Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Why Hockey Fans Should Root For Devils Vs. Kings

Defense at the 4: Amare vs. Jeffries?

Imo, the best solution is to tailor the lineup to each situation. If there's a major scorer at the opponent's 4 who must be stopped (Pau, Love, Bosh, et al), and Amare can't do it, use JJ over Amare.... if you've got the balls for that, which you should if you're gonna be head coach.

Defensive Efficiency:*
Jeffries: 94.6
Amare: 100.8
Fields: 96.0
Anthony: 99.0
Novak: 98.3

* Points allowed per 100 possessions. (An imperfect advanced stat, but it's what we have for measuring individual defense.)
( Source: http://www.nba.com/advancedstats/player.html#Carmelo-Anthony|2546;year=201112;season=r )

Jeffries is SUBSTANTIALLY better than Amare on D.
Anthony vs. Novak or Fields is not as clear... Fields has been the better defender, but Melo is a MUCH better rebounder (obviously). And we can always hope that Melo will improve his D now.... can't we?

Of course, who knows how all these dynamics will change in this reborn Knicks team? Anything can happen now. Guess we have to wait and see.

Comment 49 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Jeffries compiled most of those numbers against lesser competition.

He’s not all that good of a one-on-one defender, especially when facing quality bigs. And even though he might be better than Stat on the defensive end, he offers near nothing on offense (in which case he’s allowing the opposing big to conserve a ton of energy).

by Crackback on Feb 13, 2012 7:24 AM EST reply actions  

Probably should use past tense there

Jeffries USED TO offer near nothing on offense. It’s all changing now. Everything, really.

by JR99 on Feb 13, 2012 10:19 PM EST up reply actions  

No offense, but

it’s pretty obviously you’ve been following the Knicks for like, two weeks.

by flossy on Feb 13, 2012 11:02 PM EST up reply actions  

True that

…but does that change the numbers?

by JR99 on Feb 14, 2012 12:13 AM EST up reply actions  

Like +/-, this stat does not take into account that JJ gets most of his minutes against back-ups

He is a very good help defender, hustle player, etc., but come on. With a PG who is halfway competent at running a pick and roll/pick and pop, Amar’e can get you 25 points on 15 shots without breaking a sweat, something Jeffries could never dream of. That kind of offensive beastliness more than makes up for his defensive issues.

by flossy on Feb 13, 2012 10:38 AM EST reply actions  

Number of points is not the important issue

The efficiency of scoring is, as well as the end result, the points differential. See the “Well, let’s look at the numbers….” comment below.

by JR99 on Feb 13, 2012 10:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Do you understand how efficient 25 points on 15 shots is?

And how utterly incapable Jared Jeffries is of doing anything close?

by flossy on Feb 13, 2012 11:01 PM EST up reply actions  

The key #s......

Amare’s Defensive Efficiency (opponent points per 100 possessions) is 100.8, while Jeffries’ is 94.6. So in a typical game, opponents will score about 6 POINTS more on Amare than Jeffries. This may change now, but we don’t know that, yet.

6 points is huge.

And if Amare doesn’t score, as we have seen, SOMEBODY ELSE WILL. Shots still go up, just not by Amare. To compensate for his weaker defense, Amare would need to have a TS% about 15%-20% BETTER than the guys who are taking the shots he normally takes. If that’s Jeffries, for example, it’s not even close… in fact, Amare’s FG% is only 1% better, and more importantly….

- Amare’s TS% is 51.3%,
- Jeffries’ TS% over the past 4 games is 56.3%.

Based on these numbers, Jeffries production if more efficient than Amare’s. But of course, Amare’s should also improve in the new system… so we gotta wait and see.

by JR99 on Feb 14, 2012 12:38 AM EST up reply actions  

I don't know how familiar you are with Jeffries' offensive game, but if Amare was getting the shots Jared's been getting during these last 5 games, I would bet your dog's paws Amare would be posting a high TS% than 56%.

Is that Amare’s TS% for this season? A season that’s been so bad for him that people are actively whispering that he’s lost more than just a step? What is the lowest TS% in his career?

I’m not even gonna go on about what a minuscule sample 4 games is, but do you really think Jared will be able to switch roles with Amare in the rotation that much more effectively?

I dream of Eddy Curry feeding me fish sticks.

Look at it Dave. Look at it.

by GAx on Feb 14, 2012 1:27 AM EST up reply actions  

okay someone posting while I was typing somehow made me post that before I was finished, but while I agree Jared's defense(both man and team concept) are massively superior, Amare is the better option on both sides without a doubt.

Since his move to the 4, we’ve all realized that part of his effectiveness last year was due to the fact that C’s not named Chuck Hayes had no chance to defend against him, but Amare didn’t exactly have the defensive advantage on the other side. His opponents’ eFG% allowed, as well as the raw net points recorded while he’s on and off the court, has been predictably shitty this year, but with the addition of a bona fide PG, I think his offensive contributions will more than make up for what a great matador he is.

Lin would have had 5 straight double doubles by now if Amare had been the one converting and giving Lin assists instead of Jared going up with the ball like he has oven mitts on.

I dream of Eddy Curry feeding me fish sticks.

Look at it Dave. Look at it.

by GAx on Feb 14, 2012 1:35 AM EST up reply actions  

We don't disagree

I’m pretty sure Amare’s offensive #s will jump in the new system, as you say.

And like you, I think Amare’s defense is the real worry going forward. He’s gotta buy into the extra effort on D that the whole team has shown lately. If not, his offense will not (cannot) compensate. (Even if Amare’s offense improves to 56% or 58% TS%, it won’t compensate for the points given up on the defensive end.)

by JR99 on Feb 14, 2012 1:51 AM EST up reply actions  

I don't know if he can though

he is stupid at defense

Anxiously awaiting the day my username will be appropriate

by knickswin on Feb 14, 2012 3:39 AM EST up reply actions  

Fields is rebounding from the guard position, so you’re comparing apples vs oranges.
Begin the comparisons when Lin starts distributing the ball. Hopefully, Melo and Amare won’t be getting so many touches.

by frankiec on Feb 13, 2012 11:06 AM EST reply actions  

True about Fields

But I think you have to agree that Melo is way the better rebounder anyway, even if we don’t have apples-to-apples data to prove it.

by JR99 on Feb 13, 2012 10:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Seriously guys. I can't wait for Lin to finally start distributing the ball. And freezing out Amare and Melo for some reason.

I wish he could just pass it to David Lee.

I dream of Eddy Curry feeding me fish sticks.

Look at it Dave. Look at it.

by GAx on Feb 14, 2012 1:36 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

NY Post reporting Lin may sign elsewhere next season as Knicks don’t have room in their cap for Lin?

Incredible if Dolan spends all that $ on Melo and Amare, but it is all irrelevant.

Melo and Amare probably won’t be back next season.

by frankiec on Feb 13, 2012 11:08 AM EST reply actions  

Have to go with Amare

JJ holds back the offense as much or more than he helps the defense.

by Mr. 2 on Feb 13, 2012 11:28 AM EST reply actions  

Well

I’m dang sure Amare wouldn’t take charges like JJ does…

My Wife is a Patriot's fan...
"Giants rely on fumbles and stripping the ball. If the pats secure the ball, then the pats win, but if they fumble or let the ball get striped than the giants win. every game the giants play they always benefit from the other teams bonehead mistakes (fumbled or striped) not from thier skills. The giants are a dirty team, I can’t think of any othe team as dirty as the giants. They try to strip the ball as hard as they can because they know they can’t win a fair game." by EaglesNeedD on Jan 23, 2012 2:01 AM EST

by Giantssincesix on Feb 13, 2012 11:43 AM EST reply actions  

You never start JJ over STAT

NEVER

2012 New York Mets, World Series Champions!

by astromets on Feb 13, 2012 2:11 PM EST reply actions  

Well, let's look at the numbers....

Stat’s FG% is 45%. In the 4 games that Jerffries has played in Stat’s absence, his FG% was 44% (11/25). Not much difference there. Don’t forget, when Stat’s not there, SOMEBODY is still going to take the shots he would normally take; it’s not like that production is lost…. the question becomes one of efficiency. Will the team score as EFFICIENTLY in Stat’s absence? The answer with regard to Jeffries seems to be yes. And the answer we’ve seen in games seems to be yes too.

But on defense, it appears from the numbers that Jeffries is MUCH better than Stat. (By about 6 points per game. Which is A LOT!) It doesn’t matter in the end where the point differential comes from in any given game, right? The object is to score more than the other guys, so preventing the other team from scoring is no less valuable than scoring more yourself. MORE valuable, it could be argued, because good defense often leads to better offense, due to the extra buckets in transition.

Bottom line: Especially in games against high-scoring 4s, giving Jeffries extra playing time makes pretty good sense…. if the coach has the gonads for it.

by JR99 on Feb 13, 2012 10:11 PM EST up reply actions  

And the TS% number are even more interesting

…because there, Jeffries’ is actually better:

- Amare’s TS% is 51.3%,
- Jeffries’ TS% in past 4 games is 56.3%.

…though Amare’s could also improve in the new system.

by JR99 on Feb 14, 2012 12:59 AM EST up reply actions  

4 games is epic SSS - talking 25 shots here

let’s see what 4 games of STAT with Lin does. 4 games with less rusty STAT and Lin should be even better

2012 New York Mets, World Series Champions!

by astromets on Feb 15, 2012 2:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Such is the power of Lin!

Is this an actual discussion about starting Jared Jeffries over Amar’e Stoudemire? Is this actually happening?

Get The Frickin' Rebound

by fuhry on Feb 13, 2012 2:16 PM EST reply actions  

i worry about the impact of stoudemire's defense

sometimes amar’e’s a better option for one-on-one defense just because he doesn’t weight 112 pounds like jeffries does, but the difference in team defense is huge

Anxiously awaiting the day my username will be appropriate

by knickswin on Feb 13, 2012 11:10 PM EST reply actions  

Lost in all this hoopla about Knick fans reading between the lines of post-game interviews to find proof that Melo's teammates are trying to send him veiled messages about buying into the offense,

is the fact that Amare needs to buy in to the team’s defense.

Well okay it’s not lost at all, but there’s a certain humor in this whole situation to me. People are afraid of Melo being the problem child when he comes back while not worrying about Amare fitting into the offense at all, but on the other end I’m not that worried about Melo on defense while I’m terrified Amare’s dumbassery on defense will kill any and all momentum we ever have.

I dream of Eddy Curry feeding me fish sticks.

Look at it Dave. Look at it.

by GAx on Feb 14, 2012 1:43 AM EST up reply actions  

+1

Both Melo and especially Amare must perform on the defensive end too, like the whole team’s been doing lately.

by JR99 on Feb 14, 2012 1:53 AM EST up reply actions  

his pick and roll defense is a huge problem

which is why I wonder whether he’s a greater asset on the floor than jeffries . . .

Anxiously awaiting the day my username will be appropriate

by knickswin on Feb 14, 2012 3:38 AM EST up reply actions  

You're not worried about Melo on defense?

He’s honestly not much better than Amar’e overall, his mistakes are just less glaring

by flossy on Feb 14, 2012 8:04 AM EST up reply actions  

melo makes mistakes on team defense

but he’s not like amar’e. melo understands when to double and how to hedge pick and rolls. amar’e is so bad that teams will run pick and rolls and motion at him because they’ll know he’ll get confused.

Anxiously awaiting the day my username will be appropriate

by knickswin on Feb 14, 2012 4:10 PM EST up reply actions  

Melo

virtually never tries to over screens, is slow to close out on shooters and gets caught ball-watching constantly. But I agree, his mistakes are more about not trying or losing focus whereas Amar’e is more prone to simply not understanding.

by flossy on Feb 14, 2012 5:06 PM EST up reply actions  

amar'e ball watches like no other

Anxiously awaiting the day my username will be appropriate

by knickswin on Feb 14, 2012 9:33 PM EST up reply actions  

a) Nobody has suggested that

(though it’s arguable in certain circumstances.)

b) Do numbers give you a headache? Here, this might help…
http://www.midol.com/products.html

by JR99 on Feb 14, 2012 5:25 PM EST up reply actions  

Step away from basketball-reference.net

before you hurt yourself. You plainly don’t understand the statistics you cite.

by flossy on Feb 14, 2012 5:41 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm sorry...

but does that pass for an argument around here?

by JR99 on Feb 14, 2012 6:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Everyone knows it's only 4-5 games

That’s why it’s a discussion and not a certainty. Maybe this will help: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/discussion

by JR99 on Feb 15, 2012 5:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Advanced stats are overrated

That same site puts Shump’s DRating at 100.1 and he’s our best on ball defender. He shuts people down. He shut down Calderon tonight and Kobe in the Lakers game. He’s a stopper.

Not to mention Jared Jeffries’ D is overrated. He was completely abused by Kevin Love and by Jermaine O’Neal in playoffs last year. He is fantastic at drawing a charge, but he’s isn’t as good offensively as Amar’e and isn’t as good a rebounder. The real difference is that Jeffries is a good team defender, whereas Amar’e seems to do better in one on one situations.

Do the Shumpty Shump, come on and do the Shumpty Shump

by DangerZone on Feb 15, 2012 4:05 AM EST reply actions  

jeffries is a fine one-on-one defender if he's not giving up to much strength and size

he is good at guarding other beanpoles like garnett and bosh, but guys like love will take it to him. love took it to chandler too. al jefferson abused us as well. really the guy who should be guarding those types of players is josh harrellson.

Anxiously awaiting the day my username will be appropriate

by knickswin on Feb 15, 2012 6:12 AM EST up reply actions  

Think they're useful but only as part of the analyzing process.

Kinda view them as a useful tool to help judge players/performance. Don’t think it’s a good idea to just go advanced stats and just ignore everything else that can be eyeballed.

by srsrs on Feb 15, 2012 9:40 AM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Posting and Toasting: Blogging the Knicks Robin Hood-Style Since 2007

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Ed-in-chief_small
Updated Knick Pride 2.0: Bocker Bench goes bonkers
Ed-in-chief_small
Knick Pride
Jorts6_small
Next Season's Roster and the Cap and the Tax

Recent FanPosts

Small
The Draft Workouts - What does Math Show Us?
Small
Tyson Chandler NOT on NBA All-Defensive team???
Small
If you were Lin's Agent, would you Pick the Knicks?
Small
American in Taiwan Jeremy & Woodson
Clydeuglysuit_small
Proposed Amare TRAID!
Ed-in-chief_small
Knick Pride 5.0: Spread the love
Ed-in-chief_small
Updated Knicks Pride 4.0: The funny and derpy!
Ed-in-chief_small
Updated Knick Pride 3.0: Eye candy for the ladies (Men, enter at your own risk)

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >