Knickerblogger explains the Lin and Fields contract situations, bird options.
Oh, this is so very helpful. Knowing that we'd all get to asking, Brian Cronin of Knickerblogger took the time to explain the forthcoming contract options for Landry Fields and Jeremy Lin (the latter of whom will have his deal guaranteed for the rest of the season on Friday). Both Lin and Fields will be free agents this summer, but there are rules and exceptions in place that could help the Knicks reel either or both of them back to New York (whether and how badly they'll want to do that remains to be seen).
See, because Fields will have played two years with the Knicks, he'll be eligible for the "Early Bird Exception", which means the Knicks can offer him one ratite of his choosing (sources say Fields would favor a rhea). If Fields signs a one year deal, the Knicks will have full bird rights next season and be eligible to offer Landry any feathered creature he desires. Lin has no bird rights and is only entitled to things like the non-bird exception, wherein he could be offered either a badger, an eggplant, or a clock radio. I think I've got that right, but here's Brian:
As an Early Bird player, Fields can be offered a contract that starts at 175% of his current salary or anything up to the average NBA salary (which is roughly $5 million). They can pay Fields this money without affecting their mid-level exception. However, if Fields just signs a one year deal for anything up to the average salary, then the following season the Knicks will have his full Bird Rights and then can re-sign him to a salary larger than the average salary. It really depends on how well Fields plays the rest of the year to determine what kind of deal he signs.
Lin, however, is not an Early Bird player since he has only played one year for the Knicks. Therefore, if they want to re-sign him, they would have to use one of the following:
1. The Non-Bird Exception, where they could pay him up to 120% of his current salary (or roughly $1 million)
2. The Bi-Annual exception (which is something like $2 million) or
3. However much of the mid-level (which is roughly $5 million) they would need to re-sign him.
Essentially, that makes Fields pretty easy to re-sign and Lin somewhat trickier (though doable) should his fine play continue. Of course, if the Knicks find themselves even considering a dip into the mid-level to pay Lin, that'll mean things went pretty well. That's one of them good problems.
I highly recommend you read Cronin's full piece, where he fleshes out and explains each of the alternatives. This stuff isn't particularly relevant right now, but it's good to know, and we'll be happy we learned about it come summertime.
Everybody say thank you to Brian. Come on! Thaaaaaank you Briaaaaaaaaan. Good job.
22 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Excellent piece
Landry for $5 for one year seems to be about right, then he can be rewarded the season after.
And I agree Seth, if we even have to consider dipping into the MLE for Lin then it would be because he is doing a job for us, Nash for the MLE is a pipe dream to be honest, I’d be happy with Lin getting a small portion of it (providing he does a solid job for the rest of the season), and the rest going to Wil upon his triumphant return
hell if it only takes 5 dollars
i’ll give Landry quadruple that to stay for 2 years
by blackhova on Feb 8, 2012 9:35 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
wilson chandler?
i’m pretty sure denver will match anything anybody else would offer. isn’t he still technically a restricted free agent? does his contract count as seasons played with the nba or as the years go by? how does this work?
I believe he's a restricted FA right now...
… so once the season’s over, he’ll be as free as a bird.
by The Raging Platypus on Feb 8, 2012 12:14 PM EST up reply actions
What if Landry asks for a dodo with his bird rights?
I know it wasn’t a ratite, but still.
by urban analrapist on Feb 8, 2012 12:52 PM EST reply actions
Thaaannkkk yooouuu Briiiaannn!
The Knicks actually have quite a few options to get better this coming offseason. Re-signing Fields and Lin both seem like musts at this point, but players are always available with the veteran’s min., not to mention the biannual and full MLE.
Sounds good to me!
KNICKS NOW
http://nyknicksnow.blogspot.com/ - check it out!
Resigning both of them would be excellent
I don’t think enough people here preach it, but continuity is so important in building a championship team. Fields and Lin are replaceable, but it would be so much better to keep them on the team and letting them develop while forming a chemistry with the rest of the team.
New York Knicks = Sleeping Giants
Wanna check out an awesome blog? http://cospeniazmi.blogspot.com
by moose35 on Feb 8, 2012 1:30 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
Continuity is HUGE.
A lot of my fellow New York sports fans fail to recognize this even though we see evidence of it everywhere…
How many times did the Yankees win the World Series by relying on major free agent signings in key roles? Compare that number to how many they won when the free agents were just role players…
What about the last few Giant Super Bowls? Everybody bitched and moaned when they didn’t make any big free agent splashes this past offseason. I’d say the strategy worked fine.
Same can be said of the Rangers who are actually competing this year, for those of you who care about hockey…
It is VERY rare that championship teams come together over the course of a single season. With the Celtics a few years ago, they managed to do it because everybody came in and instantly bought into the culture. But that stuff usually takes time; it’d be nice if we, as fans, would allow it to happen.
by nocookiesforme on Feb 8, 2012 2:13 PM EST up reply actions
So we want him to play well, but not too well so we can sign him cheap?
Fuck it. Kick ass Lin!!!
2012 New York Mets, World Series Champions!
Makes me wonder what happens when...
We get Azubuike B-Diddy back. If he and Lin are playing at a comparable level, and that level is high, will there be enough of an incentive to keep Lin’s minutes, and therefore the value of his next contract, low? Would D’Antoni pull that kind of nonsense even if the incentive were there? Or would he put Lin’s development ahead of silly maneuvering like that?
by nocookiesforme on Feb 8, 2012 2:05 PM EST up reply actions
I think if Lin keeps playing
you keep playing him. Obviously Baron gets the nod to start, but it would be wise to keep them both rested. When has MDA ever had a chance to have 2 rested and good PGs on his roster?
2012 New York Mets, World Series Champions!
all I know is Landry better not have anyone else over his place
JLin needs to have that couch reserved for all the rest he’s gonna need
I think that TD needs some time on that couch
__________________________________________________
"He who gets the best players usually wins" - Bobby Bowden
Seth, I've been wondering this for a long time...
Are you a Biology Major / in Veterinary school? Or do you have a near-encyclopedic knowledge of the animal kingdom because that’s just how you roll?
Did you ever subscribe to ZooBooks when you were a kid?
Damn, those things were AWESOME.
by nocookiesforme on Feb 8, 2012 2:15 PM EST up reply actions
I see you as an urban cryptozoologist
__________________________________________________
"He who gets the best players usually wins" - Bobby Bowden
Here's my favorite part of that article
But here’s the unusual twist in Lin’s story: His success has little to do with smarts. He is, according to players, virtually unguardable.
__________________________________________________
"He who gets the best players usually wins" - Bobby Bowden

by 




















