(Another) New Knicks Curl Play
Mike D'Antoni likes to cook soup, probably. The second he had a fresh batch of ingredients, he started jackpotting around with some new recipes. I already touched on one of the recipes he unveiled against the Magic, but he's been serving up a heartier, more tasty one over the last few games. I think he calls the play Ossobuco. Like the former, its focus is to get Amare Stoudemire the ball off a curl because through motion is one of the best ways to feed him. So, think of a mobile Amar'e as the base of the offense - the mise en place, if you will.
It begins with the ball on the left wing. Amar'e (or in this case, Shawne Williams) sets a screen for Carmelo Anthony who cuts across the lane and into the left post. As Melo cuts across, the point guard and center set staggering screens for Amar'e.

If the defense behaves, Amar'e is free for his soaking wet midrange jumper off the curl.

Now, Shawne WIlliams' midrange jumper is pretty arid but the play is ran to perfection.
Here's another example with Amar'e's jumper.
Of course, the play isn't always this crisp against teams more enthused than the Utah Jazz this particular evening, so let's have a look at a few variations that come from this set.
Another option is a simple, reset pick-and-roll with the point guard instead of the catch-and-shoot. On the first clip, I think Extra E passes on a good shoot. He has plenty of room to get it off with Dirk Nowitzki recovering from the stagger screen but he opts to reset with Toney Douglas. When Jared Jeffries clears the right side, the play results in a side pick-and-roll where Extra E still gets off a good shot but comes up empty. Jeff Van Gundy always says that the first open shot a team gets is often times the best shot which was probably the case here.

On the second clip, Chauncey Billups doesn't clear out the same way Jeffries does and Amar'e sets a simple screen to free up Douglas.

Douglas' defender goes under the screen and gives him an open shot.
The other variation is the almost forgotten decoy of the set. The first screen set by Amar'e is designed to get someone open in the post. On the first clip, Melo gets the step on his defender and Marc Gasol doesn't switch, leaving him free to receive the pass under the basket. The play ends with a smooth pass to Amar'e for an easy bucket.

Jason Kidd defends the play differently by going over the screen, hoping to cut Landry Fields off on his cut. The problem is he has his back turned to the entry passer, Melo, who hits him with a bullet.

Fields draws the foul on the first play of the game.
D'Antoni's soup highlights everyone's strengths. Amar'e's been dead-eye from midrange of late shooting 50% and 53% from 10-15 feet and 16-23 feet respectively over his last ten games. This play gets him in those spots for catch-and-shoot jumpers. It also has the potential of getting Melo deep post position where he feels most comfortable. And of course, if everything breaks down, a simple pick-and-roll may be all that's needed to bail the team out.
34 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
ha,ha
its dirty job but somebody gotta do it he,he
man we should do something about our pnr coverage, this can become chronic.
I really dont understand why nba coaches are using so much switching , cause eventually it gets exposed, especially agaisnt good offensive teams. Todaj i had conversation with my friend, who is a coach, and we couldnt explaint it, aside from usual suspects, its easier to implement, hides bad defenders etc.
ding ding ding! Pay the man Shirley
Yes switching hides bad defenders which the Knicks have a few of!
by Robert Curre on Mar 15, 2011 4:21 PM EDT up reply actions
SSSSHHHHH Gian quiet before you confuse someone into thinking
That D’Antoni is actually coaching and not just picking his toe Jam during practices as some would lead us to believe.
i say we be the first team to fire a coach in mid season
of a team that is going to make the playoffs and replace him with a blogger from P&T…… im all for it cuz dantonio s physically running this team in the ground……… gian you got my vote for coach
by SLAUGHTERHOUSE on Mar 15, 2011 11:25 AM EDT reply actions
How is he running a team into the ground that is making the playoffs?
by Robert Curre on Mar 15, 2011 11:31 AM EDT up reply actions
i like how on a post
highlighting the job Mike D is doing on offense, there is a call to fire him and replace him with the person who is simply pointing out what Mike D is doing.
NY, I love you… but your bringing me down…
I think it was Bobby V who said: "You are never as good as you are when you are at your best, and you are not as bad as when you are at your worst."
people so crazy
Most Definitely
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hfGTVp-gHtU
by Ray Smuckles on Mar 15, 2011 12:06 PM EDT up reply actions
exactly what i was thinking
"they try to do what he do, and been where he's been, but they get folded in two.....he's the dude"
I'd vote gian for an assisstent coach spot
but I think you’re insane trying to fire Pringles. Did anyone in their right mind expect us to gut our roster, at least the starting lineup, and then come out firing on all cylinders? No fuckin way that happens, at least consistently.
We’ve show how bad we can be and how good we can be, on both ends of the floor. Sorry it doesn’t happen at the snap of a finger, but that’s really too bad. And this is coming from someone that despises the trade we made.
Last night, a comedian died in New York. Somebody knows why. Somebody knows
by Rorschach44 on Mar 15, 2011 12:42 PM EDT up reply actions
u dont like the trade? or you think we gave too much.
i would have liked to keep chandler out of the group. Him or Mozzle.
"they try to do what he do, and been where he's been, but they get folded in two.....he's the dude"
I don't like the trade cuz we gave up too much
If we had one Gallo or Chan I doubt we have so many chemistry issues.
Last night, a comedian died in New York. Somebody knows why. Somebody knows
Yes the trade package should have included either Chandler or Gallo but not both
but what is done is done, so what are you gonna do. They have 17 games left to figure some things out and personally I think Mike is doing a decent job piloting this group. How often does a coach whose team is solidly in playoff contention have is roster gutted and has to start from scratch. Be patient everyone it will come.
by Robert Curre on Mar 15, 2011 4:25 PM EDT up reply actions
not so much despise
as fucking hate
Last night, a comedian died in New York. Somebody knows why. Somebody knows
We didn't gut our roster. we replaced gallo with melo(who plays more minutes) and billups with felton. Wilson's minutes get dispersed to underused subs and Mozgov's to Turiaf and Jeffries. Can we find someone to replace Wilson and Mozgov?
Well the whole point of the trade was that the answer to that question is yes, because its easier to find a wilson and mozgov than a melo by far. And mozgov, lets not forget, is a 24 year old undrafted rookie who was averaging 4pts and 3rpg. He still gets no burn in denver. He would have defintely been more useful here and he was slowly improving but please, we didnt give up a Tyson Chandler. In fact, hopefully we get him this summer.
P.S curry and a. randolph didnt play.
that's why I didn't say 'Gut roster"
I said gutted the starting lineup, which we did. 3/5 players is gutting…sorry.
Last night, a comedian died in New York. Somebody knows why. Somebody knows
Doesn't count.
Turiaf, Jeffries, Mozgov, take one and pick.
I don’t care about a technicality. The Cs we have on this roster are irrelevant.
Last night, a comedian died in New York. Somebody knows why. Somebody knows
and who the hell cares about replacing players?
its not about replacing players. Its about adding players.
Last night, a comedian died in New York. Somebody knows why. Somebody knows
Bababooey my friend you misunderstand the point.
By gut the roster it means you traded four guys who were in the rotation and brought in a bunch of other players. When you lose that many guys who were playing significant minutes and have to replace them in the middle of the season there are Chemistry issues and those lead to losses of probably winnable games. It is not the fact that we cannot replace any of the players we gave up in the trade, but that as far as the rest of this season all you can really say is that replaced Gallo and Felton. The other players have not been replaced. As for how easy it is to replace Wilson Chandler, given that he is developing into a pretty good player on both sides of the ball, that will not be easy especially when 80% of your salary cap space is tied up in 2 players and you don’t have the money to go get him and it took years to develop him through the draft. I am sure it will be done just not as easy as you might think. Remember Shawne Williams and Bill Walker were supposed to be just as good, well on a game to game basis it is not even close. They are as far away in talent from Chandler as Gallo is from Melo especially when it comes to producing on the court. As for Mozgov, he was finally catching on and starting to give us productive minutes on the floor. He was beginning to have the looks of developing into a serviceable Center. And as you know those are actually few and far between in this league now. Will we replace him with a player as good or possibily better? In time i would say yes, but as for right now, not hardly. And as for Tyson Chandler how you planning on getting him without cap money or assets to trade for him? Chandler is:
A) Gonna get overpaid by Mark Cuban so forget it or
B) Get overpaid by someone else as possibly the best Center on the Free Agent Market. Afterall guys who can guard Dwight Howard straight up without Help and hold him under 20 pts and 10 rebounds as Chandler has done are gonna get paid. Now if you think that the fact that he can put the same jersey on as Amar’e and Melo will convince him to sign for league minimum then I hope you are right.
by Robert Curre on Mar 15, 2011 4:42 PM EDT up reply actions
this is not what I said
but it is what you said.
Aaaand Duck.
Last night, a comedian died in New York. Somebody knows why. Somebody knows
first of all, great analysis
second of all, 53% from 16 to 23 feet from your PF is obnoxious.

by 























