies, it’s kinda like
me in the mood for a Carmello meal at mickey D’s cuz I saw it on TV and I could spend my last 7 bucks on it now or wait till six when my homeboy gets on shift and hooks me up. I ate before so what I can live what I just had but that commercial does have me fiendin, I can’t get it outta my head.
If I wait there is always the chance my homie calls out sick or the manager blocks my hookup but I spend the last of this money, I don’t get paid again for a looong time so I might wanna hang on to that.
What did the 5 fingers say to the face?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7CBwX1891A
HaHaHaHa!
by Lord Smackington on Aug 27, 2010 2:32 PM EDT up reply actions
It's more like
I’m at McD’s chowin down on a quarter pounder with cheese, and I look over and see that that ad about the homestyle angus burger, and I think to myself, I could get one of those , that would be the slammin’ bomb , yeah, uh-huh…
But really, to be a healthy individual and live a long and strong life I need to eat the right balance of foods. So while some culinary items taste so fucking good, I have to remember that I need my share of the whole grains and vegetables along with the fat-tastic protein meatiness.
that also good...thx
I’m getting hungry now, I should hav my computer bake some brownies and pour me some beer in the meantime
What did the 5 fingers say to the face?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7CBwX1891A
HaHaHaHa!
by Lord Smackington on Aug 27, 2010 3:23 PM EDT up reply actions
hell fuckin yea
i’ve been sayin gallo and ar is equal to melo and more. gallo basically does wat melo does and thats score but hes younger and we’re still gettin a feel for his game but from wat i sense is that he wants to be good at everything that encourages me. and ar shit the kid can hop like bugs! but the only thing thats bothering me is that amare is around the corner from thirty
In Donnie We Trust!
the problem with it is...
is you don’t know what to make of our team. No one does.
Everyone who has 1/3 of a brain knows their improved, but to what extent? There’s a lot of unknown here, lot of young players. Lot of factors like…what does Amare do now that he’s the undisputed King Dick on his team?
The black hole that is Al Harrington, what does that do for players like Gallo and Chandler and DWTDD?
What about Felton? Speculation either says he’s gonna be the same or slightly better under Pringles…but who with a straight face can say they know 100% that’s true?
Melo’s a better player then all except for Amare on the team, yes. Him and Amare could make for a dynamic duo..ditto.
I’d rather see what we got first. If Melo gets traded to the Nets, Rockets or whoever in the meantime…I don’t give a shit. He signs the contract…oh well.
Anyone that simply says this team is automatically mediocre is simply flat out, talking out of their asshole. You don’t know what they can be. The Bucks came out of nowhere last year, why can’t that be the Knicks? They don’t have an Amare on that team either.
by FreeBradshaw on Aug 27, 2010 3:14 PM EDT up reply actions
and I for one think this team as is, are much better than the bucks
What did the 5 fingers say to the face?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7CBwX1891A
HaHaHaHa!
by Lord Smackington on Aug 27, 2010 3:26 PM EDT up reply actions
We don't have anyone on our team like Corey Magette
that’s got to be good for a few wins right there.
Why is it a better idea
to take a chance with an unknown than to use those assets to acquire a known stud?
"But when he saw it, he just put his hands up and they couldn’t give it to him. It just fell to the ground, I-I don’t, you know … So, that showed me he had great experience..." - Jeff Van Gundy
by Anthony Bonner's Subpoena on Aug 27, 2010 6:01 PM EDT up reply actions
har har
"But when he saw it, he just put his hands up and they couldn’t give it to him. It just fell to the ground, I-I don’t, you know … So, that showed me he had great experience..." - Jeff Van Gundy
by Anthony Bonner's Subpoena on Aug 29, 2010 10:08 AM EDT up reply actions
no, he isn't on the mark
listen…you can’t be stuck in the middle. Right now this team is stuck in the middle…we have a guy on a 100 Million dollar deal surrounded by young guns. Donnie isn’t going to waste Amare’s best years trying to develop gallo and AR, he’s going to try and put another superstar next to him. Does he want to retain one of those 2 guys? Yes..absolutely. Amare is a good move, but if we stop here and try to develop our young guys, it was a move made in vain. Amare isn’t going to win a ton of games for this team the way carmelo will….he’s not going to make the guys around him much better than david lee did. He’s a power forward, there’s only so much he can do…
The goal isn’t to “get young” guys. If that was the goal we wouldn’t have traded draft picks away. We didn’t sacrifice the last two years to wait more years to become a contender, because without a move we’re not contending for shit this year and probably next year too, barring AR or Gallo completely exploding…which everyone on here thinks is a total and complete guarantee.
Why does everyone think Melo is going to wait until free agency too? Everyone keeps saying “we can get him as a free agent this summer anyway.” Doesn’t it look pretty obvious that his free agency summer won’t be happening?
you act like Gallo and AR are rookies.
this is both’s third year.
I’ll mention this everywhere so hopefully its sticks, the Knicks are NOT a contender with or without Melo. Boom.
So, this year is a rebuilding year no matter what. Either they shoot their load and hope that Amare and Melo can build some chemistry with who’s ever left and then retool for 2011.
OR they can maintain cap flexibility, develop further the youngins when in 3rd years, many players show what they actually got.
Then if they need to, they can make a trade for someone who actually is someone who can make a team a lot better…like Chris Paul or Deron Williams.
by FreeBradshaw on Aug 27, 2010 4:05 PM EDT up reply actions
honestly free
sum ppl just dont get it. they just wanna be in the win now situation but wit melo and no team we still wont win. amare and melo and who else? we barely have picks now and with both melo and amare takin up cap space we wont even really be able to sign players
In Donnie We Trust!
by IB on Aug 27, 2010 4:52 PM EDT up reply actions
and once again
melo only bring good scoring. nuttin else in terms of defense and getting others involved
In Donnie We Trust!
by IB on Aug 27, 2010 4:53 PM EDT up reply actions
why is it obvious his free agency summer won't happen?
because “sources” say a trade is imminent or he’ll sign his deal first? “Sources” also said Lebron would re-sign in Cleveland…wait….wait, no make that NY, no, no NJ…dammmit Chicago.
No one knows but Anthony, anything else is speculation. And if we even have pieces the Nuggets would accept it’s not certain Anthony would work with the left over pieces? Denver had a very talented team…better than we had last year,is that better than what we have this year? If so by how much? Again, speculation…It’s not even assured adding Melo will get us into the playoffs if we do get him.
On a personal level, would love to see Anthony here, not sure if it’s the smartest thing for the team to move on right now though even if we risk losing him later.
We’d give up cap space, probably at least two of our best players AND draft picks. That’s a bit much when you consider we haven’t much of any of those things over the last 5 yrs. And after all that Carmelo still doesn’t guarantee us a playoff spot…fuck that, a time machine and Michael Jordan circa 1992 doesn’t guarantee us a playoff spot.
If we even were able to keep or obtain a 1st rd pick I might be more so inclined to at least rethink this.
What did the 5 fingers say to the face?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7CBwX1891A
HaHaHaHa!
by Lord Smackington on Aug 27, 2010 4:18 PM EDT up reply actions
History has shown that these 3rd years are to years when guys tend to explode.
No guarantees obviously, but these pieces are in some shocking interestin places.
And it might just be that we wins games like the Thunder did last year. Does anyone think the Thunder are getting worse or better?
"you're the Rod Thorn in my Chris Bosh side."
by Chris Child's Fist on Aug 27, 2010 4:24 PM EDT up reply actions
I would rather take a gamble on being last year's Thunder, this year
Than lock myself into being the Hawks for the next 3-4 years
by flossy on Aug 27, 2010 4:26 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
u know what that statement is...
it’s gold….that’s what it is …gold
What did the 5 fingers say to the face?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7CBwX1891A
HaHaHaHa!
by Lord Smackington on Aug 27, 2010 4:37 PM EDT up reply actions
lmao you guys are hilarious
Yeah we’ll be just like last years thunder without a player 1/10th of what kevin durant is…that will magically happen.
The thunder were young, but they also had the league MVP? duh?
How can you even compare the knicks to the thunder right now…literally the only comparison is that we are both young. We don’t have an impact player remotely close to durant.
Comparing joe johnson to Melo is also a retarded statement….if we gave melo a 3 year extension he’d be 29 when it was done…we wouldnt be offering him 120 million at the age of 30.
Another thing you guys keep saying is that we can’t add pieces if we do this deal, the MLE can be used every year and if you think that quality free agents wouldn’t be slobbering over NY’s MLE each year the same way they will be for the Heat’s, your nuts. I’m willing to be we can get tony parker with the MLE this summer if we get carmelo beforehand.
You gotta trade gallo in this situation…i just bought the friggen guys jersey last month, but come on people. Randolph fits into the situation perfectly and his upside athletically is ridiculous. If we can still keep him this is the sickest deal ever.
Felton Chandler/buike Melo AR Amare?
insane team
by James Angelo on Aug 27, 2010 6:25 PM EDT up reply actions
poof!!!!!
Amare Stoudemire.
Like magic.
by FreeBradshaw on Aug 27, 2010 6:34 PM EDT up reply actions
Durant didn't win MVP, duh?
Yeah he’s better than anyone we’ve got but if both Gallo and AR break out this year their collective contribution will be > Durant alone (or Carmelo alone) not to mention much cheaper. The Thunder also have no big man like Stat. Westbrook is an exciting young player but with big holes in his game.
The point is, at this time last year nobody thought the Thunder were going to be contending for a ring anytime soon, now they do. That could be us next year.
On the other hand, everybody knows the Hawks will make the playoffs this year, and probably next year, and maybe the year after that. But they will probably never win a ring with a core of Johnson/Horford/Josh Smith. Just like it’s fair to say that Amar’e/Carmelo/Felton without Randolph and Gallo will probably never get us past Miami.
What makes you think the MLE will even still exist after next year? And WHAT on earth makes you think Tony Parker is taking $6m/year to play anywhere??? Even Felton got more than the MLE, come on man.
uhm
I’d take a 3 time all star, 1 time all nba team, 3 time champion as our point guard any day.
And i want to stare at his wife.
by James Angelo on Aug 27, 2010 7:21 PM EDT up reply actions
a tiny, shoot-first PG with a ton of miles on him, who plays bad D
Will want max $ or close to it, and will be on the decline from the moment we sign him?
No.
not max
hence why i quoted the MLE
if he wants to be here for that price he can be, and id gladly take him
by James Angelo on Aug 27, 2010 7:24 PM EDT up reply actions
it is known that Parker wants the max
Stoudemire also has reached out to others, such as the Spurs’ Tony Parker , who is seeking a full max extension after his contract expires next summer. source
There are a million more articles out there like that. LOL you can’t call people homers for thinking Gallo and Randolph will be stars and seriously expect Tony Parker to take the freakin’ midlevel exception because he wants to be play for the Knicks so bad. Shit, why doesn’t Carmelo just take the MLE? His wife loves NYC too.
Parker is not an option
I agree. Too many miles. In the league since 18, lots of deep playoff runs, plus French team commitments. He’s a fast player who isnt fast anymore.
"But when he saw it, he just put his hands up and they couldn’t give it to him. It just fell to the ground, I-I don’t, you know … So, that showed me he had great experience..." - Jeff Van Gundy
by Anthony Bonner's Subpoena on Aug 27, 2010 7:38 PM EDT up reply actions
Well, then how would you feel about
a 7 time all-star, 7x All-Star, 7x All NBA Team (2x ALL-NBA 1st Team), and 2x scoring champion?
Cus Tracy McGrady could have been had for less than $6Mil….
"you're the Rod Thorn in my Chris Bosh side."
by Chris Child's Fist on Aug 28, 2010 9:19 AM EDT up reply actions
If your operating under the principles of
assembling a team that can beat Miami, then good fuggin luck with that. Doesn’t matter if you keep Gallo or trade him for Larry Bird, the Heat are going to be better than the Knicks as long as they have Wade and Bron.
And just because the Thunder is everyones second favorite team doesn’t mean they resemble any other situation in the league. 4 of their starting 5 were drafted within the first 5 picks of the draft (Westbrook, Harden, Durant, and Green). And just about everyone predicted that they’d take a huge leap last season. Plus there is no comparison to Kevin Durant in NBA history. He’s a once in a lifetime player.
"But when he saw it, he just put his hands up and they couldn’t give it to him. It just fell to the ground, I-I don’t, you know … So, that showed me he had great experience..." - Jeff Van Gundy
by Anthony Bonner's Subpoena on Aug 27, 2010 6:45 PM EDT up reply actions
If we're not looking to build a team that can go through MIA for the ring
… what are we doing?
I don't like it one bit
but there aint a team in the league that can beat the Heat. Its gonna be a slaughterfest every night. They might bench the starters after the first half.
(Please lets not talk about this.)
"But when he saw it, he just put his hands up and they couldn’t give it to him. It just fell to the ground, I-I don’t, you know … So, that showed me he had great experience..." - Jeff Van Gundy
by Anthony Bonner's Subpoena on Aug 27, 2010 7:53 PM EDT up reply actions
I would bench the starters whenver possible if I were the Heat
That team is one injury away from being back to merely “quite good”. Mike Miller, Udonis Haslam, Mario Chalmers and a cardboard cutout of Zydrunas Ilgauskas does not impress me at all. When you consider the massive expectations and the fact the LeBron and Bosh have been known to fold like cheap lawn chairs under pressure…
I’m not saying they won’t win rings, I think they definitely will. But, there will also be opportunities to beat them over the next 5 years. And we should aim to be good enough (and that means deep enough) to take advantage. That may not be where we are at this moment but if our own players improve and we can add a guy like Carmelo down the line (or do something else—I’m sure Walsh has a pretty good plan B up his sleeve like he did for LeBron) while keeping our young core, we could get there.
and lets not forget
they all got close to max deals…which means theyll have to draft great…o wait they traded their picks…and on top of everything as gud as lebron and wade are its still basketball ppl are immortal and the only one who shows the passion for clutchin is wade so on that note he’s 6’4 and lebron is 6’8, i bring that up because our first 4 is taller or at the same height smh. we are legitimately going to get better and potentially great
In Donnie We Trust!
mike miller
mike miller makes it rain and will space the floor like crazy for that team…he’ll by poppin threes with one hand tied behind his back….
by James Angelo on Aug 27, 2010 11:38 PM EDT up reply actions
Can we stop handing the title to Miami already??
Seriously.
"you're the Rod Thorn in my Chris Bosh side."
by Chris Child's Fist on Aug 28, 2010 9:24 AM EDT up reply actions
my apologies
runner up for mvp and the scoring champ for the year
by James Angelo on Aug 27, 2010 7:07 PM EDT up reply actions
terrible comparison
comparing the knicks with amare felton melo with joe johnson horford and josh smith is totally ridiculous. Melo blows johnson out of the water and amare blows josh smith out of the water…not even close.
Whether solid players would be willing to take the MLE or whatever form of it remains after the new CBA, i’d be willing to gamble on that.
There must be a a lot of met fans on this site, because you guys seem to be content with “seeing how this team plays out” and not making big time moves.
I’m done ranting, I look forward to seeing this team whether its with melo or the young dudes.
by James Angelo on Aug 27, 2010 7:18 PM EDT up reply actions
no one is comparing the talent but the situation
and the way in which the team was built. Also I’d be happy as a pig in a blanket if Melo was here, do I think we should give up Gallo to do it…No…Is Gallo better than Melo…No….then why not?…simple, because we don’t need to.
I don’t think trading Gallanari plus whoever else and picks for Anthony gets us a championship in the next 3 years. If it was straight up Curry and Gallo nothing else I could digest that more but to sacrifice more players plus picks in addition to Gallinari, if it doesn’t get us anything less than a title it is a bit much to digest especially considering that you have the option to wait out until free agency.
If we were a healthy franchise with all our draft picks and a proven bench in a proven system sure….but this franchise is the total opposite of that, built on a house of cards where one little slip can make the whole thing collapse.
We currently have a number of things going for us, future picks(no 1st rd next yr but still) depth and cap room. I’m pretty sure Denver will want all of that. Once we have Carmelo, I’m sure he’ll play well but even with that I doubt we’re immediate contenders so why rush a deal and offer more than we have to? Just not good business sense.
What did the 5 fingers say to the face?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7CBwX1891A
HaHaHaHa!
by Lord Smackington on Aug 27, 2010 7:19 PM EDT up reply actions
who says
Who says that this situation is going to wait until free agency? Isn’t it blatantly clear the nuggets are going to move him ASAP? THERE ISN’T GOING TO BE A FREE AGENCY WITH MELO!
by James Angelo on Aug 27, 2010 7:23 PM EDT up reply actions
no that's not clear
until the denver nuggets actually issue a statement that says’s so. And even if or when this happens they can still take a hardline approach and not deal him at all much like Toronto with Chris Bosh.
They have his rights.
It may not be smart to play hard ball but honestly they could do whatever the hell they feel like doing, maybe even just to be spiteful trade him to a team the Clippers
Melo has some leverage being that if they don’t deal him he can just up and leave & they’ll get nada but again….no one knows what Melo will do but Melo, his wife may have a change of heart, MTV may start a new series in Denver or sumthin, Denver could pull off a trade to make itself more attractive.
What you are suggesting is that you know precisely what will happen and so we must move now and give Denver whatever they want for one player. This notion is kinda ridiculous because unless you are secretly Carmelo himself no one can say he won’t got to free agency with certainty. Even the so called “experts” are only putting together educated(if u call it that) guesses based on bits and pieces of 3rd party knowledge.
What did the 5 fingers say to the face?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7CBwX1891A
HaHaHaHa!
by Lord Smackington on Aug 27, 2010 9:38 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
You got a source for that inside info? just outta curiousity Miss Cleo
What did the 5 fingers say to the face?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7CBwX1891A
HaHaHaHa!
by Lord Smackington on Aug 27, 2010 10:08 PM EDT up reply actions
wow ur really slo
u dont know wat melo is telling them. u ever did business b4? its like selling anything. u say other are interested and the product will be gone soon, forcing the buyer to consider the time table as well as the need for the product. smh u cant be from ny
In Donnie We Trust!
good business sense
is not taking gambles with unknowns, its getting proven assets.
Carmelo is a proven asset.
And everyone needs to stop acting like anthony randolph has been on this team for 5 years, he hasn’t touched the court yet so your man crushes on him are ridiculous.
by James Angelo on Aug 27, 2010 7:27 PM EDT up reply actions
Carmelo has proven
He is a great scorer that can get to the playoffs and not much further with the Denver Nuggets.
If he comes to the Knicks he’ll more than likely still be a great scorer but we are not the Nuggets, Are we gonna be as competitive as Denver, with Carmelo minus Gallo/and or AR? Talk about risks we’re risking possibly 2 young players, cap space AND draft picks for one dude.
You are reading me wrong…I never said Carmello is not worth it, cuz he is but if it didn’t work out for any reason and we gave up that much we’d set ourselves back possibly another 3 yrs.
Put it this way…If we have the assets to pull a player of Carmello’s stature and we hold on to them, there is the chance we can still get Melo and still have enough assets to pull another player of his caliber down the line…
If we use those assets to grab him now and it doesn’t pan out for any number of reasons…injury, chemistry, trouble with the system, whateva OR if he plays great but we still aren’t good enough for the playoffs, then we are screwed because we gave up all our assets for this one player and we now have nothing left to work with.
Can’t trade for anyone else because we gave away our best young guns for Anthony.
Can’t draft any fresh rookie talent because we traded it away for Anthony.
Can’t bring in another star because a huge chunk of cap is taken up by the max contract of…Anthony…we could offer a mid level but really the only star’s that play for that, are the unproven quantities you referred to earlier and the ones past their prime. We should be very familiar with how the ME has worked out for us in the past.
What did the 5 fingers say to the face?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7CBwX1891A
HaHaHaHa!
by Lord Smackington on Aug 27, 2010 9:58 PM EDT up reply actions
1/10th of what Durant is...
really?? Do you honestly put Durant on that high of a pedestal?
I hear a lot of people really suck on Chris Paul’s nuts too in calling him the best PG of the decade… man, I may get called out for overvaluing Gallo and such, but jesus, THAT is some over-valuing bullshit too.
"you're the Rod Thorn in my Chris Bosh side."
by Chris Child's Fist on Aug 28, 2010 9:14 AM EDT up reply actions
yes i do
put durant on that high of a pedestal…being that the guy is 21 friggen years old and is in argument for the best player in the league
what are you guys all smoking I really, really want some
by James Angelo on Aug 28, 2010 12:21 PM EDT up reply actions
can't argue with that Durant is sick
but Amare is on the team I like to say at the very least he has 1/10’s Durant’s talent, but aside from that u may be right on that fact
What did the 5 fingers say to the face?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7CBwX1891A
HaHaHaHa!
by Lord Smackington on Aug 28, 2010 2:47 PM EDT up reply actions
smh if we gave him a 3 year extension
it will kick in at the end of his current deal which would make him 30…jus sayin
In Donnie We Trust!
True true true true true
Not to say that Melo is another Joe Johnson, but just that the Hawks reached a certain level and they’re locked into their players and I don’t think they’re getting any farther.
Thats a convenient strawman
Neither of the Knicks two options here resemble the Hawks’ or Thunder’s situations in any shape or form.
I’d rather our team be like last year’s Lakers rather than last year’s Nets. But that doesnt mean a goddamn thing so I don’t say it.
"But when he saw it, he just put his hands up and they couldn’t give it to him. It just fell to the ground, I-I don’t, you know … So, that showed me he had great experience..." - Jeff Van Gundy
by Anthony Bonner's Subpoena on Aug 27, 2010 6:09 PM EDT up reply actions
Salary comments
I keep hearing you guys make salary comments, referring to melo and his pricey contract. You realize we just gave a 100 million dollar contract to a guy who isn’t a franchise player (amare), but we don’t want to give a melo, who is definitely a franchise player, money that would put us near over the cap. Melo is worth twice what amare is, and should be paid rightfully so. I love amare and i love the signing and we needed to offer him a max so we can be in this exact situation, discussing what star we want next…but he is not a max player or a franchise player. You can’t make a franchise player out of a power forward, no matter how damn good he is. See KG and timberwolves. You need a guy who can score, and score like a maniac, and melo is that. The guy would probably average 35 ppg in dantonis system. But we need to keep gallo you’re right.
uh
Melo is worth twice what amare is, and should be paid rightfully so.
You have got to be kidding me. Amar’e is the most effecient high-volume scoring big man in the NBA. Carmelo is not the most anything, except maybe the most slobbered-over by covetous Knicks fans.
You can’t make a franchise player out of a power forward, no matter how damn good he is.
Tim Duncan, anyone? I should point out that the Spurs have stacked up titles NOT by saying “OMG we have an awesome PF now time to trade away all our other players and future draft picks and throw all our money at the best wing we can get right now now now.” Rather they have kept their picks, drafted smart, and developed young, cheap talent. Crazy at it sounds, that can work too.
Lets not forget Kevin Garnett, Karl Malone, Moses Malone, Charles Barkley, amongst others...
All PFs Just sayin.
"you're the Rod Thorn in my Chris Bosh side."
by Chris Child's Fist on Aug 28, 2010 9:58 AM EDT up reply actions
Moses Malone!
Very true. I left those other guys out because they weren’t the best players on championship teams (KG is sort of a different story). But yeah, clearly you can build a very good team around an elite PF.
It’s true that an elite PF isn’t always enough, but then again neither is an elite swingman. The NBA is littered with excellent SFs who couldn’t be the man and win a ring, either.
you guys are right
you just named 4 of the best pf’s in history and they have a combined 2 rings
great argument guys
KG only got his because he was on a dream team
So moses malone is the only guy who led his team to a ring
And Tim Duncan had Parker at his peak and Robinson still around….something we’re not close to. Tim Duncan is so much better than Amare is it’s not even an argument, so to compare that team to what we’re trying to build is ridiculous.
by James Angelo on Aug 28, 2010 12:31 PM EDT up reply actions
you said you can't make a franchise player out of a PF
they named franchise players who were PF’s.
And I dunno where’ you’re ratings come from, but that’s you. Amare may not have the jewelry that Duncan does nor is he the defensive presence, but in no way its he “so much better then Amare” that its not an argument.
by FreeBradshaw on Aug 28, 2010 12:38 PM EDT up reply actions
maybe
because tim duncan is hands down the best PF in history, and Amare is not even the best PF in the game right now, let alone history
i bet 90% of you guys wish we still had david lee too…
by James Angelo on Aug 28, 2010 12:40 PM EDT up reply actions
he's the best cuz he won rings
and was on great teams. If Garnett was a Spur he probably wins all those too.
You should not bet on things.
by FreeBradshaw on Aug 28, 2010 12:41 PM EDT up reply actions
thank you
for proving my point. Unless you have all stars around your all star PF, then it doesn’t matter.
We don’t have all stars around Amare right now….we have role players and young guys with potential. Potential to be all stars or absolute jack shit.
Give me felton buike melo amare turiaf with chandler as 6th man over felton buike gallo randolph amare any day of the friggen week. That first team can win 60 games and offensively give every team trouble in the playoffs. The second one wins 45 and prays their young guys develop into all stars while getting stomped out in the first round.
No one playing out of positing
by James Angelo on Aug 28, 2010 12:58 PM EDT up reply actions
***
no one playing out of position if melo is here without gallo too ****
by James Angelo on Aug 28, 2010 12:59 PM EDT up reply actions
I agree with that
Keeping Gallo would clog up the position and muddy things. On a personal level, I would rather keep Gallo but I’m not stupid enough to not love a straight up trade Melo for Gallo.
I’m only willing to give up so much though. I’m not gonna cripple the team so that if someone goes down after a Carmelo trade were left trying to scramble to put a number of D League rejects on the floor.
What did the 5 fingers say to the face?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7CBwX1891A
HaHaHaHa!
by Lord Smackington on Aug 28, 2010 3:28 PM EDT up reply actions
doubt that team wins 60
and doubt that all they give up is Gallo and Curry..or else Melo would be a Knick by now.
Its gonna take a lot more, and the Knicks will be now much better then they potentially could be this year with the only difference being a know quantity in Melo.
And I dunno why you’re even worried about players “out of position”. The Suns won a ton of games with Boris fuckin Diaw at PF and C. Starting…at PF or C. Boris Diaw.
You’re looking at Curry, Gallo, TD and Chandler. That’s a significantly altered squad with the cap space debilitating..and a cluster fuck for the 2010-11 season.
So….they make a big trade, for basically naught.
by FreeBradshaw on Aug 28, 2010 1:07 PM EDT up reply actions
You think
a team with Gallo and AR will be better than a team without them and with melo.
And I think you’re high.
by James Angelo on Aug 28, 2010 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions
Out of position
the only reason I bring that up is because just about everyone here keeps bringing up the defensive problems of carmelo. The defensive problems that would arise having him and Gallo on the floor at the same time would be ridiculous. I could give a shit less about people being out of position but everyone here cares about defense so bad so it’s worth mentioning.
by James Angelo on Aug 28, 2010 1:53 PM EDT up reply actions
actually the numbers say they'd be the same
but keeping Gallo and AR would be cheaper and you’d have more depth.
What did the 5 fingers say to the face?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7CBwX1891A
HaHaHaHa!
by Lord Smackington on Aug 28, 2010 3:30 PM EDT up reply actions
Tim Duncan > Amar'e all time, obviously
But I’m talking about right now. Or did I watch the bizarro playoffs where the Suns didn’t cold sweep the Spurs and it wasn’t Amar’e dropping 40 pts on Gasol in the Conference Finals?
When we are capable
of drafting any player to the caliber of parker or Ginobili with a pick that late give me a call, last time I checked we weren’t even smart enough to draft fucking brandon jennings when 3/4 of the NBA thought we should…david lee is the only prideful draft pick for this team in the last 10 years. Ariza we shipped away so why even count it. We have incompetent management to the level of the Wilpons. We could have drafted rondo and jennings and we missed both…so its not like we have an awesome front office capable of making franchise changing moves with late draft picks.
A) have swapped picks next year B) have no pick the year after that
We cannot build a championship team through the draft and the guys we have now
We literally might have the worst drafting situation in the entire NBA right now…I can’t think of one worse
by James Angelo on Aug 28, 2010 12:38 PM EDT up reply actions
Well, this much is true
We literally might have the worst drafting situation in the entire NBA right now…I can’t think of one worse
Well that much is true. Which is why we DO NOT give up all of our young cheap lottery picks!
hilarious
so when I point out the fact that its retarded to even think of building this team through the draft, you turn it around and say “exactly, that’s why we shouldn’t trade our young guys.”
that doesn’t change the fact that we won’t be acquiring another superstar without a draft pick…so if gallo or randolph doesn’t become an allstar we’re screwed
by James Angelo on Aug 29, 2010 7:18 PM EDT up reply actions
not screwed*
but definitely not making serious strides
by James Angelo on Aug 29, 2010 7:18 PM EDT up reply actions
Because, we already have 2 recent lottery picks on our roster
but no more for the foreseeable future. So, we need to hold on to the young talent we do have.
If Randolph had stayed 2 more years in school he’d have been drafted 2nd this summer behind Wall, for sure. The only reason he went 14th is that he weighed 175 lbs on draft night. 50 lbs of muscle later, and here we are. Do not let this kid go.
I SWEAR
its like we’re running in circles
In Donnie We Trust!
by IB on Aug 29, 2010 8:26 PM EDT up reply actions
that's why we need to stop smoking this stars weed and let donnie do his thing
so far he cleared us up from the mud and he got us the best available talent he can get and did a good job for allocating barron money for a point guard and getting character guys as well so please let it go and look at what we have now even with melo we are just a 7th seed so what’s the difference? might as well hold on what we have and play. we ain’t playing a card game here so just hold off that weed now and look at things a bit clearer being patient for 10 years hell i can wait a bit longer for a chip let things cool and let’s see it from there
oooooooo
good points flossy. thats sumthin i touched on over at theknicksblog.com and its sumthin i keep tryin to explain to ppl over here. U DONT NEED TO GIVE UP EVERYTHING TO WIN. THINGS HAPPEN WE’RE ALL HUMAN. NO 1 MAN IS SUPERMAN SAVE A TEAM.
In Donnie We Trust!
Hey, $40 Mil for Carmelo Anthony? Actually, yeah sounds like a bargain!!!!
Hey so, ok, lets get both of them. Since Melo’s max is $22M, that $42M for 2 players…. this years salary cap is near 60M… so lets use that number… shit lets bump it to $65 next year. So we have our 2 big guns for $42, leaving us $23Mil for the other 13 players needed to fill a roster. Wait, ok, Add in Felton at his $8Mil and Timofeys $3M and we at least have 4 locked up for sure. The rest we can literally renounce or let expire. Just for arguments sake, that leaves us $12Mil to use on 11 more players.
The NBA salary cap isn’t MLBs so you can only go over it through exceptions, not signing FAs.
C’mon man, does it honestly look like we can put together a championship team with so little money leftover?
Yeah, $20Mil is a lot for ONE player (Amar’e). But TWO over $20?? Dude, even Miami’s big 3 are signed collectively for $47Mil. Thats only $5Mil MORE than us with Melo/Amar’e…. and they have THREE guys.
"you're the Rod Thorn in my Chris Bosh side."
by Chris Child's Fist on Aug 28, 2010 9:57 AM EDT up reply actions
3 guys that are much more well-rounded
"Game Knows Game"
by Ray Smuckles on Aug 28, 2010 9:31 PM EDT up reply actions
This argument....
will never be settled because there are 3 camps involved.
1) Those who feel trading Gallo, AR, or both is too risky, even for Melo.
2) Those who feel we should trade anyone Denver asks for to acquire Melo.
3) Those who have valid arguments for taking either stance.
The problem here is no one in Camp 1 or 2 is paying attention to Camp 3. Camp 3 has the best grasp on the situation because they are the only ones looking at ALL sides of the equation. Camp 1 is basically like “let them play, our youngins will be great soon, cap flexibility, think about defense, etc.” Camp 2 is saying “they will never be Melo, Melo is the final piece, he could average 30+ next to Amare, they will attract others, etc.” Camp 3 is the only camp looking at both sides of this thing.
The truth is it makes sense to trade for him, and it makes sense to stand pat and hope for the best. Both methods have pros and cons. Both have a chance to backfire. Both have a chance to be absolutely the right decision. But NONE of us know. So for everyone in camp 1 or 2, stop acting like you know the future and chill out.
by JerzeeBalla on Aug 28, 2010 12:36 AM EDT reply actions 2 recs
I agree but
I think I’m in category 4) Relying on Gallo and/or AR becoming an all star player instead of trading for a arguably top 5 player in the NBA is risky
by James Angelo on Aug 28, 2010 12:41 PM EDT up reply actions
I don't know that Gallo or AR will ever be all stars
but I know they have proven they can be role players and/or even sparks off the bench
Does Melo care what Denver wants or gets? What Melo probably wants is to go where he and his family will be happy and to get his max contract.
If Melo really wants to be here he’ll decline to sign the extension no matter what deal comes across the table until he finds a team and situation he wants to be in.
Melo has been quoted as saying he is in no rush to sign, that’s because he is still under contract to the nuggets this year and will get paid this season regardless. His contract is not up until the end of the season when free agency hits, which at that point he’ll go wherever he wants to anyway.
Until then the pressure is on the nuggets to either convince him to stay or present a team he’ll be happy to go to. Carmelo has the leverage and can go where he chooses unless the nuggets decide to play chicken and ride it out to free agency and get nothing(which is a valid possibility unless someone here works in the Denver front office and knows there plans).
With all the pressure on the nuggets why offer two players that could be apart of our success when we don’t need to at this point? Let another team offer whatever they want, If Carmelo wants to be in NY he’ll continue to refuse signing the extension and there will be no deal.
He has to sign the nuggets offer at some point for a sign and trade to go down. The only way we lose him is if he decides he really doesn’t wanna be here, in which case nothing we offer including Gallo or AR can help. So why offer them plus draft picks and whatever else and we don’t have to?
What did the 5 fingers say to the face?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7CBwX1891A
HaHaHaHa!
by Lord Smackington on Aug 28, 2010 4:20 PM EDT up reply actions
If I were Melo
I’m not sure I’d even want to be traded before the season starts. It’s not like Denver sucks, and won’t he want to see how his other preferred destinations are looking? Won’t he want to see how Yao Ming looks, or keep his eye on whether the Knicks come out strong or implode?
This.
For all this talk, Melo doesnt have to rush. He holds the cards. If I am him, I let the season start, watch all the teams I am interested in closely, then settle on one and force the trade to that team. If he does that, it makes it easier for whoever that team is to make that trade, because Denver either has to take whats offered or lose Melo for nothing a few months later.
But I’m not him, so…..who knows? Maybe he just doesnt want to play there this year at all. Maybe he will play the year out. Maybe he will play a couple months and try to force the trade near the deadline. Who knows?
by JerzeeBalla on Aug 28, 2010 11:23 PM EDT up reply actions
yup
right at the deadline im tellin denver management time to call the knicks lmfao na seriously tho dats y i didnt understand the arguements. ppl might look at my comments and say im pro gallo and i am in certain aspects but im a knicks fan first. i jus think waiting is better and i believe that melo as well as the knicks are in the driving seat bekuz denver is the one losing a piece since he’s in his contract year and can walk for nothing
In Donnie We Trust!
You are proving me right.....
Of course its risky. But trading all your young talent for a superstar and leaving your team thin on the bench is risky too. Boston lost to LA because their bench was thin in the frontcourt. Perkins injury forced SHELDEN WILLIAMS to play meaningful minutes in a Finals Game 6.
Upgrading talent is always good to do, but at what cost? If you trade for Melo, we really have no way to make anymore moves. So whatever we end up with after that trade is what we got for the next few years. When you factor in our lack of first rounders, its a HUGE risk to trade for Melo. Just like Miami has taken a HUGE risk as well. Will we think it was genius to sign those 3 if they dont get any rings? Fuck no. There are no guarantees in life.
So again, both scenarios are risky, and both make sense. And you are in Camp 2, you just worded it different.
I'm throwing ur campaign party
What did the 5 fingers say to the face?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7CBwX1891A
HaHaHaHa!
by Lord Smackington on Aug 28, 2010 10:33 PM EDT up reply actions
Cool.....
As long as strippers are present. And booze. And Sunny Delight, I like Sunny Delight.
by JerzeeBalla on Aug 28, 2010 11:20 PM EDT up reply actions
so
whose in camp 3…personally i think i see both points i jus rather trade ar den gallo bkuz at least ive seen gallo start
In Donnie We Trust!
Myself for one....
I can easily see both sides of the coin here. Which is why either way Im fine. If we trade for Melo, I understand why we did and I will embrace the trade. If we dont, Ill understand why we did and embrace the current roster.
But if we stand strong and somehow have fate smile upon us…..And get Melo as a free agent? I will officially kiss Walsh’s pinky ring, cause that’s a poker play most wouldnt make.
that would be the most sensible thing to do
IMO, what you just said right there makes the most sense. Maybe I’m wrong but honestly I find no flaw in that logic.
What did the 5 fingers say to the face?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7CBwX1891A
HaHaHaHa!
by Lord Smackington on Aug 29, 2010 4:09 PM EDT up reply actions
Yo Angelo
I get what ur saying, I really do. You don’t want to miss out on possibly one of the most electrifying and talented stars of this generation. I understand. You feel if Melo is gets interested in other teams and they throw a good pckg together then we’ll have missed out.
I want us to win and I want us to win now as I’m sure you do, but our opinions on how to do that differ wildly.
You feel because Melo may be interested in going somewhere besides NY we should immediately offer Gallo and AR before it’s too late and I feel while we aren’t yet contenders we are vastly improved and there is no need to panic and ruin anything we have just built because if Melo wants to play for the Knicks then the nuggets will make it happen or end up empty handed.
I called you Miss Cleo previously because I’m sarcastic, I think I’m funny and I was kinda pissed you would call people making rational points homers for stating their opinions. I apologize. You should know I actually enjoyed this post tho and I encourage you to keep sharing your opinions no matter how stupid they are…joking…sorta…no 4real, I always luv a good debate.
What did the 5 fingers say to the face?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7CBwX1891A
HaHaHaHa!
by Lord Smackington on Aug 29, 2010 12:26 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
good thread
I think this was a bigger thread than any of the lebron ones, which is good because this actually matters and it’s debating over a trade that would determine the direction of this franchise for the next decade
I’m ready to put this one to bed if you guys are, we have about 10 different schools of thought here on the possibility of a trade….and theres no right or wrong point of view…just opinions
This is healthy.
I love that we as a fan base arent all just blindly following the same school of thought. We all love our Knicks, we just have different ideas on how we want them to look. But as long as I dont see anyone proposing ideas that make us worse, I have no problem with some lively debates and such. One thing we all agree on is that Walsh has the ship moving in the right direction. The only unknown is how long it will take to reach our destination. Could happen this year, next, the one after that, maybe never (shudders.) But we are headed that way as of this post. When was the last time we could say that and really mean it?
I hope
I hope everyone starts getting into the knicks again, I for one enjoy when a bandwagon gets going. There’s nothing quite like having one team that everyone in ny can root for together like the knicks…we don’t have that in any other sport. I was young during the 90’s so I hope we’re going to enter a good time for the knicks here. A decade straight of playoff appearances with deep runs and maybe a few rings would be nice :)
yea
that’d be nicer than a toothless prostitute going down on a diseased hobo while I watch anxiously from the bushes!
Good times!!!
What did the 5 fingers say to the face?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7CBwX1891A
HaHaHaHa!
by Lord Smackington on Aug 30, 2010 10:10 AM EDT up reply actions

by 






