Okay, so as of this writing we're still waiting on an OFFICIAL word for whether or not the Knicks will re-sign Lin. It's a silly political game of cat-and-mouse, "grown-ups" acting like children all around. . . so let's not get into that. As an aside, what if I told you that by not signing Lin, Dolan is losing not one, but two players?
OK, OK, so they're not quite losing Novak, and small sample sizes are small. But Novak will clearly miss Lin more than any other Knick. There's a tactical explanation: Lin often found Novak on his iso plays. When Lin attacked the paint and the defense collapsed on him, he'd kick out to Novak who'd fire an open 3. Kidd and Felton are competent point guards, but they aren't Lin. Felton's not the man who left NY and Kidd's 3-point shooting won't free up Novak on the perimeter. Without Lin, even with an experienced PG like Davis, Novak had trouble getting open. He got the ball less, he shot less, and missed more. While that doesn't make him incompetent (honestly, 45.4% from downtown ain't bad), it's a blow to what he's paid to do.
The reason why it's "more expensive" is that Novak was paid to do one thing: score. For his money he's not really known for doing anything else, and there's a reason why D'Antoni benched him until he discovered Lin. If you're paying a scoring specialist $15 million to shoot 3s, that's a pretty expensive 9.4ppg. I mean, I like the dude but he didn't get re-signed for his defense, rebounding or passing. If Dolan cares about money at all, you have to consider the wisdom of re-signing a guy and then destroying the system that he thrived in. It's like a restaurant buying a fryer and then firing the cook. Yeah, it's cheaper, kinda, but you're not really getting good value anymore.


There are 0 Comments. Add Yours.
Shortcuts to mastering the comment thread. Use wisely.
C - Next Comment
X - Mark as Read
R - Reply
Z - Mark Read & Next
Shift + C - Previous
Shift + A - Mark All Read
Comment Settings
Live comment alert: Hide it!
Comments for this post are closed.